Interoperability in Map Generalisation Research

There is a pressing need within the map generalisation research community to initiate processes for supporting cooperation and allowing techniques and results to be shared. On the one hand, increasing complexity of methods and concepts in this domain has made the issue of open access to research evermore necessary to ensure that new investigations can be undertaken at the research frontier with the minimum of ancillary effort. On the other, as the basis for conducting 'good science', researchers must be able to gain access to growing body of prior work, so that comparisons can be made and results evaluated. Realising such desires involves addressing a complex set of interoperability challenges at a number of different levels; technical, syntactic and semantic. The paper describes the experiences of the authors in tackling such issues. It first details the implementation of a web services technology for exposing generalisation research through an open interface. Then it discusses the need for formalized data structures to encode geographic representations and generalization concepts. Finally it considers the issue of semantic interoperability and examines how ontologies might be used to overcome these difficulties.

[1]  Christopher B. Jones,et al.  Automated map generalization with multiple operators: a simulated annealing approach , 2003, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[2]  William Mackaness,et al.  Road Network Simplification in Urban Areas , 2005 .

[3]  R. Thomson,et al.  The ‘ Good Continuation ’ Principle of Perceptual Organization applied to the Generalization of Road Networks , 2002 .

[4]  Stefan Steiniger,et al.  Modelling Cartographic Relations for Categorical Maps , 2005 .

[5]  Monika Sester GENERALIZATION BASED ON LEAST SQUARES ADJUSTMENT , 2000 .

[6]  William A. Mackaness,et al.  Automating the Detection and Simplification of Junctions in Road Networks , 1999, GeoInformatica.

[7]  Ruas AUTOMATIC CHARACTERISATION OF BUILDING ALIGNMENTS BY MEANS OF EXPERT KNOWLEDGE , 2003 .

[8]  Nicola Guarino,et al.  Formal Ontology and Information Systems , 1998 .

[9]  Anura Gurugé,et al.  Universal Description, Discovery, and Integration , 2004 .

[10]  Max J. Egenhofer,et al.  Ontology-driven map generalization , 2005, J. Vis. Lang. Comput..

[11]  Robert Weibel,et al.  Generalization Services on the Web—Classification and an Initial Prototype Implementation , 2005 .

[12]  W. Mackaness,et al.  The application of agents in automated map generalization , 1999 .

[13]  Kevin Lynch,et al.  The Image of the City , 1960 .

[14]  A. Ruas,et al.  Detecting Building Alignments for Generalisation Purposes , 2002 .

[15]  L. Harrie,et al.  Map generalisation technology: addressing the need for a common research platform , 2003 .

[16]  A. Ruas Modèle de généralisation de données géographiques à base de contraintes et d'autonomie , 1999 .

[17]  Monika Sester,et al.  GRAPH BASED APPROACHES FOR RECOGNITION OF PATTERNS AND IMPLICIT INFORMATION IN ROAD NETWORKS , 2005 .

[18]  Jean-Daniel Zucker,et al.  Cartographic generalization as a combination of representing and abstracting knowledge , 1999, GIS '99.

[19]  Nicolas Regnauld SPATIAL STRUCTURES TO SUPPORT AUTOMATIC GENERALISATION , 2005 .

[20]  Paul Hardy,et al.  CLARITY - A NEW ENVIRONMENT FOR GENERALISATION USING AGENTS, JAVA, XML AND TOPOLOGY , 2003 .

[21]  W. Mackaness Analysis of Urban Road Networks to Support Cartographic Generalization , 1995 .

[22]  Andrej Včkovski,et al.  Interoperable and distributed processing in GIS , 1998 .

[23]  Jean Jacques Moreau,et al.  SOAP Version 1. 2 Part 1: Messaging Framework , 2003 .