Internal model and saturating actuation in human operation from view of human-adaptive mechatronics

Human-adaptive mechatronics (HAM) is the area of mechatronics which adapts to the operator skill and assists its improvement. The analysis of human control action is one of the fundamental problems in the study of HAM. A special feature of human control action is the action being saturated with respect to the amplitude and velocity. At the same time, the human does not pay attention continuously to the response but intermittently scans and gets the information. In this paper, the continuous control action based on the scanned information is studied, and the desired trajectory of the human control action is considered to be generated by the closed-loop system including the internal model in the feedback path. Since the visual information is scanned intermittently, the closed-loop reference generator is considered as a sampled-hold system. The feedforward function of the cerebellum can be interpreted as the reference generator with a long scanning interval for the skilled operation. The saturating control action causing the pilot-induced oscillation is studied by taking the swing-up control of a single pendulum from the pendant to the upright position as an example. The two swing-up control laws are studied for reachability of the unstable nonlinear pendulum. One is the linear combination of sine function of the position and angular velocity, and the other is the variable-structure control for the sliding-mode function similar to the linear combination control law. The reachability is analyzed successfully by the color map.

[1]  Katsuhisa Furuta,et al.  Swinging up a pendulum by energy control , 1996, Autom..

[2]  宇野 洋二,et al.  Formation and control of optimal trajectory in human multijoint arm movement : minimum torque-change model , 1988 .

[3]  K. Åström,et al.  Comparison of Riemann and Lebesgue sampling for first order stochastic systems , 2002, Proceedings of the 41st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, 2002..

[4]  M. Pachter,et al.  Manual flight control with saturating actuators , 1998 .

[5]  Richard W. Pew,et al.  Perspectives on human performance modelling , 1983, Autom..

[6]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Is the cerebellum a smith predictor? , 1993, Journal of motor behavior.

[7]  Masao Ito,et al.  Neurobiology: Internal model visualized , 2000, Nature.

[8]  Ronald A. Hess,et al.  Technique for predicting longitudinal pilot-induced oscillations , 1991 .

[9]  Katsuhisa Furuta,et al.  Control of unstable mechanical system Control of pendulum , 1976 .

[10]  K Furuta,et al.  Swing-up Control of Inverted Pendulum Using Pseudo-State Feedback , 1992 .

[11]  M. Kawato,et al.  Formation and control of optimal trajectory in human multijoint arm movement , 1989, Biological Cybernetics.

[12]  W. Brockett,et al.  Minimum attention control , 1997, Proceedings of the 36th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[13]  David L. Kleinman,et al.  An optimal control model of human response part I: Theory and validation , 1970 .

[14]  Sheldon S. L. Chang.  Optimum filtering and control of randomly sampled systems , 1967 .

[15]  Hiroshi Imamizu,et al.  Human cerebellar activity reflecting an acquired internal model of a new tool , 2000, Nature.

[16]  Katsuhisa Furuta,et al.  Design of model-following servo controller , 1982 .

[17]  Koji Ito,et al.  Task skill formation in redundant manipulator systems , 1998, SMC'98 Conference Proceedings. 1998 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (Cat. No.98CH36218).

[18]  M. Kawato.  Adaptation and Learning in Control of Voluntary Movement , 1986 .

[19]  D. Kleinman,et al.  An optimal control model of human response part II: Prediction of human performance in a complex task , 1970 .