Use of artificial neural networks to predict surgical satisfaction in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis: clinical article.

OBJECT The purpose of this study was to develop an artificial neural network (ANN) model for predicting 2-year surgical satisfaction, and to compare the new model with traditional predictive tools in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis. METHODS The 2 prediction models included an ANN and a logistic regression (LR) model. The patient age, sex, duration of symptoms, walking distance, visual analog scale scores of leg pain or numbness, the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score, the Neurogenic Claudication Outcome Score, and the stenosis ratio values were determined as the input variables for the ANN and LR models that were developed. Patient surgical satisfaction was recorded using a standardized measure. The ANNs were fed patient data to predict 2-year surgical satisfaction based on several input variables. Sensitivity analysis was applied to the ANN model to identify the important variables. The receiver operating characteristic-area under curve (ROC-AUC), Hosmer-Lemeshow statistics, and accuracy rate were calculated for evaluating the 2 models. RESULTS A total of 168 patients (59 male, 109 female; mean age 59.8 ± 11.6 years) were divided into training (n = 84), testing (n = 42), and validation (n = 42) data sets. Postsurgical satisfaction was 88.7% at 2-year follow-up. The stenosis ratio was the important variable selected by the ANN. The ANN model displayed a better accuracy rate in 96.9% of patients, a better Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic in 42.4% of patients, and a better ROC-AUC in 80% of patients, compared with the LR model. CONCLUSIONS The findings show that an ANN can predict 2-year surgical satisfaction for use in clinical application and is more accurate compared with an LR model.

[1]  Patrick van der Smagt,et al.  An introduction to neural networks , 2018 .

[2]  Ali Montazeri,et al.  An outcome measure of functionality in patients with lumber spinal stenosis: a validation study of the Iranian version of Neurogenic Claudication Outcome Score (NCOS) , 2012, BMC Neurology.

[3]  Ali Montazeri,et al.  An outcome measure of functionality and pain in patients with lumbar disc herniation: a validation study of the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score , 2012, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

[4]  P. Penar,et al.  Use of an artificial neural network to predict head injury outcome. , 2010, Journal of neurosurgery.

[5]  C. Gevirtz,et al.  CME ARTICLE: Chronic Pain Syndromes After Mastectomy , 2010 .

[6]  C. Gevirtz Update on Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Part 1 Defining the Problem, Diagnosis, and Appropriate Imaging , 2010 .

[7]  J. Markman,et al.  Lumbar spinal stenosis in older adults: current understanding and future directions. , 2008, Clinics in geriatric medicine.

[8]  Jigneshkumar L Patel,et al.  Applications of artificial neural networks in medical science. , 2007, Current clinical pharmacology.

[9]  B. Weiner,et al.  Outcomes of decompression for lumbar spinal canal stenosis based upon preoperative radiographic severity , 2007, Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research.

[10]  Frank Rosenblatt,et al.  Introduction to Neural Networks , 2020, Machine Learning Meets Quantum Physics.

[11]  C. Hamanishi,et al.  Cross-sectional area of the stenotic lumbar dural tube measured from the transverse views of magnetic resonance imaging. , 1994, Journal of spinal disorders.

[12]  D. Price,et al.  The validation of visual analogue scales as ratio scale measures for chronic and experimental pain , 1983, Pain.

[13]  Li Liu,et al.  Neural network modeling for surgical decisions on traumatic brain injury patients , 2000, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[14]  C. Laurencin,et al.  The stenosis ratio: a new tool for the diagnosis of degenerative spinal stenosis. , 1999, International journal of surgical investigation.