Why do patents facilitate trade in technology? Testing the disclosure and appropriation effects

Evidence suggests that patents facilitate technology transactions but the reasons for the effect are unclear. Patents may assist trade in technology by either: (i) protecting buyers against the expropriation of the idea (the ‘appropriation effect’); or (ii) increasing information sharing during the negotiation phase through publication of technical details contained in the patent document (the ‘disclosure effect’). We estimate the strength of both effects using exact matching analysis on a novel dataset of 860 technology transaction negotiations. We find evidence for the appropriation but not the disclosure effect. Technology transaction negotiations involving a granted patent instead of a pending patent (our test for the appropriation effect) are significantly more likely to be successfully completed. The appropriation effect is stronger in technology fields where patent protection is known to be more effective such as biotech, chemicals, drugs and medical.

[1]  James E. Bessen,et al.  Patent Failure: How Judges, Bureaucrats, and Lawyers Put Innovators at Risk , 2008 .

[2]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  Proofs and Prototypes for Sale: The Licensing of University Inventions , 2001 .

[3]  W. G. Cochran The effectiveness of adjustment by subclassification in removing bias in observational studies. , 1968, Biometrics.

[4]  K. Arrow Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention , 1962 .

[5]  D. Rubin,et al.  Assessing Sensitivity to an Unobserved Binary Covariate in an Observational Study with Binary Outcome , 1983 .

[6]  A. Arundel,et al.  What percentage of innovations are patented? empirical estimates for European firms , 1998 .

[7]  Janusz A. Ordover,et al.  A Patent System for Both Diffusion and Exclusion , 1991 .

[8]  Scott Stern,et al.  Is There a Market for Ideas? , 2009 .

[9]  Ashish Arora,et al.  Patent Protection, Complementary Assets, and Firms' Incentives for Technology Licensing , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[10]  James J. Heckman,et al.  Using matching, instrumental variables and control functions to estimate economic choice models , 2004 .

[11]  W. Haenszel,et al.  Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. , 1959, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[12]  A. Agrawal,et al.  Deals Not Done: Sources of Failure in the Market for Ideas , 2013 .

[13]  James J. Anton,et al.  Expropriation and Inventions: Appropriable Rents in the Absence of Property Rights , 1994 .

[14]  D. Rubin Matched Sampling for Causal Effects: Matching to Remove Bias in Observational Studies , 1973 .

[15]  Sascha O. Becker,et al.  Mhbounds - Sensitivity Analysis for Average Treatment Effects , 2007 .

[16]  E. Mansfield Patents and Innovation: An Empirical Study , 1986 .

[17]  J. Marshall Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2004 .

[18]  J. Gans,et al.  The Product Market and the Market for 'Ideas': Commercialization Strategies for Technology Entrepreneurs , 2002 .

[19]  A. Arora,et al.  Markets for Technology: The Economics of Innovation and Corporate Strategy , 2002 .

[20]  S. Winter,et al.  Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development , 1987 .

[21]  Gaétan de Rassenfosse How SMEs exploit their intellectual property assets: evidence from survey data , 2011, Small Business Economics.

[22]  N Lubello,et al.  Open innovation in global networks , 2017 .

[23]  G. King,et al.  Cem: Coarsened Exact Matching in Stata , 2009 .

[24]  Amy M. Hightower,et al.  Science and Engineering Indicators , 1993 .

[25]  Carsten Burhop,et al.  The Transfer of Patents in Imperial Germany , 2009, The Journal of Economic History.

[26]  Kazuyuki Motohashi,et al.  Understanding the technology market for patents: New insights from a licensing survey of Japanese firms , 2012 .

[27]  A. Aakvik,et al.  Bounding a Matching Estimator: The Case of a Norwegian Training Program , 2001 .

[28]  R. Caves,et al.  THE IMPERFECT MARKET FOR TECHNOLOGY LICENSES , 2009 .

[29]  Daniel F. Spulber Innovation and international trade in technology , 2008, J. Econ. Theory.

[30]  Richard R. Nelson,et al.  Appropriating the Returns from Industrial R&D , 1988 .

[31]  A. Arora Licensing Tacit Knowledge: Intellectual Property Rights And The Market For Know-How , 1995 .

[32]  K. Blind,et al.  Motives to patent: Empirical evidence from Germany , 2006 .

[33]  Mark A. Lemley,et al.  Journal of Economic Perspectives—Volume 19, Number 2—Spring 2005—Pages 75–98 Probabilistic Patents , 2022 .

[34]  D. Teece Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[35]  Kenneth L. Sokoloff,et al.  Market Trade in Patents and the Rise of a Class of Specialized Inventors in the 19th-Century United States , 2001 .

[36]  G. King,et al.  Causal Inference without Balance Checking: Coarsened Exact Matching , 2012, Political Analysis.

[37]  S. Shane Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Selling University Technology: Patterns from MIT , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[38]  D. Teece Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[39]  Andrzej Skrzypacz Bargaining under Asymmetric Information and the Hold-up Problem , 2004 .

[40]  D. Rubin,et al.  Assessing Sensitivity to an Unobserved Binary Covariate in a Nonrandomized Experiment with Binary Outcome. , 1982 .

[41]  Lee G. Branstetter,et al.  Do Stronger Intellectual Property Rights Increase International Technology Transfer? Empirical Evidence from U.S. Firm-Level Panel Data , 2004 .

[42]  Daniel W. Elfenbein,et al.  Publications, Patents, and the Market for University Inventions , 2006 .

[43]  Working Party on Globalisation of Industry , 2011 .

[44]  Scott Shane,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Selling University Technology: Patterns from MIT , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[45]  Sascha O. Becker,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis for Average Treatment Effects , 2007 .

[46]  C. Shapiro,et al.  How to License Intangible Property , 1986 .

[47]  C. Longt Patent Signals , 2017 .

[48]  P. Jensen,et al.  Trust and the market for technology , 2015, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[49]  R. Zeckhauser The challenge of contracting for technological information. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[50]  James J. Anton,et al.  Patents, Invalidity, and the Strategic Transmission of Enabling Information , 2003 .

[51]  G. King,et al.  Multivariate Matching Methods That Are Monotonic Imbalance Bounding , 2011 .