Phonology and perception : A cognitive scientist ’ s perspective

As a researcher who has long been interested in the perception, use, and acquisition of language, the title of this volume, Phonology in Perception, already piques my interest. Closer examination reveals an exciting development: A diverse group of researchers grounded deeply in the discipline of linguistics are grappling with details of the actual human processing of language, something that would have been almost unthinkable just a few years ago. Every chapter speaks to issues of processing and learning about spoken language and refers to data from experimental psycholinguistics. These developments lend hope to the idea that the distinction between linguistic and psychological approaches to language will gradually fade away, replaced by an interdisciplinary investigation of language, encompassing the structure, use and acquisition of language and even language change. The remarks I make below are offered in the spirit of hastening this integration. The authors of the various chapters raise a number of issues and questions, either explicitly or implicitly, that lie at the heart of debates within psychological as well as linguistic circles.

[1]  P. Smolensky,et al.  Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar , 2004 .

[2]  R. H. Baayen,et al.  The CELEX Lexical Database (CD-ROM) , 1996 .

[3]  James L. McClelland,et al.  The TRACE model of speech perception , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[4]  J E Cutting,et al.  Perceptual Categories for Musiclike Sounds: Implications for Theories of Speech Perception , 1976, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[5]  L. Holt,et al.  Effects of later-occurring nonlinguistic sounds on speech categorization. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  Paul Boersma,et al.  The evolution of auditory dispersion in bidirectional constraint grammars* , 2008, Phonology.

[7]  Bruce Hayes,et al.  A Maximum Entropy Model of Phonotactics and Phonotactic Learning , 2008, Linguistic Inquiry.

[8]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  A theory of lexical access in speech production , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[9]  James L. McClelland,et al.  A single-system account of semantic and lexical deficits in five semantic dementia patients , 2008, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[10]  J. Fodor.  The Modularity of mind. An essay on faculty psychology , 1986 .

[11]  D. Poeppel,et al.  Dorsal and ventral streams: a framework for understanding aspects of the functional anatomy of language , 2004, Cognition.

[12]  Janet B. Pierrehumbert,et al.  Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition and contrast , 2000 .

[13]  J. D. Miller,et al.  Speech perception by the chinchilla: voiced-voiceless distinction in alveolar plosive consonants , 1975, Science.

[14]  J. Hay.  Lexical frequency in morphology: Is everything relative? , 2001 .

[15]  A. Lotto,et al.  General contrast effects in speech perception: Effect of preceding liquid on stop consonant identification , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  Edward Flemming,et al.  Auditory Representations in Phonology , 2002 .

[17]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Categorization and discrimination of nonspeech sounds: differences between steady-state and rapidly-changing acoustic cues. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Graded Constraints on English Word Forms , 2006 .

[19]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Structure and deterioration of semantic memory: a neuropsychological and computational investigation. , 2004, Psychological review.

[20]  Alvin M. Liberman,et al.  Speech: A Special Code , 1996 .

[21]  Joan Bybee.  Joan Bybee: Phonology and Language Use , 2004, Phonetica.

[22]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dissociating Reading Processes on the Basis of Neuronal Interactions , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[23]  P. Kuhl.  Human adults and human infants show a “perceptual magnet effect” for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[24]  M. Studdert-Kennedy,et al.  Self-organizing processes and the explanation of phonological universals , 1983 .