Understanding Human Reading Comprehension with Brain Signals

Reading comprehension is a complex cognitive process involving many human brain activities. Plenty of works have studied the reading patterns and attention allocation mechanisms in the reading process. However, little is known about what happens in human brain during reading comprehension and how we can utilize this information as implicit feedback to facilitate information acquisition performance. With the advances in brain imaging techniques such as electroencephalogram (EEG), it is possible to collect highprecision brain signals in almost real time. With neuroimaging techniques, we carefully design a lab-based user study to investigate brain activities during reading comprehension. Our findings show that neural responses vary with different types of contents, i.e., contents that can satisfy users’ information needs and contents that cannot. We suggest that various cognitive activities, e.g., cognitive loading, semantic-thematic understanding, and inferential processing, at the micro-time scale during reading comprehension underpin these neural responses. Inspired by these detectable differences in cognitive activities, we construct supervised learning models based on EEG features for two reading comprehension tasks: answer sentence classification and answer extraction. Results show that it is feasible to improve their performance with brain signals. These findings imply that brain signals are valuable feedback for enhancing human-computer interactions during reading comprehension.

[1]  T. Fernández,et al.  EEG delta activity: an indicator of attention to internal processing during performance of mental tasks. , 1996, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[2]  W. Bruce Croft,et al.  Answer Interaction in Non-factoid Question Answering Systems , 2019, CHIIR.

[3]  D. Blackwood,et al.  Cognitive Brain Potentials and their Application , 1990, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[4]  J. Hsiao Visual field differences in visual word recognition can emerge purely from perceptual learning: Evidence from modeling Chinese character pronunciation , 2011, Brain and Language.

[5]  M. Kutas,et al.  Reading between the lines: Event-related brain potentials during natural sentence processing , 1980, Brain and Language.

[6]  Frank E. Pollick,et al.  Towards Predicting a Realisation of an Information Need based on Brain Signals , 2019, WWW.

[7]  Marina Schmid,et al.  An Introduction To The Event Related Potential Technique , 2016 .

[8]  Benjamin Blankertz,et al.  Towards a Cure for BCI Illiteracy , 2009, Brain Topography.

[9]  Manuel J. A. Eugster,et al.  Natural brain-information interfaces: Recommending information by relevance inferred from human brain signals , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[10]  Randi C. Martin,et al.  Neural basis of semantic and syntactic interference in sentence comprehension , 2013, Brain and Language.

[11]  Bao-Liang Lu,et al.  Multimodal emotion recognition using EEG and eye tracking data , 2014, 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[12]  Samuel Kaski,et al.  Towards brain-activity-controlled information retrieval: Decoding image relevance from MEG signals , 2015, NeuroImage.

[13]  Robert G. Crowder,et al.  The psychology of reading: An introduction , 1982 .

[14]  G E Raney,et al.  Monitoring changes in cognitive load during reading: an event-related brain potential and reaction time analysis. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[15]  Sandra K Loo,et al.  Clinical Utility of EEG in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Research Update , 2005, Neurotherapeutics.

[16]  A. Cichocki,et al.  A novel BCI based on ERP components sensitive to configural processing of human faces , 2012, Journal of neural engineering.

[17]  E. Vogel,et al.  The visual N1 component as an index of a discrimination process. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[18]  Jacek Gwizdka,et al.  Temporal dynamics of eye‐tracking and EEG during reading and relevance decisions , 2017, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[19]  H. Kolk,et al.  An ERP study of P600 effects elicited by semantic anomalies. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[20]  Shangkai Gao,et al.  An online brain–computer interface using non-flashing visual evoked potentials , 2010, Journal of neural engineering.

[21]  Mohammad Soleymani,et al.  Short-term emotion assessment in a recall paradigm , 2009, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[22]  Yiqun Liu,et al.  Different Users, Different Opinions: Predicting Search Satisfaction with Mouse Movement Information , 2015, SIGIR.

[23]  Yiqun Liu,et al.  Human Behavior Inspired Machine Reading Comprehension , 2019, SIGIR.

[24]  Bhaskar Mitra,et al.  Overview of the TREC 2019 deep learning track , 2020, ArXiv.

[25]  Petra Burkhardt,et al.  Inferential bridging relations reveal distinct neural mechanisms: Evidence from event-related brain potentials , 2006, Brain and Language.

[26]  Yiqun Liu,et al.  Understanding Reading Attention Distribution during Relevance Judgement , 2018, CIKM.

[27]  Tuukka Ruotsalo,et al.  Why do Users Issue Good Queries?: Neural Correlates of Term Specificity , 2019, SIGIR.

[28]  Frank E. Pollick,et al.  Search Process as Transitions Between Neural States , 2018, WWW.

[29]  Peng Li,et al.  Dataset and Neural Recurrent Sequence Labeling Model for Open-Domain Factoid Question Answering , 2016, ArXiv.

[30]  T. Nazir,et al.  Reading habits, perceptual learning, and recognition of printed words , 2004, Brain and Language.

[31]  Frank E. Pollick,et al.  Understanding Relevance: An fMRI Study , 2013, ECIR.

[32]  Samuel Kaski,et al.  Integrating neurophysiologic relevance feedback in intent modeling for information retrieval , 2019, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[33]  A. Jacobs,et al.  Coregistration of eye movements and EEG in natural reading: analyses and review. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[34]  Sharlene D. Newman,et al.  The effect of semantic relatedness on syntactic analysis: An fMRI study , 2010, Brain and Language.

[35]  Thierry Baccino,et al.  Decision-making in information seeking on texts: an eye-fixation-related potentials investigation , 2013, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[36]  Jacek Gwizdka,et al.  Inferring user knowledge level from eye movement patterns , 2013, Inf. Process. Manag..

[37]  Yashar Moshfeghi,et al.  The Cortical Activity of Graded Relevance , 2020, SIGIR.

[38]  Alessandro Moschitti,et al.  Automatic Feature Engineering for Answer Selection and Extraction , 2013, EMNLP.

[39]  Chris Callison-Burch,et al.  Answer Extraction as Sequence Tagging with Tree Edit Distance , 2013, NAACL.

[40]  Valer Jurcak,et al.  10/20, 10/10, and 10/5 systems revisited: Their validity as relative head-surface-based positioning systems , 2007, NeuroImage.

[41]  Jacek Gwizdka,et al.  Characterizing relevance with eye-tracking measures , 2014, IIiX.

[42]  Lourens J. Waldorp,et al.  Spatiotemporal EEG/MEG source analysis based on a parametric noise covariance model , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[43]  Frank E. Pollick,et al.  When Relevance Judgement is Happening?: An EEG-based Study , 2015, SIGIR.

[44]  Jacek Gwizdka Inferring Web Page Relevance Using Pupillometry and Single Channel EEG , 2018 .

[45]  D. Lehmann,et al.  Reference-free identification of components of checkerboard-evoked multichannel potential fields. , 1980, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[46]  John C J Hoeks,et al.  Seeing words in context: the interaction of lexical and sentence level information during reading. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[47]  Roberto I. González-Ibáñez,et al.  Using low‐cost electroencephalography (EEG) sensor to identify perceived relevance on web search , 2016, ASIST.

[48]  Frank E. Pollick,et al.  Understanding Information Need: An fMRI Study , 2016, SIGIR.

[49]  W. A. Sarnacki,et al.  Electroencephalographic (EEG) control of three-dimensional movement , 2010, Journal of neural engineering.

[50]  Alessandro Angrilli,et al.  Gamma EEG activity induced by semantic violation during sentence reading , 2009, Neuroscience Letters.

[51]  M. Kutas,et al.  Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association , 1984, Nature.

[52]  Christian Mühl,et al.  EEG analysis for implicit tagging of video data , 2009, 2009 3rd International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction and Workshops.

[53]  G. Woodman,et al.  Event-related potential studies of attention , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[54]  Anselmo Peñas,et al.  On Evaluating the Contribution of Validation for Question Answering , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[55]  Yiqun Liu,et al.  Teach Machine How to Read: Reading Behavior Inspired Relevance Estimation , 2019, SIGIR.

[56]  W. Bruce Croft,et al.  Do People and Neural Nets Pay Attention to the Same Words: Studying Eye-tracking Data for Non-factoid QA Evaluation , 2020, CIKM.

[57]  W. Klimesch EEG alpha and theta oscillations reflect cognitive and memory performance: a review and analysis , 1999, Brain Research Reviews.