Bohr against Bell: complementarity versus nonlocality

Abstract In this note we compare the views of Bohr (known as the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics) with the views of Bell: complementarity versus nonlocality.

[1]  Niels Bohr,et al.  Discussion with Einstein on Epistemological Problems in Atomic Physics , 1996 .

[2]  R. N. Schouten,et al.  Experimental loophole-free violation of a Bell inequality using entangled electron spins separated by 1.3 km , 2015, 1508.05949.

[3]  N. N. Vorob’ev.  Consistent Families of Measures and Their Extensions , 1962 .

[4]  Luigi Accardi,et al.  The Probabilistic Roots of the Quantum Mechanical Paradoxes , 1984 .

[5]  A. Zeilinger,et al.  Significant-Loophole-Free Test of Bell's Theorem with Entangled Photons. , 2015, Physical review letters.

[6]  Marian Kupczynski,et al.  Can Einstein with Bohr Debate on Quantum Mechanics Be Closed , 2016 .

[7]  Arkady Plotnitsky,et al.  Reading Bohr: Physics and Philosophy , 2006 .

[8]  A. E. Allahverdyan,et al.  Brownian Entanglement , 2004 .

[9]  Andrei Khrennikov,et al.  Contextual Approach to Quantum Formalism , 2009 .

[10]  D. A. Edwards.  The mathematical foundations of quantum mechanics , 1979, Synthese.

[11]  William Carbonaro,et al.  After the Bell , 2010 .

[12]  N. David Mermin,et al.  Boojums All The Way Through , 1990 .

[13]  Andrei Khrennikov.  EPR-Bohm Experiment and Interference of Probabilities , 2004 .

[14]  Arkady Plotnitsky,et al.  Epistemology and Probability: Bohr, Heisenberg, Schrödinger, and the Nature of Quantum-Theoretical Thinking , 2009 .

[15]  A. Zeilinger,et al.  Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics , 1989 .

[16]  Helly.  Grundbegriffe der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung , 1936 .

[17]  A E Bostwick,et al.  THE THEORY OF PROBABILITIES. , 1896, Science.

[18]  Andrei Khrennikov,et al.  Quantum-like modeling of cognition , 2015, Front. Phys..

[19]  E. Knill,et al.  A strong loophole-free test of local realism , 2015, 2016 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (CLEO).

[20]  Jörn Beyer,et al.  A significant-loophole-free test of Bell's theorem with entangled photons , 2017, Security + Defence.

[21]  H. Weinfurter,et al.  Entanglement-based quantum communication over 144km , 2007 .

[22]  George Boole,et al.  An Investigation of the Laws of Thought: Frontmatter , 2009 .

[23]  Marian Kupczynski,et al.  Is Einsteinian no-signalling violated in Bell tests? , 2017, 1709.00708.

[24]  Guillaume Adenier,et al.  Test of the no‐signaling principle in the Hensen loophole‐free CHSH experiment , 2016, 1606.00784.

[25]  N. Bohr.  II - Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality be Considered Complete? , 1935 .

[26]  Karl Hess,et al.  Bell’s theorem: Critique of proofs with and without inequalities , 2005 .

[27]  Albert Einstein,et al.  Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete? , 1935 .

[28]  Howard Wiseman,et al.  Quantum physics: Death by experiment for local realism , 2015, Nature.

[29]  S. Wehner,et al.  Loophole-free Bell inequality violation using electron spins separated by 1.3 kilometres , 2015, Nature.

[30]  K. Michielsen,et al.  The photon identification loophole in EPRB experiments: computer models with single-wing selection , 2017, 1707.08307.

[31]  Karl Hess.  Einstein Was Right , 2014 .

[32]  Alain Aspect,et al.  Viewpoint: Closing the Door on Einstein and Bohr’s Quantum Debate , 2015 .

[33]  H. Weinfurter,et al.  Free-Space distribution of entanglement and single photons over 144 km , 2006, quant-ph/0607182.

[34]  Armin W. Schulz,et al.  Interpretations of probability , 2003 .

[35]  Shellee D. Dyer,et al.  A strong loophole-free test of local realism , 2015 .

[36]  A. Kolmogoroff.  Grundbegriffe der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung , 1933 .