Simulation of wear on a rough rail using a time-domain wheel–track interaction model

This paper presents results from simulations of railhead wear due to initial sinusoidal and broad-band roughness using a time-domain wheel–track vertical interaction model integrated with a three-dimensional wheel–rail contact model. As typical roughness wavelengths are short and frequencies are high compared with vehicle body motions, the vehicle is simplified to an unsprung wheel mass. The rail is modelled as a Timoshenko beam discretely supported by pads, sleepers and ballast. The wheel–rail contact in the interaction model is modelled with a non-linear Hertzian contact spring. The obtained wheel–rail forces are then incorporated into the three-dimensional contact model to calculate wear over the railhead. The wheel–rail contact is modelled as non-Hertzian and non-steady based on the Variational Method [G. Xie, S.D. Iwnicki, Calculation of wear on a corrugated rail using a three-dimensional contact model, in: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Contact Mechanics and Wear of Rail/Wheel Systems, Brisbane, Australia, Materials Australia, 2006] and the wear is assumed to be proportional to the friction work. Cases of both a free and a driven wheel with a constant torque are considered. The phase angles between dynamic wheel–rail force and roughness are examined and wear is found to be almost in-phase with roughness and therefore, no roughness growth is predicted by the model as presented in its current form. Although clearly in contradiction to reality where roughness grows under certain conditions this work leads to interesting question about why roughness growth is predicted by a simple contact model but not when complexity is increased to include non-Hertzian and non-steady contact conditions.

[1]  H. Benaroya,et al.  DYNAMICS OF TRANSVERSELY VIBRATING BEAMS USING FOUR ENGINEERING THEORIES , 1999 .

[2]  Jens C. O. Nielsen,et al.  VERTICAL DYNAMIC INTERACTION BETWEEN TRAIN AND TRACK INFLUENCE OF WHEEL AND TRACK IMPERFECTIONS , 1995 .

[3]  K. L. Johnson,et al.  The Dynamic Response of Railway Track to High Frequency Vertical Excitation , 1982 .

[4]  J. K. Hedrick,et al.  A Comparison of Alternative Creep Force Models for Rail Vehicle Dynamic Analysis , 1983 .

[5]  S. Muller.  A LINEAR WHEEL–TRACK MODEL TO PREDICT INSTABILITY AND SHORT PITCH CORRUGATION , 1999 .

[6]  K. Johnson,et al.  Three-Dimensional Elastic Bodies in Rolling Contact , 1990 .

[7]  Zefeng Wen,et al.  Numerical simulation of rail corrugation on a curved track , 2005 .

[8]  Thomas Abrahamsson,et al.  Simulation of Interaction Between a Train in General Motion and a Track , 2002 .

[9]  David Thompson,et al.  Interactions between multiple moving wheels and a railway track , 2004 .

[10]  Gang Xie,et al.  Calculation of wear on a corrugated rail using a three-dimensional contact model , 2008 .

[11]  Ross A. Clark,et al.  An Investigation into the Dynamic Effects of Railway Vehicles Running on Corrugated Rails , 1982 .

[12]  Heike Ilias,et al.  Rail head corrugation growth predictions based on non-linear high frequency vehicle/track interaction , 1997 .

[13]  David Thompson,et al.  Responses of infinite periodic structures to moving or stationary harmonic loads , 2005 .

[14]  J. Kalousek,et al.  A dynamic model for an asymmetrical vehicle/track system , 2003 .

[15]  Jens C. O. Nielsen,et al.  Train-Track Interaction and Mechanisms of Irregular Wear on Wheel and Rail Surfaces , 2003 .

[16]  K. Knothe,et al.  An extended linear model for the prediction of short pitch corrugation , 1996 .

[17]  T. X. Wu,et al.  Behaviour of the Normal Contact Force Under Multiple Wheel/Rail Interaction , 2002 .