Correlation between EMG and COP onset latency in response to a horizontal platform translation.

This study examined the relationship between onset latencies estimates from EMG and center of pressure (COP) in young (five female, five male; mean=24.2+/-2.3 years) and older (six female, four male; 78.4+/-2.3 years) subjects during anterior or posterior platform translations. The latencies to onset of activity were estimated for the tibialis anterior (TA; mean=119.8 ms across both age groups) and COP (mean=139.7 ms across both groups) for anterior translations, and the soleus (SOL; mean=122.4 ms across both groups), gastrocnemius (GAS; mean=126.0 ms for young, and 115.9 ms for old subjects) and COP (mean=160.0 ms across both groups) for posterior translations. Average within-subject correlations (r') among these measures showed a high correlation between TA and COP onset latency (r'=0.667, young; r'=0.482, old), and relatively low correlations between the plantar flexors (SOL and GAS) and COP onset latencies (SOL: r'=0.292 for young, r'=0.249 for old; GAS: r'=0.126 for young, r'=0.143 for old). The SOL and GAS onset latencies correlated well with each other, especially in the older subjects (r'=0.762), suggesting that the contribution of two muscles creates some variability in the relationship with COP onset latency. The strong correlation between TA and COP for anterior perturbations, coupled with the weaker correlations for the plantar flexors suggest that the COP method may be preferable for studies interested in determining timing of postural responses to multidirectional perturbations.

[1]  F. Horak,et al.  The importance of somatosensory information in triggering and scaling automatic postural responses in humans , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[2]  F O Black,et al.  Age-related changes in human posture control: motor coordination tests. , 1990, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[3]  M. Hulliger,et al.  Proprioceptive control of posture: a review of new concepts. , 1998, Gait & posture.

[4]  Neil B. Alexander,et al.  Postural Control in Young and Elderly Adults When Stance is Challenged: Clinical versus Laboratory Measurements , 1993, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[5]  Brian E. Maki,et al.  The time course of attention shifts following perturbation of upright stance , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[6]  F. Horak,et al.  Postural perturbations: new insights for treatment of balance disorders. , 1997, Physical therapy.

[7]  N T Shepard,et al.  An overview of the clinical use of dynamic posturography in the differential diagnosis of balance disorders. , 1999, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[8]  M. Schieppati,et al.  Free and supported stance in Parkinson's disease. The effect of posture and 'postural set' on leg muscle responses to perturbation, and its relation to the severity of the disease. , 1991, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[9]  L. Nashner Adapting reflexes controlling the human posture , 1976, Experimental Brain Research.

[10]  Mark S Redfern,et al.  Attentional dynamics in postural control during perturbations in young and older adults. , 2002, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[11]  F. Horak,et al.  Vestibular stimulation affects medium latency postural muscle responses , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[12]  M. Redfern,et al.  Effect of Preparation on Dual-Task Performance in Postural Control , 2004, Journal of motor behavior.

[13]  R. P. Fabio Reliability of computerized surface electromyography for determining the onset of muscle activity. , 1987 .

[14]  W. Bruzek,et al.  Variability of postural “reflexes” in humans , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.