When workers disunite: intraspecific parasitism by eusocial bees.

One of the most obvious characteristics of an insect society is reproductive cooperation. Yet insect colonies are vulnerable to reproductive parasitism, both by workers from their own colony and by workers from others. Little is known about the mechanisms insect societies have evolved to protect themselves from being exploited from within and outside the colony and the mechanisms that social parasites have evolved to circumvent these mechanisms. Here we showcase recently discovered cases of intraspecific parasitism by workers in eusocial bees. These discoveries overturn the widespread view that insect colonies are like fortresses populated by female eunuchs, and yield important insights into the mechanisms that normally enforce functional worker sterility.

[1]  J. Free,et al.  The drifting of honey-bees , 1958, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[2]  A. Bourke Sex ratios in bumble bees , 1997 .

[3]  Y. Le Conte,et al.  Effect of Aliphatic Esters on Ovary Development of Queenless Bees (Apis mellifera L.) , 1998, Naturwissenschaften.

[4]  A. Bourke Worker matricide in social bees and wasps , 1994 .

[5]  B. Oldroyd,et al.  Towards a molecular definition of worker sterility: differential gene expression and reproductive plasticity in honey bees , 2006, Insect molecular biology.

[6]  F. Ratnieks,et al.  Regulation of ovary activation in worker honey-bees (Apis mellifera): larval signal production and adult response thresholds differ between anarchistic and wild-type bees , 2001, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[7]  T. Wossler Pheromone mimicry by Apis mellifera capensis social parasites leads to reproductive anarchy in host Apis mellifera scutellata colonies , 2002 .

[8]  F. Ratnieks,et al.  A non-policing honey bee colony (Apis mellifera capensis) , 2002, Naturwissenschaften.

[9]  Ben Hui Liu,et al.  Statistical Genomics: Linkage, Mapping, and QTL Analysis , 1997 .

[10]  F. Ratnieks,et al.  Power over reproduction in social hymenoptera. , 2003, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[11]  B. Oldroyd,et al.  Social parasitism by workers in queenless and queenright Apis cerana colonies , 2007, Molecular ecology.

[12]  S. Jay The effect of various combinations of immature queen and worker bees on the ovary development of worker honeybees in colonies with and without queens , 1970 .

[13]  F. Ratnieks,et al.  Adaptive shifts in honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) guarding behavior support predictions of the acceptance threshold model , 2000 .

[14]  G. Robinson,et al.  Intracolonial behavioral variation in worker oviposition, oophagy, and larval care in queenless honey bee colonies , 1990, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[15]  P. Kryger,et al.  Competition for royalty in bees , 1996, Nature.

[16]  B. Oldroyd,et al.  THE EVOLUTION OF WORKER STERILITY IN HONEY BEES: AN INVESTIGATION INTO A BEHAVIORAL MUTANT CAUSING FAILURE OF WORKER POLICING , 1998, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[17]  Andrew B. Barron,et al.  Worker policing in the bee Apis florea , 2001, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[18]  W. Jordan,et al.  Social parasitism by male-producing reproductive workers in a eusocial insect , 2004, Nature.

[19]  J. Strassmann,et al.  Conflict over male parentage in stingless bees , 2004, Insectes Sociaux.

[20]  M. Winston,et al.  Worker honey bee ovary development: seasonal variation and the influence of larval and adult nutrition , 2005, Journal of Comparative Physiology B.

[21]  M. Winston,et al.  Orientation and drifting behaviour of bumblebees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in commercial tomato greenhouses , 2004 .

[22]  S. Jay Ovary development of worker honeybees when separated from worker brood by various methods , 1972 .

[23]  W. Hamilton The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. , 1964, Journal of theoretical biology.

[24]  N. Isaac,et al.  Radio-Tagging Technology Reveals Extreme Nest-Drifting Behavior in a Eusocial Insect , 2007, Current Biology.

[25]  Prof. Dr. H. R. Hepburn,et al.  Honeybees of Africa , 1998, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[26]  M. Winston,et al.  Anarchistic queen honey bees have normal queen mandibular pheromones , 2005, Insectes Sociaux.

[27]  B. Oldroyd,et al.  Preservation and loss of the honey bee (Apis) egg-marking signal across evolutionary time , 2007, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[28]  Thomas Schmitt,et al.  Surface hydrocarbons of queen eggs regulate worker reproduction in a social insect. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  K. Hartfelder,et al.  Not Only Single Mating in Stingless Bees , 1999, Naturwissenschaften.

[30]  B. Oldroyd,et al.  Entomology: Asian honeybees parasitize the future dead , 2005, Nature.

[31]  M. Beekman,et al.  Higher removal rate of eggs laid by anarchistic queens—a cost of anarchy? , 2007, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[32]  F. Ratnieks,et al.  Egg marking pheromones of anarchistic worker honeybees (Apis mellifera) , 2004 .

[33]  Steven A. Frank,et al.  Mutual policing and repression of competition in the evolution of cooperative groups , 1995, Nature.

[34]  H. Velthuis,et al.  Development and reproductive strategies in Bombus terrestris colonies , 1988 .

[35]  J. Free,et al.  Pheromones of social bees , 1987 .

[36]  H. Hepburn,et al.  Social parasitism by Cape honeybee workers in colonies of their own subspecies (Apis mellifera capensis Esch.) , 2006, Insectes Sociaux.

[37]  R. Crozier,et al.  Genetic Intrigues. (Book Reviews: Evolution of Social Insect Colonies. Sex Allocation and Kin Selection.) , 1997 .

[38]  A. Bourke,et al.  Kin-selected conflict in the bumble-bee Bombus terrestris (Hymenoptera: Apidae) , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[39]  M. Beekman,et al.  Honeybee workers use cues other than egg viability for policing , 2005, Biology Letters.

[40]  N. Koeniger,et al.  Colony performance in honeybees (Apis mellifera capensis Esch.) depends on the proportion of subordinate and dominant workers , 1989, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[41]  N. Koeniger,et al.  Body size and reproductive success of drones (Apis mellifera L) , 1997 .

[42]  S. Turillazzi,et al.  Variation in cuticular hydrocarbon signatures, hormonal correlates and establishment of reproductive dominance in a polistine wasp. , 2004, Journal of insect physiology.

[43]  C. Pirk,et al.  The behaviour of drifted Cape honeybee workers (Apis mellifera capensis): predisposition for social parasitism? , 2003 .

[44]  K. Crailsheim,et al.  The behaviour of drifted nurse honey bees , 1999, Insectes Sociaux.

[45]  A. Estoup,et al.  Queen-worker conflict over male production and the sex ratio in a facultatively polyandrous bumblebee, Bombus hypnorum: the consequences of nest usurpation. , 2001, Molecular ecology.

[46]  L. Keller,et al.  The role of queen pheromones in social insects: queen control or queen signal? , 1993, Animal Behaviour.

[47]  A. Barron,et al.  Worker reproduction in honey-bees (Apis) and the anarchic syndrome: a review , 2001, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[48]  G. Robinson,et al.  Reproductive competition in queenless honey bee colonies (Apis mellifera L.) , 1994, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[49]  F. Ratnieks,et al.  Anarchy in the UK: Detailed genetic analysis of worker reproduction in a naturally occurring British anarchistic honeybee, Apis mellifera, colony using DNA microsatellites , 2002, Molecular ecology.

[50]  M. Beekman Is Her Majesty at home? , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[51]  P. A. Moritz,et al.  Bees as Superorganisms , 1992, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[52]  M. Lachance,et al.  The frequency of multiple paternity in bumble bee (Bombus) colonies based on microsatellite DNA at the B10 locus , 2003, Insectes Sociaux.

[53]  F. Ruttner,et al.  CYTOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF THE THELYTOKOUS PARTHENOGENESIS IN THE CAPE HONEYBEE (APIS MELLIFERA CAPENSIS ESCHOLTZ) , 1983 .

[54]  J. Greeff,et al.  Effects of Thelytokous Worker Reproduction on Kin-Selection and Conflict in the Cape Honeybee, Apis mellifera capensis , 1996 .

[55]  M. Beekman,et al.  Bumblebee sex ratios: why do bumblebees produce so many males? , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[56]  Andrew B. Barron,et al.  Measuring the cost of worker reproduction in honeybees: work tempo in an "anarchic" line , 2004 .

[57]  M. Solignac,et al.  Monoandry and polyandry in bumble bees (Hymenoptera; Bombinae) as evidenced by highly variable microsatellites , 1995, Molecular ecology.

[58]  B. Oldroyd,et al.  The evolution of worker sterility in honeybees: the genetic basis of failure of worker policing , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[59]  M. Winston,et al.  Retinue attraction and ovary activation: responses of wild type and anarchistic honey bees (Apis mellifera) to queen and brood pheromones , 2005, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[60]  F. Ratnieks,et al.  Searching for the egg-marking signal in honeybees , 2005 .

[61]  P. Visscher,et al.  Reproductive conflict in honey bees: a stalemate of worker egg-laying and policing , 1996, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[62]  J. Cornuet,et al.  Whole-Genome Scan in Thelytokous-Laying Workers of the Cape Honeybee (Apis mellifera capensis): Central Fusion, Reduced Recombination Rates and Centromere Mapping Using Half-Tetrad Analysis , 2004, Genetics.

[63]  S. Martin,et al.  Usurpation of African Apis mellifera scutellata colonies by parasitic Apis mellifera capensis workers , 2002 .

[64]  J. Strassmann,et al.  Microsatellites and kinship. , 1993, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[65]  J. Free The behaviour of egg-laying workers of bumblebee colonies , 1955 .

[66]  F. Ratnieks,et al.  Evolution of worker sterility in honey-bees (Apis mellifera): how anarchistic workers evade policing by laying eggs that have low removal rates , 2000, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[67]  D. Goulson Bumblebees: their behaviour and ecology. , 2003 .

[68]  B. Oldroyd,et al.  Paternity frequency and maternity of males in some stingless bee species , 2002, Molecular ecology.

[69]  R. Paxton Genetic structure of colonies and a male aggregation in the stingless bee Scaptotrigona postica, as revealed by microsatellite analysis , 2000, Insectes Sociaux.

[70]  J. Beetsma The process of queen-worker differentiation in the honey-bee , 1979 .

[71]  A. Barron,et al.  Social regulation of ovary activation in ’anarchistic’ honey-bees (Apis mellifera) , 2001, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[72]  M. Winston,et al.  Drifting bumble bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae) workers in commercial greenhouses may be social parasites , 2004 .

[73]  P. Kryger,et al.  LACK OF WORKER POLICING IN THE CAPE HONEYBEE (APIS MELLIFERA CAPENSIS) , 1999 .

[74]  H. Velthuis,et al.  A case of multiple mating in stingless bees (Meliponinae) , 1998, Insectes Sociaux.

[75]  M. Beekman,et al.  Differential reproductive success among subfamilies in queenless honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) colonies , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[76]  K. Foster,et al.  Conflict resolution in insect societies. , 2006, Annual review of entomology.

[77]  B. Oldroyd,et al.  Effects of carbon dioxide narcosis on ovary activation and gene expression in worker honeybees, Apis mellifera , 2005, Journal of insect science.

[78]  R. Dukas,et al.  Honey bees recognize development of nestmates' ovaries , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[79]  M. Beekman,et al.  Insect behaviour: Parasitic honeybees get royal treatment , 2000, Nature.

[80]  W. Boot,et al.  Differential feeding of worker larvae affects caste characters in the Cape honeybee, Apis mellifera capensis , 2003, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[81]  R. Crewe,et al.  Honeybee queen tergal gland secretion affects ovarian development in caged workers , 1999 .

[82]  B. Oldroyd,et al.  Asian Honey Bees: Biology, Conservation, and Human Interactions , 2006 .

[83]  B. Hölldobler,et al.  Cuticular hydrocarbons mediate discrimination of reproductives and nonreproductives in the ant Myrmecia gulosa , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[84]  M. Beekman,et al.  Effects of cross-feeding anarchistic and wild type honey bees: anarchistic workers are not queen-like , 2003, Naturwissenschaften.

[85]  G. Robinson,et al.  Annotated expressed sequence tags and cDNA microarrays for studies of brain and behavior in the honey bee. , 2002, Genome research.

[86]  Wolf Excels Occurrence and Significance of Vitellogenins in Female Castes of Social Hymenoptera , 1974 .

[87]  T. Wenseleers,et al.  Worker reproduction and policing in insect societies: an ESS analysis , 2004, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[88]  H. Hepburn,et al.  Social parasitism by honeybee workers (Apis mellifera capensis Escholtz): host finding and resistance of hybrid host colonies , 2001 .

[89]  J. Strassmann,et al.  Mate number, kin selection and social conflicts in stingless bees and honeybees , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[90]  G. Robinson,et al.  The effect of queen-worker conflict on caste determination in the bumblebee Bombus terrestris , 2000, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[91]  Francis L. W. Ratnieks,et al.  Cape honeybees, Apis mellifera capensis, police worker-laid eggs despite the absence of relatedness benefits , 2003 .

[92]  J. Cornuet,et al.  Anarchy in the beehive , 1994, Nature.

[93]  Francis L. W. Ratnieks,et al.  Worker policing in the honeybee , 1989, Nature.

[94]  F. Ratnieks,et al.  Role of hydrocarbons in egg recognition in the honeybee , 2004 .

[95]  M. Brian Caste Determination in Social Insects , 1957 .

[96]  F. Ratnieks Reproductive Harmony via Mutual Policing by Workers in Eusocial Hymenoptera , 1988, The American Naturalist.

[97]  A. Hefetz,et al.  Does the queen win it all? Queen–worker conflict over male production in the bumblebee, Bombus terrestris , 2004, Naturwissenschaften.

[98]  T. Wenseleers,et al.  Comparative Analysis of Worker Reproduction and Policing in Eusocial Hymenoptera Supports Relatedness Theory , 2006, The American Naturalist.

[99]  J. Free,et al.  Further experiments on the drifting of honey-bees , 1961, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[100]  Andrew B. Barron,et al.  Worker policing and worker reproduction in Apis cerana , 2001, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[101]  B. Oldroyd,et al.  The reproductive dilemmas of queenless red dwarf honeybee (Apis florea) workers , 2006, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[102]  K. Foster,et al.  Kin selection is the key to altruism. , 2006, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[103]  H. Kern Reeve,et al.  Conflict in single-queen hymenopteran societies : the structure of conflict and processes that reduce conflict in advanced eusocial species , 1992 .

[104]  F. Ratnieks,et al.  The timing of worker reproduction and breakdown of policing behaviour in queenless honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) societies , 2001, Insectes Sociaux.