The impact and management of cognitive gap in high performance product development organizations

The close alignment of applied research and development units with manufacturing operational structures can provide excellent opportunities for maintaining robust product pipelines and reducing product development cycle times. Within such an integrated organizational model (IOM), however, lies a potentially disruptive psychological mechanism that can lead to the dissolution of this delicate partnership if it is not handled properly. This mechanism is cognitive gap, which can take several basic forms: first, as differences between the nature and difficulty of the problem at hand and the cognitive resources of the problem solvers tasked with its solution; and second, as differences between the cognitive abilities and approaches of the problem solvers themselves. In this paper, we define and discuss cognitive gap within the context of Kirton's Adaption-Innovation theory, a useful framework for understanding problem solving (and problem solvers) in general. Specific implications (both favourable and potentially destructive) of cognitive gaps for high performance product development organizations are discussed, and suggestions for their effective management are offered.

[1]  David A. Nadler,et al.  Competing By Design , 1997 .

[2]  Marián Kubeŝ,et al.  Dynamics of Innovation: Understanding and Influencing Communication Behaviours , 1992 .

[3]  D. Dougherty,et al.  Sustained product innovation in large, mature organizations: Overcoming innovation-to-organization problems. , 1996 .

[4]  M. Kirton,et al.  A Psychometric Reexamination of Kolb'S Experiential Learning Cycle Construct: A Separation of Level, Style, and Process , 1996 .

[5]  Harold H. Anderson,et al.  Creativity and Its Cultivation , 1961 .

[6]  Peter M. Allen,et al.  Innovation in manufacturing as an evolutionary complex system , 2005 .

[7]  W. E. Holland,et al.  A Cross-Validation Study of the Kirton Adaption-Innovation Inventory in Three Research and Development Organizations , 1978 .

[8]  Marián Kubeš,et al.  Adaptors and innovators in Slovakia: cognitive style and social culture , 1998 .

[9]  Kathryn Weed Jablokow,et al.  Project Team Dynamics and Cognitive Style , 2002 .

[10]  Gordon R. Foxall,et al.  Marketing and Non‐marketing Managers , 1990 .

[11]  Marjorie E. Adams,et al.  Enhancing New Product Development Performance: An Organizational Learning Perspective , 1998 .

[12]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organization Theory and Design , 1983 .

[13]  B. Tuckman,et al.  Stages of Small-Group Development Revisited , 1977 .

[14]  Deborah Dougherty,et al.  Reimagining the Differentiation and Integration of Work for Sustained Product Innovation , 2001 .

[15]  K. J. Evans,et al.  Adaptors and Innovators: Styles of Creativity and Problem-solving , 1990 .

[16]  Gordon R. Foxall,et al.  Cognitive style, personal involvement and situation as determinants of computer use , 1991 .

[17]  E. Holly Buttner,et al.  Entrepreneurs' Problem-Solving Styles: An Empirical Study Using the Kirton Adaption/innovation Theory , 1993 .

[18]  Samuel Mudd.  Kirton's A–I theory: Evidence bearing on the style/level and factor composition issues , 1996 .

[19]  E. A. Lowe,et al.  Creativity in Life Sciences Research , 1986 .

[20]  Ronald E. Goldsmith,et al.  Adaption—innovation and creativity: A replication and extension , 1987 .

[21]  S. Hammond.  Some pitfalls in the use of factor scores: The case of the Kirton adaption-innovation inventory , 1986 .

[22]  Kathryn Weed Jablokow,et al.  The catalytic nature of science: Implications for scientific problem solving in the 21st century , 2005 .

[23]  David Caldwell,et al.  Improving the Performance of New Product Teams , 2007, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[24]  Stanley E. Fawcett,et al.  Product and employee development in advanced manufacturing: Implementation and impact , 2001 .

[25]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  Into the black box: the knowledge transformation cycle , 2003, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[26]  M. Kirton.  Adaptors and Innovators: A Description and Measure. , 1976 .

[27]  R. G. Clapp,et al.  Stability of Cognitive Style in Adults and Some Implications, a Longitudinal Study of the Kirton Adaption-Innovation Inventory , 1993 .

[28]  David Chan,et al.  Cognitive Misfit of Problem-Solving Style at Work: A Facet of Person-Organization Fit , 1996 .

[29]  Myers,et al.  Gifts Differing: Understanding Personality Type , 1980 .

[30]  P. Romer,et al.  Should the Government Subsidize Supply or Demand in the Market for Scientists and Engineers? , 2000, Innovation Policy and the Economy.

[31]  Harry Boer,et al.  Proceedings of the 13th International Product Development Management Conference , 2005 .

[32]  K. Lewin,et al.  Field Theory in Social Science: Selected Theoretical Papers , 1951 .

[33]  A. Koestler.  The Act of Creation , 1964 .

[34]  M. Kirton,et al.  Adaptors and Innovators in Organizations , 1980 .

[35]  M. Kirton,et al.  The Adaption-Innovation Continuum, Occupational Type, and Course Selection , 1982 .

[36]  Muayyad Jabri,et al.  The Development of Conceptually Independent Subscales in the Measurement of Modes of Problem Solving , 1991 .

[37]  Roy Payne,et al.  Individual differences and performance amongst R and D personnel: Some implications for management development , 1987 .

[38]  R. Florida,et al.  Gaining from Green Management: Environmental Management Systems inside and outside the Factory , 2001 .

[39]  John Sample,et al.  The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and OD: Implication for Practice from Research , 2004 .

[40]  R. Daft.  A Dual-Core Model of Organizational Innovation , 1978 .

[41]  William Winchell.  Continuous Quality Improvement: A Manufacturing Professional's Guide , 1991 .

[42]  Ross F. Hill.  The impact of problem-solving styles on problem-solving behaviour, interpersonal relations, and job satisfaction in small workgroups , 1992 .

[43]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Managing the Ties Between Central R&D and Business Units , 2003 .

[44]  P. Borthwick,et al.  Matching Styles: A Historical Look. , 1984 .

[45]  Gordon R. Foxall,et al.  Consumer Initiators: Adaptors and Innovators , 1994 .

[46]  D. Tjosvold,et al.  Team learning from mistakes : the contribution of cooperative goals and problem-solving , 2004 .

[47]  John R. Austin.  Transactive memory in organizational groups: the effects of content, consensus, specialization, and accuracy on group performance. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[48]  J.D. Sterman,et al.  Nobody Ever Gets Credit for Fixing Problems That Never Happened: Creating and Sustaining Process Improvement , 2001, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[49]  M. J. Kirton.  M. J. Kirton's Reply to R. L. Payne's Article ‘Individual differences & performance of R and D personnel , 1987 .

[50]  Peter K. Hammerschmidt,et al.  The Kirton Adaption Innovation Inventory Find Group Problem Solving Success Rates , 1996 .

[51]  Peter Fraser,et al.  Shifting paradigms of product development in fast and dynamic markets , 2005, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[52]  M O King,et al.  A Comparison between Scores on Kirton's Inventory for Nursing Students and a General Student Population , 1993, Psychological reports.

[53]  Andrew B. Hargadon,et al.  Building an innovation factory. , 2000, Harvard business review.

[54]  M. Kirton,et al.  Personal and Group Estimates of the Kirton Inventory Scores , 1985 .

[55]  Tudor Rickards,et al.  Felix and Oscar Revisited: An Exploration of the Dynamics of a Real-Life Odd Couple Work Relationship , 1994 .

[56]  J. Kagan.  Reflection--impulsivity: the generality and dynamics of conceptual tempo. , 1966, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[57]  R. G. Clapp,et al.  Adaptors and Innovators in Large Organizations: Does Cognitive Style Characterize Actual Behavior of Employees at Work? An Exploratory Study , 1989 .

[58]  Peter K. Mills,et al.  Managerial practices that enhance innovation , 1985 .

[59]  M. Kirton,et al.  Styles of Creativity: Test-Score Correlations between Kirton Adaption-Innovation Inventory and Myers-Briggs Type Indicator , 1982 .

[60]  Judith Ann Love.  Design engineering success in a high-technology environment : its prediction and rewards , 1985 .

[61]  Deborah G. . Ancona,et al.  Bridging the Boundary: External Activity and Performance in Organizational Teams. , 1992 .

[62]  Graham Thompson,et al.  Managing uncertainty in the design and development process by appropriate methods selection , 2002 .

[63]  Geir Kaufmann,et al.  Two Kinds of Creativity - But Which Ones? , 2004 .

[64]  H. M. Schroder,et al.  Conceptual systems and personality organization , 1963 .

[65]  George Hayward,et al.  Adaptors and innovators: Data from the Kirton Adaptor‐Innovator Inventory in a local authority setting , 1983 .

[66]  E J Butter,et al.  Visual and haptic training and cross-modal transfer of reflectivity. , 1979, Journal of educational psychology.

[67]  K. Weick,et al.  Loosely Coupled Systems: A Reconceptualization , 1990 .

[68]  Allen Newell,et al.  Elements of a theory of human problem solving. , 1958 .

[69]  I. B. Myers.  Manual: A Guide to the Development and Use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator , 1985 .

[70]  Yaacov Rand,et al.  The dynamic assessment of retarded performers: The learning potential assessment device, theory, instruments and techniques , 1981 .

[71]  G. Lynn,et al.  The Role of Personality in New Product Development Team Performance , 2002 .

[72]  Deborah G. Ancona,et al.  The Comparative Advantage of X-Teams , 2002 .

[73]  Mike Danilovic,et al.  A tentative framework for analyzing integration in collaborative manufacturing network settings : A case study , 2005 .

[74]  P. A. Holland,et al.  Adaptors and Innovators: Selection versus Induction , 1991 .

[75]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[76]  H. A. Witkin.  THE ROLE OF COGNITIVE STYLE IN ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AND IN TEACHER‐STUDENT RELATIONS12 , 1973 .

[77]  Susan L. Kichuk,et al.  The big five personality factors and team performance: implications for selecting successful product design teams , 1997 .

[78]  D. Brinkman,et al.  Problem Finding, Creativity Style and the Musical Compositions of High School Students. , 1999 .

[79]  R. Sternberg,et al.  Perspectives on thinking, learning, and cognitive styles , 2001 .

[80]  C Del Miglio,et al.  Field dependence and characteristics of conceptualization in identical twins. , 1996, Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae.

[81]  G. Northcraft,et al.  You have printed the following article : Why Differences Make a Difference : A Field Study of Diversity , Conflict , and Performance in Workgroups , 2007 .

[82]  Philip R. Lindsay.  Counselling to resolve a clash of cognitive styles , 1985 .