What Is a "Good" Periocular Region for Recognition?

In challenging image acquisition settings where the performance of iris recognition algorithms degrades due to poor segmentation of the iris, image blur, specular reflections, and occlusions from eye lids and eye lashes, the periocular region has been shown to offer better recognition rates. However, the definition of a periocular region is subject to interpretation. This paper investigates the question of what is the best periocular region for recognition by identifying sub-regions of the ocular image when using near-infrared (NIR) or visible light (VL) sensors. To determine the best periocular region, we test two fundamentally different algorithms on challenging periocular datasets of contrasting build on four different periocular regions. Our results indicate that system performance does not necessarily improve as the ocular region becomes larger. Rather in NIR images the eye shape is more important than the brow or cheek as the image has little to no skin texture (leading to a smaller accepted region), while in VL images the brow is very important (requiring a larger region).

[1]  Ching Y. Suen,et al.  Investigating age invariant face recognition based on periocular biometrics , 2011, 2011 International Joint Conference on Biometrics (IJCB).

[2]  Damon L. Woodard,et al.  Periocular region appearance cues for biometric identification , 2010, 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition - Workshops.

[3]  Arun Ross,et al.  On the Fusion of Periocular and Iris Biometrics in Non-ideal Imagery , 2010, 2010 20th International Conference on Pattern Recognition.

[4]  Arun Ross,et al.  Matching highly non-ideal ocular images: An information fusion approach , 2012, 2012 5th IAPR International Conference on Biometrics (ICB).

[5]  Hugo Proença,et al.  Periocular recognition: Analysis of performance degradation factors , 2012, 2012 5th IAPR International Conference on Biometrics (ICB).

[6]  Arun Ross,et al.  Periocular Biometrics in the Visible Spectrum , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.

[7]  B. V. K. Vijaya Kumar,et al.  A comparative evaluation of iris and ocular recognition methods on challenging ocular images , 2011, 2011 International Joint Conference on Biometrics (IJCB).

[8]  Andrea Vedaldi,et al.  Vlfeat: an open and portable library of computer vision algorithms , 2010, ACM Multimedia.

[9]  K. R. Radhika,et al.  The eye says it all: Periocular region methodologies , 2012, 2012 International Conference on Multimedia Computing and Systems.

[10]  Kar-Ann Toh,et al.  On projection-based methods for periocular identity verification , 2012, 2012 7th IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications (ICIEA).

[11]  Damon L. Woodard,et al.  Performance evaluation of local appearance based periocular recognition , 2010, 2010 Fourth IEEE International Conference on Biometrics: Theory, Applications and Systems (BTAS).

[12]  Marios Savvides,et al.  Robust local binary pattern feature sets for periocular biometric identification , 2010, 2010 Fourth IEEE International Conference on Biometrics: Theory, Applications and Systems (BTAS).

[13]  Arif Mahmood,et al.  Periocular biometric recognition using image sets , 2013, 2013 IEEE Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV).

[14]  B. V. K. Vijaya Kumar,et al.  A Bayesian Approach to Deformed Pattern Matching of Iris Images , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[15]  Damon L. Woodard,et al.  Human and Machine Performance on Periocular Biometrics Under Near-Infrared Light and Visible Light , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.

[16]  G LoweDavid,et al.  Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints , 2004 .

[17]  Marios Savvides,et al.  An exploration of gender identification using only the periocular region , 2010, 2010 Fourth IEEE International Conference on Biometrics: Theory, Applications and Systems (BTAS).