Rapid evaluation of coaxiality of shaft parts based on double maximum material requirements

Abstract Simultaneous application of the maximum material requirements on the datum and coaxiality tolerances (referred to as DMMR coaxiality) of shaft parts can ensure assembly and reduce costs. Existing DMMR coaxiality evaluations use either inflexible real functional gauges or slow mathematical methods, which limits the applications of such a good tolerance in industry. This paper investigated a fast mathematical evaluation method for DMMR coaxiality. First, according to ISO requirements, the geometry and utility of the real functional gauge were analyzed. Then, an adaptive virtual gauge (AVG) was established, and the geometric structure and motion of the AVG were analyzed. After that, the mathematical evaluation method of the DMMR coaxiality tolerance was provided with uncertainty analysis. Finally, an exemplary application on a stepped shaft was presented, and the accuracy and speed of the method were reflected and improved by comparison with existing methods.

[1]  Rosario Domingo,et al.  Vectorial method of minimum zone tolerance for flatness, straightness, and their uncertainty estimation , 2014 .

[2]  G. He,et al.  Profile error evaluation of free-form surface using sequential quadratic programming algorithm , 2017 .

[3]  Guanghua Xu,et al.  Least squares evaluations for form and profile errors of ellipse using coordinate data , 2016 .

[4]  Qing Zhang,et al.  Minimum zone evaluation of sphericity deviation based on the intersecting chord method in Cartesian coordinate system , 2016 .

[5]  Long Jin,et al.  Roundness Error Evaluation Based on Differential Evolution Algorithm , 2014 .

[6]  Peng Zheng,et al.  Research of the On-Line Evaluating the Cylindricity Error Technology Based on the New Generation of GPS , 2017 .

[7]  Jing Huang,et al.  Coaxiality evaluation based on double material condition , 2019, Measurement.

[8]  Igor Drstvenšek,et al.  Reverse Engineering of Parts with Optical Scanning and Additive Manufacturing , 2014 .

[9]  Cao Zhimin,et al.  Roundness deviation evaluation method based on statistical analysis of local least square circles , 2017 .

[10]  Peng Li,et al.  A hybrid method based on reduced constraint region and convex-hull edge for flatness error evaluation , 2016 .

[11]  Vimal Kumar Pathak,et al.  Evaluating Geometric Characteristics of Planar Surfaces using Improved Particle Swarm Optimization , 2017 .

[12]  Milan Delić,et al.  Evaluating minimum zone flatness error using new method—Bundle of plains through one point , 2016 .