A Prospective One-Year Outcome Study of Interdisciplinary Chronic Pain Management: Compromising Its Efficacy by Managed Care Policies

Although interdisciplinary pain management programs are both therapeutically effective as well as cost-effective, they are currently being underutilized because of managed care policies. We used this prospective comparison trial, with 1-yr follow-up of chronic pain patients, to demonstrate the short- and long-term efficacy of an interdisciplinary pain management program, and evaluate the impact of managed care’s physical therapy “carve out” practices on these treatment outcomes. Consecutive chronic pain patients (n = 201) were evaluated, some of whom had their physical therapy “carved out” from this integrated program. Results revealed that successful completion of interdisciplinary pain management was therapeutically effective. Most importantly, physical therapy “carved out” practices had a negative impact on both the short-term and 1-yr follow-up outcome measures. Thus, interdisciplinary pain management is effective in treating the major health problem of chronic pain. However, insurance carrier policies of contracting treatment “carve outs” significantly compromise the efficacy of this evidence-based, best standard of medical care treatment. This raises important medico-legal and ethical issues.

[1]  T. Rudy,et al.  West Haven Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory , 1995 .

[2]  D. Turk Clinical Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Treatments for Patients With Chronic Pain , 2002, The Clinical journal of pain.

[3]  R. Sturm,et al.  Who leaves managed behavioral health care? , 1999, The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research.

[4]  D. Turk,et al.  The West Haven-Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory (WHYMPI) , 1985, Pain.

[5]  Handbook of Pain Syndromes , 2000, Journal of health psychology.

[6]  J. Ware SF-36 health survey: Manual and interpretation guide , 2003 .

[7]  R. Jamison,et al.  Perceived treatment helpfulness and cost in chronic pain rehabilitation. , 2000, The Clinical journal of pain.

[8]  C. Eccleston,et al.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of cognitive behaviour therapy and behaviour therapy for chronic pain in adults, excluding headache , 1999, Pain.

[9]  T. Mayer,et al.  A prospective short-term study of chronic low back pain patients utilizing novel objective functional measurement , 1986, Pain.

[10]  R. Gatchel,et al.  [Psychosocial Factors in Pain: Critical Perspectives] , 1999 .

[11]  K. H. Nilsen,et al.  Evaluation of low back pain and assessment of lumbar corsets with and without back supports. , 1981, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[12]  O. Knüsel,et al.  Effectiveness of in-patient rehabilitation for sub-chronic and chronic low back pain by an integrative group treatment program (Swiss Multicentre Study). , 1998, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[13]  A. Rush,et al.  Depression and chronic low back pain: establishing priorities in treatment. , 2000, Spine.

[14]  R. Jamison,et al.  Treatment helpfulness questionnaire: a measure of patient satisfaction with treatment modalities provided in chronic pain management programs , 1996, Pain.

[15]  A. Beck,et al.  Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: Twenty-five years of evaluation , 1988 .

[16]  M. Erjavec,et al.  Prescription opiate abuse in chronic pain patients: clinical criteria, incidence, and predictors. , 1997, The Clinical journal of pain.

[17]  H. Merskey,et al.  Randomised trial of oral morphine for chronic non-cancer pain , 1996, The Lancet.

[18]  T. Roche The potent perils of a miracle drug. , 2001, Time.

[19]  J C Fairbank,et al.  The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. , 1980, Physiotherapy.

[20]  H. Flor,et al.  Efficacy of multidisciplinary pain treatment centers: a meta-analytic review , 1992, Pain.

[21]  S. Wessely,et al.  Medication misuse, abuse and dependence in chronic pain patients. , 1997, Journal of psychosomatic research.