Quantum erasers and probing classifications of entanglement via nuclear magnetic resonance
暂无分享,去创建一个
Timothy F. Havel | David G. Cory | Evan M. Fortunato | Marco A. Pravia | D. Cory | M. Pravia | Y. Sharf | E. Fortunato | G. Teklemariam | Yehuda Sharf | Grum Teklemariam | A. Bhattaharyya | J. Hou | J. Hou | A. Bhattaharyya
[1] M. Scully,et al. Quantum eraser: A proposed photon correlation experiment concerning observation and , 1982 .
[2] Timothy F. Havel,et al. A study of quantum error correction by geometric algebra and liquid-state NMR spectroscopy , 2000, quant-ph/0004030.
[3] Timothy F. Havel,et al. Expressing the operations of quantum computing in multiparticle geometric algebra , 1998 .
[4] Herzog,et al. Complementarity and the quantum eraser. , 1995, Physical review letters.
[5] Robert Garisto,et al. Entanglement of projection and a new class of quantum erasers , 1999 .
[6] R Laflamme,et al. Experimental Realization of Noiseless Subsystems for Quantum Information Processing , 2001, Science.
[7] John S. Waugh,et al. Theory of broadband spin decoupling , 1982 .
[8] Timothy F. Havel,et al. Design of strongly modulating pulses to implement precise effective Hamiltonians for quantum information processing , 2002, quant-ph/0202065.
[9] J. Cirac,et al. Three qubits can be entangled in two inequivalent ways , 2000, quant-ph/0005115.
[10] Observations of quantum dynamics by solution-state NMR spectroscopy , 1999, quant-ph/9905061.
[11] Lorenza Viola,et al. Hadamard products of product operators and the design of gradient-diffusion experiments for simulating decoherence by NMR spectroscopy , 2000, quant-ph/0009010.
[12] Timothy F. Havel,et al. NMR Based Quantum Information Processing: Achievements and Prospects , 2000, quant-ph/0004104.
[13] Jean-Michel Raimond,et al. Reversible Decoherence of a Mesoscopic Superposition of Field States , 1997 .
[14] David G. Cory,et al. A generalized k-space formalism for treating the spatial aspects of a variety of NMR experiments , 1998 .
[15] Steinberg,et al. Three proposed "quantum erasers" , 1994, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.
[16] B. Englert,et al. Quantum optical tests of complementarity , 1991, Nature.
[17] J. Eisert,et al. Schmidt measure as a tool for quantifying multiparticle entanglement , 2000, quant-ph/0007081.
[18] Timothy F. Havel,et al. Principles and Demonstrations of Quantum Information Processing by NMR Spectroscopy , 2000, Applicable Algebra in Engineering, Communication and Computing.
[19] W. Wootters,et al. Entangled Rings , 2000, quant-ph/0009041.
[20] E Knill,et al. Efficient refocusing of one-spin and two-spin interactions for NMR quantum computation. , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance.
[21] Timothy F. Havel,et al. Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy: an experimentally accessible paradigm for quantum computing , 1997, quant-ph/9709001.
[22] E M Fortunato,et al. NMR analog of the quantum disentanglement eraser. , 2001, Physical review letters.
[23] N. Christensen,et al. Potential multiparticle entanglement measure , 2000, quant-ph/0010052.
[24] Seth Lloyd,et al. Experimental demonstration of greenberger-horne-zeilinger correlations using nuclear magnetic resonance , 2000 .
[25] D. Leung,et al. Experimental realization of a quantum algorithm , 1998, Nature.