Feasibility of deep learning-based tumor segmentation for target delineation and response assessment in grade-4 glioma using multi-parametric MRI

Abstract Background Tumor burden assessment is essential for radiation therapy (RT), treatment response evaluation, and clinical decision-making. However, manual tumor delineation remains laborious and challenging due to radiological complexity. The objective of this study was to investigate the feasibility of the HD-GLIO tool, an ensemble of pre-trained deep learning models based on the nnUNet-algorithm, for tumor segmentation, response prediction, and its potential for clinical deployment. Methods We analyzed the predicted contrast-enhanced (CE) and non-enhancing (NE) HD-GLIO output in 49 multi-parametric MRI examinations from 23 grade-4 glioma patients. The volumes were retrospectively compared to corresponding manual delineations by 2 independent operators, before prospectively testing the feasibility of clinical deployment of HD-GLIO-output to a RT setting. Results For CE, median Dice scores were 0.81 (95% CI 0.71–0.83) and 0.82 (95% CI 0.74–0.84) for operator-1 and operator-2, respectively. For NE, median Dice scores were 0.65 (95% CI 0.56–0,69) and 0.63 (95% CI 0.57–0.67), respectively. Comparing volume sizes, we found excellent intra-class correlation coefficients of 0.90 (P < .001) and 0.95 (P < .001), for CE, respectively, and 0.97 (P < .001) and 0.90 (P < .001), for NE, respectively. Moreover, there was a strong correlation between response assessment in Neuro-Oncology volumes and HD-GLIO-volumes (P < .001, Spearman’s R2 = 0.83). Longitudinal growth relations between CE- and NE-volumes distinguished patients by clinical response: Pearson correlations of CE- and NE-volumes were 0.55 (P = .04) for responders, 0.91 (P > .01) for non-responders, and 0.80 (P = .05) for intermediate/mixed responders. Conclusions HD-GLIO was feasible for RT target delineation and MRI tumor volume assessment. CE/NE tumor-compartment growth correlation showed potential to predict clinical response to treatment.

[1]  Raymond Y Huang,et al.  AI-based decision support improves reproducibility of tumor response assessment in neuro-oncology: an international multi-reader study. , 2022, Neuro-oncology.

[2]  H. Sakurai,et al.  Peritumoral edema status of glioblastoma identifies patients reaching long-term disease control with specific progression patterns after tumor resection and high-dose proton boost , 2021, Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.

[3]  G. Reifenberger,et al.  The 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary. , 2021, Neuro-oncology.

[4]  Jens Petersen,et al.  nnU-Net: a self-configuring method for deep learning-based biomedical image segmentation , 2020, Nature Methods.

[5]  W. V. Elmpt,et al.  Overview of artificial intelligence-based applications in radiotherapy: recommendations for implementation and quality assurance. , 2020, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[6]  A. Lundervold,et al.  Sequential bortezomib and temozolomide treatment promotes immunological responses in glioblastoma patients with positive clinical outcomes: A phase 1B study , 2020, Immunity, inflammation and disease.

[7]  Nadya Shusharina,et al.  Automated delineation of the clinical target volume using anatomically constrained 3D expansion of the gross tumor volume. , 2020, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[8]  J. Steinbach,et al.  Delay in diagnosing patients with right-sided glioblastoma induced by hemispheric-specific clinical presentation , 2019, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[9]  S. Heiland,et al.  Automated quantitative tumour response assessment of MRI in neuro-oncology with artificial neural networks: a multicentre, retrospective study. , 2019, The Lancet. Oncology.

[10]  Bradley R Pieters,et al.  ESTRO ACROP consensus guideline on CT- and MRI-based target volume delineation for primary radiation therapy of localized prostate cancer. , 2018, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[11]  H. Wakimoto,et al.  IDH1 Mutation and World Health Organization 2016 Diagnostic Criteria for Adult Diffuse Gliomas: Advances in Surgical Strategy. , 2017, Neurosurgery.

[12]  Susan M. Chang,et al.  Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Clinical Trials. , 2017, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[13]  M. Davis Glioblastoma: Overview of Disease and Treatment. , 2016, Clinical journal of oncology nursing.

[14]  Li Kong,et al.  Delineation of radiation therapy target volumes for patients with postoperative glioblastoma: a review , 2016, OncoTargets and therapy.

[15]  G. Reifenberger,et al.  The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary , 2016, Acta Neuropathologica.

[16]  Marion Smits,et al.  Consensus recommendations for a standardized Brain Tumor Imaging Protocol in clinical trials. , 2015, Neuro-oncology.

[17]  J. Markert,et al.  Patterns of failure for glioblastoma multiforme following limited-margin radiation and concurrent temozolomide , 2014, Radiation oncology.

[18]  C. Filippi,et al.  Semiautomated Volumetric Measurement on Postcontrast MR Imaging for Analysis of Recurrent and Residual Disease in Glioblastoma Multiforme , 2014, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[19]  J. Crowley,et al.  Overview: Progression-Free Survival as an Endpoint in Clinical Trials with Solid Tumors , 2013, Clinical Cancer Research.

[20]  D. Amelio,et al.  Patterns of failure and comparison of different target volume delineations in patients with glioblastoma treated with conformal radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide. , 2010, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[21]  P. Wen,et al.  Response criteria for glioma , 2008, Nature Clinical Practice Oncology.

[22]  D. Nelson,et al.  Phase II Radiation Therapy Oncology Group trial of conventional radiation therapy followed by treatment with recombinant interferon-beta for supratentorial glioblastoma: results of RTOG 9710. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[23]  Guido Gerig,et al.  User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: Significantly improved efficiency and reliability , 2006, NeuroImage.

[24]  Martin J. van den Bent,et al.  Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[25]  R. Mirimanoff,et al.  MGMT gene silencing and benefit from temozolomide in glioblastoma. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[26]  Susan M. Chang,et al.  Prognostic factors for survival of patients with glioblastoma: recursive partitioning analysis. , 2004, Neuro-oncology.

[27]  A G Sorensen,et al.  Comparison of diameter and perimeter methods for tumor volume calculation. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[28]  Susan M. Chang,et al.  Pseudoprogression in Neuro-Oncology: Overview, Pathophysiology, and Interpretation , 2016 .

[29]  Claus Belka,et al.  ESTRO-ACROP guideline "target delineation of glioblastomas". , 2016, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[30]  P. Mattila Hausdorff dimension of projections and distance sets , 2015 .

[31]  Y H Chan,et al.  Biostatistics 104: correlational analysis. , 2003, Singapore medical journal.