Interrupter technique and pressure oscillation analysis during bronchoconstriction in children

The use of interrupter resistance (Rint) is a feasible method of measuring bronchodilator responsiveness and bronchial hyperresponsiveness in preschool children. It has been suggested that analysis of recorded oscillations of the mouth pressure may provide additional indices of changes in airway mechanics. The aim of our study was to determine whether amplitude or damping properties of oscillations were more sensitive than Rint in describing changes during bronchoconstriction. Data from 44 children (24 boys) who completed tripling dose methacholine (Mch) challenge were analysed. The median (range) age of children was 4·9 (3·1–6·1 years). In addition to baseline and maximal Rint after Mch [mean (SD) were 0·92 (0·19) and 1·44 (0·35) kPa l−1 s, respectively], obtained from a commercial device we analysed the following parameters: difference between the first maximum and minimum (AMxMn), maximum instantaneous amplitude (Ainst), amplitudes of fitted mathematical model and the dominant frequency, sum of frequency component amplitudes, two damping factors and frequency. All amplitude parameters changed significantly after Mch. For comparison of the decrease in amplitudes and increase in Rint we additionally used reciprocals of amplitudes. Using the sensitivity index (SI) i.e. the change after intervention divided by the baseline SD, 1/Ainst and 1/AMxMn were the most sensitive indices to describe the change (with median SI of 6·29 and 6·28, respectively). Rint had a median SI of 5·13. Frequency and damping factors were less sensitive, with median SI values <1. These findings suggest that oscillation amplitude analysis implemented in the software of commercial devices could have further applications in assessing respiratory mechanics.

[1]  C. Pao,et al.  Airway resistance by the interrupter technique: Which algorithm for measuring pressure? , 2004, Pediatric pulmonology.

[2]  J G Martin,et al.  The effect of a proximal compliance on interrupter measurements of resistance. , 1987, Respiration physiology.

[3]  M. Silverman,et al.  Accuracy and sensitivity of the interrupter technique for measuring the response to bronchial challenge in normal subjects. , 1993, The European respiratory journal.

[4]  D. Wertheim,et al.  How should we estimate driving pressure to measure interrupter resistance in children? , 2007, Pediatric pulmonology.

[5]  C. K. van der Ent,et al.  Applicability of interrupter resistance measurements using the MicroRint in daily practice. , 2003, Respiratory medicine.

[6]  S. Ranganathan,et al.  Measurement of airway resistance using the interrupter technique in preschool children in the ambulatory setting. , 1999, The European respiratory journal.

[7]  M. Silverman,et al.  Evaluation of the interrupter technique for measuring change in airway resistance in 5‐year‐old asthmatic children , 1995, Pediatric pulmonology.

[8]  R Kraemer,et al.  Oscillatory pressure transients after flow interruption during bronchial challenge test in children. , 1997, The European respiratory journal.

[9]  A Charloux,et al.  Interrupter technique versus plethysmography for measurement of respiratory resistance in children with asthma or cystic fibrosis , 2000, Pediatric pulmonology.

[10]  Wiley Interscience,et al.  Feasibility of Shortened Methacholine Challenge in Preschool Children , 2006, Pediatric pulmonology.

[11]  R. Kraemer,et al.  Interrelationship between postocclusional oscillatory pressure transients and standard lung function in healthy and asthmatic children , 1995, Pediatric pulmonology.

[12]  I. Dundas,et al.  Repeatability of airway resistance measurements made using the interrupter technique , 2003, Thorax.

[13]  H. Bisgaard,et al.  Measurement of lung function in awake 2–4‐year‐old asthmatic children during methacholine challenge and acute asthma: A comparison of the impulse oscillation technique, the interrupter technique, and transcutaneous measurement of oxygen versus whole‐body plethysmography , 1996, Pediatric pulmonology.

[14]  M. Silverman,et al.  Evaluation of a new interrupter device for measuring bronchial responsiveness and the response to bronchodilator in 3 year old children. , 1996, The European respiratory journal.

[15]  I. Dundas,et al.  Airway resistance measured by the interrupter technique: normative data for 2–10 year olds of three ethnicities , 2002, Archives of disease in childhood.

[16]  Janet Stocks,et al.  An official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society statement: pulmonary function testing in preschool children. , 2007, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[17]  A. Jackson,et al.  A reevaluation of the interrupter technique for airway resistance measurement. , 1974, Journal of applied physiology.

[18]  R Kraemer,et al.  Pressure oscillations after flow interruption in relation to lung mechanics. , 1995, Respiration physiology.

[19]  A. Denjean,et al.  Interrupter resistance short-term repeatability and bronchodilator response in preschool children. , 2007, Respiratory medicine.

[20]  P Baconnier,et al.  A theoretical analysis of interrupter technique for measuring respiratory mechanics. , 1988, Journal of applied physiology.

[21]  D. Tibboel,et al.  Should we use criteria or eyeballing to reject post‐interruption tracings? , 2006, Pediatric pulmonology.

[22]  Shephard Rj MECHANICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE HUMAN AIRWAY IN RELATION TO USE OF THE INTERRUPTER VALVE. , 1963 .

[23]  C. Gaultier,et al.  Measurements of resistance by the interrupter technique and of transcutaneous partial pressure of oxygen in young children during methacholine challenge , 2001, Pediatric pulmonology.

[24]  J. Kivastik,et al.  Methacholine challenge in pre-school children--which outcome measure? , 2007, Respiratory medicine.

[25]  David Wertheim,et al.  Pressure Oscillation Amplitude after Interruption of Tidal Breathing as an Index of Change in Airway Mechanics in Preschool Children , 2005, Pediatric pulmonology.

[26]  B. Brunekreef,et al.  Short and long term variability of the interrupter technique under field and standardised conditions in 3–6 year old children , 2003, Thorax.

[27]  J. Fredberg,et al.  Interpretation of interrupter resistance after histamine-induced constriction in the dog. , 1990, Journal of applied physiology.

[28]  J. Bates,et al.  High-frequency characteristics of respiratory mechanics determined by flow interruption. , 1990, Journal of applied physiology.

[29]  J. Hankinson,et al.  Guidelines for methacholine and exercise challenge testing-1999. This official statement of the American Thoracic Society was adopted by the ATS Board of Directors, July 1999. , 2000, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.