Evaluating tumor heterogeneity in immunohistochemistry-stained breast cancer tissue

Quantitative clinical measurement of heterogeneity in immunohistochemistry staining would be useful in evaluating patient therapeutic response and in identifying underlying issues in histopathology laboratory quality control. A heterogeneity scoring approach (HetMap) was designed to visualize a individual patient's immunohistochemistry heterogeneity in the context of a patient population. HER2 semiquantitative analysis was combined with ecology diversity statistics to evaluate cell-level heterogeneity (consistency of protein expression within neighboring cells in a tumor nest) and tumor-level heterogeneity (differences of protein expression across a tumor as represented by a tissue section). This approach was evaluated on HER2 immunohistochemistry-stained breast cancer samples using 200 specimens across two different laboratories with three pathologists per laboratory, each outlining regions of tumor for scoring by automatic cell-based image analysis. HetMap was evaluated using three different scoring schemes: HER2 scoring according to American Society of Clinical Oncology and College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) guidelines, H-score, and a new continuous HER2 score (HER2cont). Two definitions of heterogeneity, cell-level and tumor-level, provided useful independent measures of heterogeneity. Cases where pathologists had disagreement over reads in the area of clinical importance (+1 and +2) had statistically significantly higher levels of tumor-level heterogeneity. Cell-level heterogeneity, reported either as an average or the maximum area of heterogeneity across a slide, had low levels of dependency on the pathologist choice of region, while tumor-level heterogeneity measurements had more dependence on the pathologist choice of regions. HetMap is a measure of heterogeneity, by which pathologists, oncologists, and drug development organizations can view cell-level and tumor-level heterogeneity for a patient for a given marker in the context of an entire patient cohort. Heterogeneity analysis can be used to identify tumors with differing degrees of heterogeneity, or to highlight slides that should be rechecked for QC issues. Tumor heterogeneity plays a significant role in disconcordant reads between pathologists.

[1]  K. Polyak,et al.  Tumor heterogeneity: causes and consequences. , 2010, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[2]  E. H. Simpson Measurement of Diversity , 1949, Nature.

[3]  Anthony Rhodes,et al.  American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer. , 2007, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[4]  T. D’alfonso,et al.  Accurately Assessing HER-2/neu Status in Needle Core Biopsies of Breast Cancer Patients in the Era of Neoadjuvant Therapy: Emerging Questions and Considerations Addressed , 2010, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[5]  Ross Ihaka,et al.  Gentleman R: R: A language for data analysis and graphics , 1996 .

[6]  S. Weinhouse Discussion of Doctor Greenstein's paper. , 1956, Cancer research.

[7]  D. Rimm,et al.  Automated quantitative analysis (AQUA) of in situ protein expression, antibody concentration, and prognosis. , 2005, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[8]  K. Schaefer,et al.  Prevalence and Heterogeneity of KRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA Mutations in Primary Colorectal Adenocarcinomas and Their Corresponding Metastases , 2010, Clinical Cancer Research.

[9]  L. Huo HER2 Testing by Local, Central, and Reference Laboratories in Specimens From the North Central Cancer Treatment Group N9831 Intergroup Adjuvant Trial , 2007 .

[10]  D. Knowles,et al.  Intratumoral Heterogeneity of HER-2/neu in Invasive Mammary Carcinomas Using Fluorescence In-Situ Hybridization and Tissue Microarray , 2006, International journal of surgical pathology.

[11]  K. Polyak,et al.  Breast tumor heterogeneity: causes and consequences , 2009, Breast Cancer Research.

[12]  Marc K Halushka,et al.  Intratumoral heterogeneity of HER-2 gene amplification and protein overexpression in breast cancer. , 2010, Human pathology.

[13]  K. Allison,et al.  Frequency of HER2 heterogeneity by fluorescence in situ hybridization according to CAP expert panel recommendations: time for a new look at how to report heterogeneity. , 2011, American journal of clinical pathology.

[14]  H. Grabsch,et al.  HER2 Expression in Gastric Cancer: Rare, Heterogeneous and of No Prognostic Value – Conclusions from 924 Cases of Two Independent Series , 2010, Cellular oncology : the official journal of the International Society for Cellular Oncology.

[15]  Dihua Yu,et al.  Molecular predictors of response to trastuzumab and lapatinib in breast cancer , 2010, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[16]  N. Jhala,et al.  Using a higher cutoff for the percentage of HER2+ cells decreases interobserver variability in the interpretation of HER2 immunohistochemical analysis. , 2008, American journal of clinical pathology.

[17]  Calyampudi R. Rao Diversity and dissimilarity coefficients: A unified approach☆ , 1982 .

[18]  U. Lehmann,et al.  Marked Intratumoral Heterogeneity of c-myc and CyclinD1 But Not of c-erbB2 Amplification in Breast Cancer , 2002, Laboratory Investigation.

[19]  E. Davila,et al.  The Clinical Importance of the Heterogeneity of HER2 neu , 2010, Case Reports in Oncology.

[20]  D. Visscher,et al.  Analysis of intratumoral heterogeneity and amplification status in breast carcinomas with equivocal (2+) HER-2 immunostaining. , 2005, American journal of clinical pathology.

[21]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[22]  A. Ruifrok,et al.  Quantification of histochemical staining by color deconvolution. , 2001, Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology.

[23]  Alastair I. Bartlett,et al.  Heterogeneous HER2 gene amplification: impact on patient outcome and a clinically relevant definition. , 2011, American journal of clinical pathology.

[24]  Sandrine Pavoine,et al.  The apportionment of quadratic entropy: a useful alternative for partitioning diversity in ecological data , 2005, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.

[25]  Hua Guo,et al.  PTEN, PIK3CA, p-AKT, and p-p70S6K status: association with trastuzumab response and survival in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. , 2010, The American journal of pathology.

[26]  W. Jochum,et al.  HER2 genetic heterogeneity in breast carcinoma , 2011, Journal of Clinical Pathology.

[27]  S. Fushida,et al.  Gastric cancer heterogeneity , 1989, Cancer.

[28]  M. Gönen,et al.  Cellular and genetic diversity in the progression of in situ human breast carcinomas to an invasive phenotype. , 2010, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[29]  Raymond R Tubbs,et al.  Genetic heterogeneity in HER2 testing in breast cancer: panel summary and guidelines. , 2009, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[30]  Charles Theillet,et al.  What do we learn from HER2-positive breast cancer genomic profiles? , 2010, Breast Cancer Research.