THE EFFECT OF WOLBACHIA VERSUS GENETIC INCOMPATIBILITIES ON REINFORCEMENT AND SPECIATION

Abstract Wolbachia is a widespread group of intracellular bacteria commonly found in arthropods. In many insect species, Wolbachia induce a cytoplasmic mating incompatibility (CI). If different Wolbachia infections occur in the same host species, bidirectional CI is often induced. Bidirectional CI acts as a postzygotic isolation mechanism if parapatric host populations are infected with different Wolbachia strains. Therefore, it has been suggested that Wolbachia could promote speciation in their hosts. In this article we investigate theoretically whether Wolbachia-induced bidirectional CI selects for premating isolation and therefore reinforces genetic divergence between parapatric host populations. To achieve this we combined models for Wolbachia dynamics with a well-studied reinforcement model. This new model allows us to compare the effect of bidirectional CI on the evolution of female mating preferences with a situation in which postzygotic isolation is caused by nuclear genetic incompatibilities (NI). We distinguish between nuclear incompatibilities caused by two loci with epistatic interactions, and a single locus with incompatibility among heterozygotes in the diploid phase. Our main findings are: (1) bidirectional CI and single locus NI select for premating isolation with a higher speed and for a wider parameter range than epistatic NI; (2) under certain parameter values, runaway sexual selection leads to the increase of an introduced female preference allele and fixation of its preferred male trait allele in both populations, whereas under others it leads to divergence in the two populations in preference and trait alleles; and (3) bidirectional CI and single locus NI can stably persist up to migration rates that are two times higher than seen for epistatic NI. The latter finding is important because the speed with which mutants at the preference locus spread increases exponentially with the migration rate. In summary, our results show that bidirectional CI selects for rapid premating isolation and so generally support the view that Wolbachia can promote speciation in their hosts.

[1]  J. Werren,et al.  Bidirectional cytoplasmic incompatibility and the stable coexistence of two Wolbachia strains in parapatric host populations. , 2005, Journal of theoretical biology.

[2]  J. Werren,et al.  Reproductive effects and geographical distributions of two Wolbachia strains infecting the Neotropical beetle, Chelymorpha alternans Boh. (Chrysomelidae, Cassidinae) , 2004, Molecular ecology.

[3]  N. Barton Fitness Landscapes and the Origin of Species , 2004 .

[4]  M. Noor,et al.  The role of reinforcement in speciation: Theory and data , 2003 .

[5]  M J Keeling,et al.  The invasion and coexistence of competing Wolbachia strains , 2003, Heredity.

[6]  Kevin J. Emerson,et al.  Wolbachia and genetic variability in the birdnest blowfly Protocalliphora sialia , 2003, Molecular ecology.

[7]  A. Navarro-Quezada,et al.  Genetic differentiation in the Agave deserti (Agavaceae) complex of the Sonoran desert , 2003, Heredity.

[8]  S. Bordenstein,et al.  Symbiosis and the Origin of Species , 2003 .

[9]  P. Hammerstein,et al.  The Effect of Wolbachia on Genetic Divergence between Populations: Models with Two‐Way Migration , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[10]  A. Weeks,et al.  Wolbachia dynamics and host effects: what has (and has not) been demonstrated? , 2002 .

[11]  W. Sullivan,et al.  Role of Delayed Nuclear Envelope Breakdown and Mitosis in Wolbachia-Induced Cytoplasmic Incompatibility , 2002, Science.

[12]  P. Hammerstein,et al.  Effects of Wolbachia on Genetic Divergence Between Populations: Mainland-Island Model1 , 2002, Integrative and comparative biology.

[13]  R. Giordano,et al.  Male-Killing, Nematode Infections, Bacteriophage Infection, and Virulence of Cytoplasmic Bacteria in the GenusWolbachia , 2001 .

[14]  Chung-I Wu The genic view of the process of speciation , 2001 .

[15]  M. Servedio,et al.  BEYOND REINFORCEMENT: THE EVOLUTION OF PREMATING ISOLATION BY DIRECT SELECTION ON PREFERENCES AND POSTMATING, PREZYGOTIC INCOMPATIBILITIES , 2001, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[16]  N. Barton,et al.  Theory and speciation. , 2001, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[17]  S. Bordenstein,et al.  Genotype‐by‐environment interaction and the Dobzhansky–Muller model of postzygotic isolation , 2001 .

[18]  J. Werren,et al.  Wolbachia-induced incompatibility precedes other hybrid incompatibilities in Nasonia , 2001, Nature.

[19]  M. Hoy,et al.  Long PCR improves Wolbachia DNA amplification: wsp sequences found in 76% of sixty‐three arthropod species , 2000, Insect molecular biology.

[20]  J. Werren,et al.  Wolbachia infection frequencies in insects: evidence of a global equilibrium? , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[21]  M. Servedio REINFORCEMENT AND THE GENETICS OF NONRANDOM MATING , 2000, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[22]  G. Roderick,et al.  Endless Forms – Species and Speciation , 2000, Heredity.

[23]  M Kirkpatrick,et al.  The reinforcement of mating preferences on an island. , 1999, Genetics.

[24]  M. Noor Reinforcement and other consequences of sympatry. , 1999, Heredity.

[25]  G. Hurst,et al.  Wolbachia pipientis: microbial manipulator of arthropod reproduction. , 1999, Annual review of microbiology.

[26]  M. Blaxter,et al.  Phylogeny of Wolbachia in filarial nematodes , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[27]  D. Poinsot,et al.  Wolbachia transfer from Drosophila melanogaster into D. simulans: Host effect and cytoplasmic incompatibility relationships. , 1998, Genetics.

[28]  M. Schilthuizen,et al.  Selfish genetic elements and speciation , 1998, Heredity.

[29]  J. Werren Biology of Wolbachia. , 2003, Annual review of entomology.

[30]  J. Breeuwer Wolbachia and cytoplasmic incompatibility in the spider mites Tetranychus urticae and T. turkestani , 1997, Heredity.

[31]  H. A. Orr,et al.  “PATTERNS OF SPECIATION IN DROSOPHILA” REVISITED , 1997, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[32]  Ary A. Hoffmann,et al.  Cytoplasmic incompatibility in insects , 1997 .

[33]  J. Werren,et al.  Distribution of Wolbachia among neotropical arthropods , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[34]  A. Atlan,et al.  Variability within the Seychelles cytoplasmic incompatibility system in Drosophila simulans. , 1995, Genetics.

[35]  M. Turelli,et al.  Cytoplasmic incompatibility in Drosophila simulans: dynamics and parameter estimates from natural populations. , 1995, Genetics.

[36]  J. Werren,et al.  Induction of paternal genome loss by the paternal‐sex‐ratio chromosome and cytoplasmic incompatibility bacteria (Wolbachia): A comparative study of early embryonic events , 1995, Molecular reproduction and development.

[37]  H. A. Orr,et al.  The population genetics of speciation: the evolution of hybrid incompatibilities. , 1995, Genetics.

[38]  T. Price,et al.  SPECIATION BY REINFORCEMENT OF PREMATING ISOLATION , 1994, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[39]  M. Turelli EVOLUTION OF INCOMPATIBILITY‐INDUCING MICROBES AND THEIR HOSTS , 1994, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[40]  J. Brookfield,et al.  Evidence for a Wolbachia symbiont in Drosophila melanogaster. , 1993, Genetical research.

[41]  H. Robertson,et al.  Interspecific and intraspecific horizontal transfer of Wolbachia in Drosophila. , 1993, Science.

[42]  M. Turelli,et al.  Dynamics of cytoplasmic incompatibility and mtDNA variation in natural Drosophila simulans populations. , 1992, Genetics.

[43]  M. Turelli,et al.  Rapid spread of an inherited incompatibility factor in California Drosophila , 1991, Nature.

[44]  S. O'Neill,et al.  Bidirectional incompatibility between conspecific populations of Drosophila simulans , 1990, Nature.

[45]  J. Werren,et al.  Microorganisms associated with chromosome destruction and reproductive isolation between two insect species , 1990, Nature.

[46]  N. Barton,et al.  Adaptation, speciation and hybrid zones , 1989, Nature.

[47]  N. Sanderson CAN GENE FLOW PREVENT REINFORCEMENT? , 1989, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[48]  H. A. Orr,et al.  PATTERNS OF SPECIATION IN DROSOPHILA , 1989, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[49]  R. Butlin Speciation by reinforcement. , 1987, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[50]  H. Spencer,et al.  A Theoretical Investigation of Speciation by Reinforcement , 1986, The American Naturalist.

[51]  A. Templeton MECHANISMS OF SPECIATION­ A POPULATION GENETIC APPROACH , 1981 .

[52]  J. Felsenstein SKEPTICISM TOWARDS SANTA ROSALIA, OR WHY ARE THERE SO FEW KINDS OF ANIMALS? , 1981, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[53]  A. R. Barr,et al.  New Hypothesis of the Cause of Cytoplasmic Incompatibility in Culex pipiens L. , 1971, Nature.

[54]  G. A. Horridge,et al.  Animal species and evolution. , 1964 .

[55]  Ernst Caspari,et al.  ON THE EVOLUTIONARY IMPORTANCE OF CYTOPLASMIC STERILITY IN MOSQUITOES , 1959 .

[56]  C. Pigott Genetics and the Origin of Species , 1959, Nature.

[57]  H. Laven Speciation by cytoplasmic isolation in the Culex pipiens-complex. , 1959, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[58]  H. Laven CROSSING EXPERIMENTS WITH CULEX STRAINS , 1951 .

[59]  R. Punnett,et al.  The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection , 1930, Nature.