Local immune response against larvae of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus in Bos taurus indicus and Bos taurus taurus cattle.

[1]  C. Gondro,et al.  Tick-susceptible Bos taurus cattle display an increased cellular response at the site of larval Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus attachment, compared with tick-resistant Bos indicus cattle. , 2010, International journal for parasitology.

[2]  Cedric Gondro,et al.  Immunological Profiles of Bos taurus and Bos indicus Cattle Infested with the Cattle Tick, Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus , 2009, Clinical and Vaccine Immunology.

[3]  N. Jonsson,et al.  Gene expression in the skin of Bos taurus and Bos indicus cattle infested with the cattle tick, Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus. , 2008, Veterinary immunology and immunopathology.

[4]  P. Olafson,et al.  Serologically defined Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus larval antigens in BmLF3, a partially pure Sephacryl S-300 fraction of crude larval proteins. , 2008, Veterinary parasitology.

[5]  J. Andersen,et al.  Comparative sialomics between hard and soft ticks: implications for the evolution of blood-feeding behavior. , 2008, Insect biochemistry and molecular biology.

[6]  Y. Belkaid.  Regulatory T cells and infection: a dangerous necessity , 2007, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[7]  H. Vordermeier,et al.  Distribution and Activation of T-lymphocyte Subsets in Tuberculous Bovine Lymph-node Granulomas* , 2007, Veterinary pathology.

[8]  S. Beissert,et al.  Dendritic cells and T cells in the regulation of cutaneous immunity. , 2007, Advances in dermatology.

[9]  J. Hedges,et al.  Comparative gene expression by WC1+ γδ and CD4+ αβ T lymphocytes, which respond to Anaplasma marginale, demonstrates higher expression of chemokines and other myeloid cell‐associated genes by WC1+ γδ T cells , 2006 .

[10]  W. Born,et al.  The function of γδ T cells in innate immunity , 2006 .

[11]  S. Wikel,et al.  Cellular infiltration at skin lesions and draining lymph nodes of sheep infested with adult Hyalomma anatolicum anatolicum ticks , 2005, Parasitology.

[12]  L. Gershwin,et al.  Boophilus microplus: the pattern of bovine immunoglobulin isotype responses to high and low tick infestations. , 2005, Experimental parasitology.

[13]  D. Kemp,et al.  A putative role for eosinophils in tick rejection , 1981, Experientia.

[14]  Adriana T Larregina,et al.  Changing paradigms in cutaneous immunology: adapting with dendritic cells. , 2005, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[15]  C. Turni,et al.  Effect of salivary gland extracts from the tick, Boophilus microplus, on leucocytes from Brahman and Hereford cattle , 2002, Parasite immunology.

[16]  J. Pollock,et al.  The detection of CD2+, CD4+, CD8+, and WC1+ T lymphocytes, B cells and macrophages in fixed and paraffin embedded bovine tissue using a range of antigen recovery and signal amplification techniques. , 1999, Veterinary immunology and immunopathology.

[17]  S. Wikel.  Tick modulation of host immunity: an important factor in pathogen transmission. , 1999, International journal for parasitology.

[18]  D. Werling,et al.  Gammadelta T cells present antigen to CD4+ alphabeta T cells. , 1998, Journal of leukocyte biology.

[19]  L. Dudler,et al.  TCR γδ+ cells are prominent in normal bovine skin and express a diverse repertoire of antigen receptors , 1997, Immunology.

[20]  J. Naessens,et al.  Biochemical analysis of preliminary clusters in the non-lineage panel. , 1996, Veterinary immunology and immunopathology.

[21]  I. Andó,et al.  Monoclonal antibodies detecting components of the bovine immune system in formaldehyde-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue specimens. , 1996, Veterinary immunology and immunopathology.

[22]  P. Willadsen,et al.  Commercialisation of a recombinant vaccine against Boophilus microplus , 1995, Parasitology.

[23]  A. Wardlaw,et al.  Eosinophils: biology and role in disease. , 1995, Advances in immunology.

[24]  M. Mbow,et al.  Infiltration of CD4+ CD8+ T cells, and expression of ICAM-1, Ia antigens, IL-1 alpha and TNF-alpha in the skin lesion of BALB/c mice undergoing repeated infestations with nymphal Ixodes ricinus ticks. , 1994, Immunology.

[25]  M. Hamilton,et al.  Identification of a monoclonal antibody reactive with the bovine orthologue of CD3 (BoCD3). , 1993, Veterinary immunology and immunopathology.

[26]  J. S. Azevedo,et al.  Inhibition and recovery of tick functions in cattle repeatedly infested with Boophilus microplus. , 1993, The Journal of parasitology.

[27]  P M Guyre,et al.  Induction of MHC class II on human polymorphonuclear neutrophils by granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor, IFN-gamma, and IL-3. , 1993, Journal of immunology.

[28]  Margaret Jones,et al.  Detection of T and B cells in many animal species using cross-reactive anti-peptide antibodies. , 1993, Journal of immunology.

[29]  K. Y. Choi,et al.  Differential expression of bovine MHC class II antigens identified by monoclonal antibodies , 1993, Journal of leukocyte biology.

[30]  P. Valent,et al.  Cell surface structures on human basophils and mast cells: biochemical and functional characterization. , 1992, Advances in immunology.

[31]  Y. Rechav,et al.  Relative resistance of six cattle breeds to the tick Boophilus decoloratus in South Africa. , 1991, The Onderstepoort journal of veterinary research.

[32]  M. Hadam,et al.  Bovine CD4 (BoCD4) , 1991 .

[33]  W. Morrison,et al.  Individual antigens of cattle. Differentiation antigens expressed predominantly on CD4- CD8- T lymphocytes (WC1, WC2). , 1991, Veterinary immunology and immunopathology.

[34]  N. Stewart,et al.  Biological comparisons between a laboratory-maintained and a recently isolated field strain of Boophilus microplus. , 1982, The Journal of parasitology.

[35]  A. Bourne,et al.  Arteriovenous anastomoses in the dermal vasculature of the skin of Bos taurus cattle, and their relationship with resistance to the tick, Boophilus microplus. , 1981, Australian journal of biological sciences.

[36]  P. Willadsen,et al.  Immunity to ticks. , 1980, Advances in parasitology.

[37]  B. Wagland.  Host resistance to cattle tick (Boophilus microplus) in Brahman (Bos indicus) cattle. IV.* Ages of ticks rejected , 1979 .

[38]  D. Kemp,et al.  Boophilus microplus: rejection of larvae from British breed cattle , 1978, Parasitology.

[39]  J. Roberts,et al.  Responses of cattle to allergens from Boophilus microplus. , 1978, International journal for parasitology.

[40]  R. Wharton,et al.  Resistance to Boophilus microplus (Canestrini) in different breeds of cattle , 1978 .

[41]  B. Wagland.  Host resistance to cattle tick (Boophilus microplus) in Brahman (Bos indicus) cattle. II.* The dynamics of resistance in previously unexposed and exposed cattle , 1978 .

[42]  J. Roberts,et al.  Boophilus microplus: cellular responses to larval attachment and their relationship to host resistance. , 1976, Australian journal of biological sciences.

[43]  J. G. Rowell,et al.  Analysing data with repeated observations on each experimental unit , 1976, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[44]  Roberts Ja,et al.  Boophilus microplus: passive transfer of resistance in cattle. , 1976 .

[45]  G. Seifert.  Variations between and within breeds of cattle in resistance to field infestations of the cattle tick (Boophilus microplus). , 1971 .

[46]  D. Moorhouse,et al.  Neutrophils: Their Role in the Formation of a Tick Feeding Lesion , 1970, Science.

[47]  G. Bennett.  Boophilus microplus (acarina: ixodidae): experimental infestations on cattle restrained from grooming. , 1969, Experimental parasitology.

[48]  R. Wharton,et al.  A comparison of cattle tick control by pasture spelling, planned dipping, and tick-resistant cattle , 1969 .

[49]  J. Roberts.  Acquisition by the host of resistance to the cattle tick, Boophilus microplus (Canestrini). , 1968 .

[50]  Roberts Ja.  Resistance of cattle to the tick boophilus microplus (canestrini). II. Stages of the life cycle of the parasite against which resistance is manifest. , 1968 .

[51]  D. Moorhouse,et al.  The feeding processes of the cattle tick Boophilus microplus (Canestrini) , 1968, Parasitology.

[52]  D. Moorhouse,et al.  The feeding processes of the cattle-tick Boophilus microplus (Canestrini): A study in host-parasite relations , 1966, Parasitology.

[53]  R. Riek.  FACTORS INFLUENCING THE SUSCEPTIBILITY OF CATTLE TO TICK INFESTATION , 1956 .