The Landscape Ecology of Rivers: from Patch-Based to Spatial Network Analyses

We synthesize recent methodological and conceptual advances in the field of riverscape ecology, emphasizing areas of synergy with current research in landscape ecology. Recent advances in riverscape ecology highlight the need for spatially explicit examinations of how network structure influences ecological pattern and process, instead of the simple linear (upstream-downstream) view. Developments in GIS, remote sensing, and computer technologies already offer powerful tools for the application of patch- and gradient-based models for characterizing abiotic and biotic heterogeneity across a range of spatial and temporal scales. Along with graph-based analyses and spatial statistical stream network models (i.e., geostatistical modelling), these approaches offer improved capabilities for quantifying spatial and temporal heterogeneity and connectivity relationships, thereby allowing for rigorous and high-resolution analyses of pattern, process, and scale relationships. Spatially explicit network approaches are able to quantify and predict biogeochemical, hydromorphological, and ecological patterns and processes more precisely than models based on longitudinal or lateral riverine gradients alone. Currently, local habitat characteristics appear to be more important than spatial effects in determining population and community dynamics, but this conclusion may change with direct quantification of the movement of materials, energy, and organisms along channels and across ecosystem boundaries—a key to improving riverscape ecology. Coupling spatially explicit riverscape models with optimization approaches will improve land protection and water management efforts, and help to resolve the land sharing vs. land sparing debate.

[1]  F. Comiti,et al.  Characterising physical habitats and fluvial hydromorphology: A new system for the survey and classification of river geomorphic units , 2017 .

[2]  M. McPeek,et al.  Is dispersal neutral? , 2014, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[3]  Thomas Blaschke,et al.  Understanding and quantifying landscape structure – A review on relevant process characteristics, data models and landscape metrics , 2015 .

[4]  C. Revenga,et al.  Fragmentation and Flow Regulation of the World's Large River Systems , 2005, Science.

[5]  J. Olden,et al.  Homogenization of regional river dynamics by dams and global biodiversity implications , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  Jianguo Wu,et al.  Key concepts and research topics in landscape ecology revisited: 30 years after the Allerton Park workshop , 2012, Landscape Ecology.

[7]  Satoru Ono,et al.  Metapopulation stability in branching river networks , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  R. Abell,et al.  Unlocking the potential of protected areas for freshwaters , 2007 .

[9]  J. Lundholm,et al.  Variation partitioning as a tool to distinguish between niche and neutral processes , 2010 .

[10]  M. Loreau,et al.  Biodiversity as spatial insurance in heterogeneous landscapes , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  Philip Leitner,et al.  Multiscale connectivity and graph theory highlight critical areas for conservation under climate change. , 2016, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[12]  N. Poff,et al.  Spatiotemporal controls of simulated metacommunity dynamics in dendritic networks , 2011, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[13]  M. Scown,et al.  Characterization of River Networks: A GIS Approach and Its Applications , 2018, Journal of the American Water Resources Association.

[14]  Kevin McGarigal,et al.  Surface metrics: an alternative to patch metrics for the quantification of landscape structure , 2009, Landscape Ecology.

[15]  Andrew Fall,et al.  Patch-based graphs of landscape connectivity: A guide to construction, analysis and application for conservation , 2011 .

[16]  L. Cattarino,et al.  Catchment zoning to enhance co-benefits and minimize trade-offs between ecosystem services and freshwater biodiversity conservation , 2018 .

[17]  S. Lek,et al.  Climate change hastens the turnover of stream fish assemblages , 2008 .

[18]  J. Olden,et al.  The role of dispersal in river network metacommunities: Patterns, processes, and pathways , 2018 .

[19]  T. Erős,et al.  Does isolation influence the relative role of environmental and dispersal‐related processes in stream networks? An empirical test of the network position hypothesis using multiple taxa , 2018 .

[20]  M. Palmer,et al.  Riverine macrosystems ecology: sensitivity, resistance, and resilience of whole river basins with human alterations , 2014 .

[21]  Maria Teresa Ferreira,et al.  Prioritizing barrier removal to improve functional connectivity of rivers , 2014 .

[22]  S. Schmutz,et al.  Spatio‐temporal habitat dynamics in a changing Danube River landscape 1812—2006 , 2011 .

[23]  M. Marchamalo,et al.  Toward floodplain rejuvenation in the middle Ebro River (Spain): From history to action , 2018, Geomorphology.

[24]  Paul J. A. Withers,et al.  Optimizing land use for the delivery of catchment ecosystem services , 2016 .

[25]  R. Grabowski,et al.  The use of remote sensing to characterise hydromorphological properties of European rivers , 2015, Aquatic Sciences.

[26]  Marie-Josée Fortin,et al.  Spatial Graphs: Principles and Applications for Habitat Connectivity , 2007, Ecosystems.

[27]  WINSOR H. LOWE,et al.  Landscape-Scale Spatial Population Dynamics in Human-Impacted Stream Systems , 2002, Environmental management.

[28]  Jianhui Huang,et al.  Three-Gorges Dam--Experiment in Habitat Fragmentation? , 2003, Science.

[29]  F. Altermatt,et al.  Meta-Ecosystems 2.0: Rooting the Theory into the Field. , 2018, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[30]  K. Fausch,et al.  Landscapes to Riverscapes: Bridging the Gap between Research and Conservation of Stream Fishes , 2002 .

[31]  Milos Rusnák,et al.  Multitemporal assessment of coarse sediment connectivity along a braided‐wandering river , 2018 .

[32]  K. Gido,et al.  Fragmentation and dewatering transform Great Plains stream fish communities , 2015 .

[33]  H. Wehrden,et al.  Land Sparing Versus Land Sharing: Moving Forward , 2014 .

[34]  K. Cook An evaluation of the effectiveness of low-cost UAVs and structure from motion for geomorphic change detection , 2017 .

[35]  G. Likens,et al.  Linkages between Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecosystems , 1974 .

[36]  C. Wolter,et al.  Where Are All the Fish: Potential of Biogeographical Maps to Project Current and Future Distribution Patterns of Freshwater Species , 2012, PloS one.

[37]  Robert A. Francis,et al.  Perspectives on biogeomorphology, ecosystem engineering and self-organisation in island-braided fluvial ecosystems , 2009, Aquatic Sciences.

[38]  Daniel R. Miller,et al.  The Network Dynamics Hypothesis: How Channel Networks Structure Riverine Habitats , 2004 .

[39]  Sebastian Birk,et al.  LaRiMo - A simple and efficient GIS-based approach for large-scale morphological assessment of large European rivers. , 2018, Science of the Total Environment.

[40]  Mark Broich,et al.  Surface-water dynamics and land use influence landscape connectivity across a major dryland region. , 2017, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[41]  E. Grant,et al.  Unifying research on the fragmentation of terrestrial and aquatic habitats: patches, connectivity and the matrix in riverscapes , 2015 .

[42]  S. Jennings,et al.  Human effects on ecological connectivity in aquatic ecosystems: Integrating scientific approaches to support management and mitigation. , 2015, The Science of the total environment.

[43]  Brian E. Robinson,et al.  Using ecosystem service trade‐offs to inform water conservation policies and management practices , 2016 .

[44]  David A Siegel,et al.  Patch definition in metapopulation analysis: a graph theory approach to solve the mega-patch problem. , 2014, Ecology.

[45]  J. Wiens Riverine landscapes: taking landscape ecology into the water , 2002 .

[46]  M. Turner,et al.  LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY : The Effect of Pattern on Process 1 , 2002 .

[47]  Darren L. Ficklin,et al.  The Potential Impacts of Climate Change on Biodiversity in Flowing Freshwater Systems , 2017 .

[48]  Benjamin Gilbert,et al.  Variation partitioning in ecological communities: Do the numbers add up? , 2010 .

[49]  M. Delong,et al.  The riverine ecosystem synthesis: biocomplexity in river networks across space and time , 2006 .

[50]  Miloš Rusnák,et al.  Template for high-resolution river landscape mapping using UAV technology , 2018 .

[51]  Florian Altermatt,et al.  Diversity in riverine metacommunities: a network perspective , 2013, Aquatic Ecology.

[52]  T. Erős,et al.  Habitat mapping of riverine fish by means of hydromorphological tools , 2018, Ecohydrology.

[53]  Marie-Josée Fortin,et al.  From Graphs to Spatial Graphs , 2010 .

[54]  C. Swan,et al.  Dendritic network structure constrains metacommunity properties in riverine ecosystems. , 2010, The Journal of animal ecology.

[55]  Andrew Balmford,et al.  Farming and the Fate of Wild Nature , 2005, Science.

[56]  P. McIntyre,et al.  Aquatic Ecosystem Impacts of Land Sharing Versus Sparing: Nutrient Loading to Southeast Asian Rivers , 2017, Ecosystems.

[57]  T. Okruszko,et al.  A multi-scale hierarchical framework for developing understanding of river behaviour to support river management , 2015, Aquatic Sciences.

[58]  D. Lindenmayer,et al.  Landscape modification and habitat fragmentation: a synthesis , 2007 .

[59]  Dénes Schmera,et al.  Network thinking in riverscape conservation – A graph-based approach , 2011 .

[60]  J. Secondi,et al.  Network analysis for species management in rivers networks: Application to the Loire River , 2017 .

[61]  Jane S. Fencl,et al.  Identifying keystone habitats with a mosaic approach can improve biodiversity conservation in disturbed ecosystems , 2018, Global change biology.

[62]  Abel Solera,et al.  Integrating ecosystem services in river basin management plans , 2016 .

[63]  G. Likens,et al.  Moving Headwater Streams to the Head of the Class , 2005 .

[64]  T. Pavelsky,et al.  Global extent of rivers and streams , 2018, Science.

[65]  J. Heino,et al.  Metacommunity organisation, spatial extent and dispersal in aquatic systems: patterns, processes and prospects , 2015 .

[66]  Mark Hebblewhite,et al.  Gravel-bed river floodplains are the ecological nexus of glaciated mountain landscapes , 2016, Science Advances.

[67]  S. Levin,et al.  Trading-off fish biodiversity, food security, and hydropower in the Mekong River Basin , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[68]  Casey Brown,et al.  Sustainable water management under future uncertainty with eco-engineering decision scaling , 2016 .

[69]  Paulo Branco,et al.  Prioritizing restoration of structural connectivity in rivers: a graph based approach , 2013, Landscape Ecology.

[70]  Amy E. Frazier,et al.  Landscape Metrics: Past Progress and Future Directions , 2017, Current Landscape Ecology Reports.

[71]  Gene E Likens,et al.  Network analysis reveals multiscale controls on streamwater chemistry , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[72]  Marie-Josée Fortin,et al.  Modelling dendritic ecological networks in space: an integrated network perspective. , 2013, Ecology letters.

[73]  L. Fahrig Effects of Habitat Fragmentation on Biodiversity , 2003 .

[74]  G. Minshall,et al.  The River Continuum Concept , 1980 .

[75]  L. Comte,et al.  Do stream fish track climate change? Assessing distribution shifts in recent decades , 2013 .

[76]  T. Erős,et al.  Effect of field sampling design on variation partitioning in a dendritic stream network , 2016 .

[77]  T. Erős,et al.  The scales of variability of stream fish assemblages at tributary confluences , 2016, Aquatic Sciences.

[78]  W. Fagan,et al.  Living in the branches: population dynamics and ecological processes in dendritic networks. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[79]  Klement Tockner,et al.  Understanding natural patterns and processes in river corridors as the basis for effective river restoration , 2001 .

[80]  Dirk J. Roux,et al.  Expanding protected areas beyond their terrestrial comfort zone: Identifying spatial options for river conservation , 2009 .

[81]  Dénes Schmera,et al.  Characterizing connectivity relationships in freshwaters using patch-based graphs , 2012, Landscape Ecology.

[82]  A. Casper,et al.  Linking Ecosystem Services, Rehabilitation, and River Hydrogeomorphology , 2010 .

[83]  Pedro Beja,et al.  Geostatistical distribution modelling of two invasive crayfish across dendritic stream networks , 2017, Biological Invasions.

[84]  C. Wolter,et al.  Synergistic and antagonistic interactions of future land use and climate change on river fish assemblages , 2016, Global change biology.

[85]  M. Scown,et al.  Measuring floodplain spatial patterns using continuous surface metrics at multiple scales , 2015 .

[86]  Jay M. Ver Hoef,et al.  Applications of spatial statistical network models to stream data , 2014 .

[87]  W. Fagan CONNECTIVITY, FRAGMENTATION, AND EXTINCTION RISK IN DENDRITIC METAPOPULATIONS , 2002 .

[88]  Carlos Montes,et al.  Incorporating the Social–Ecological Approach in Protected Areas in the Anthropocene , 2014 .

[89]  G. Poole Fluvial landscape ecology: addressing uniqueness within the river discontinuum , 2002 .

[90]  J. Tonkin,et al.  Context dependency in biodiversity patterns of central German stream metacommunities , 2016 .

[91]  Jacques Labonne,et al.  Linking dendritic network structures to population demogenetics: The downside of connectivity , 2008 .

[92]  K. Neufeld,et al.  Incorporating asymmetric movement costs into measures of habitat connectivity to assess impacts of hydrologic alteration to stream fishes , 2018 .

[93]  S. Anzalone,et al.  Setting spatial conservation priorities despite incomplete data for characterizing metapopulations. , 2016, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[94]  J. Allan Landscapes and Riverscapes: The Influence of Land Use on Stream Ecosystems , 2004 .

[95]  T. Erős Scaling fish metacommunities in stream networks: Synthesis and future research avenues , 2017 .

[96]  Mark Broich,et al.  Evaluating static and dynamic landscape connectivity modelling using a 25-year remote sensing time series , 2018, Landscape Ecology.

[97]  S. Januchowski‐Hartley,et al.  A comprehensive examination of the network position hypothesis across multiple river metacommunities , 2018, Ecography.

[98]  Jesse R. O’Hanley,et al.  A unified model for optimizing riverscape conservation , 2018 .

[99]  J. Thorp Metamorphosis in river ecology: from reaches to macrosystems , 2014 .

[100]  D. Angeler,et al.  Metacommunity structure in a small boreal stream network. , 2013, The Journal of animal ecology.

[101]  W. Lowe LINKING DISPERSAL TO LOCAL POPULATION DYNAMICS: A CASE STUDY USING A HEADWATER SALAMANDER SYSTEM , 2003 .

[102]  Colin R. Townsend,et al.  The Patch Dynamics Concept of Stream Community Ecology , 1989, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.