A Method for Minimizing the Impact of Distributional Assumptions in Econometric Models for Duration Data

Conventional analyses of single spell duration models control for unobservables using a random effect estimator with the distribution of unobservables selected by ad hoc criteria. Both theoretical and empirical examples indicate that estimates of structural parameters obtained from conventional procedures are very sensitive to the choice of mixing distribution. Conventional procedures overparameterize duration models. We develop a consistent nonparametric maximum likelihood estimator for the distribution of unobservables and a computational strategy for implementing it. For a sample of unemployed workers our estimator produces estimates in concordance with standard search theory while conventional estimators do not. ECONOMIC THEORIES of search unemployment (Lippman and McCall [34]; Flinn and Heckman [14]), job turnover (Jovanovic [25]), mortality (Harris [17]), labor supply (Heckman and Willis [23]) and marital instability (Becker [3]) produce structural distributions for durations of occupancy of states. These theories generate qualitative predictions about the effects of changes in parameters on these structural distributions, and occasionally predict their functional forms.2 In order to test economic theories about durations and recover structural parameters, it is necessary to account for population variation in observed and unobserved variables unless it is assumed a priori that individuals are homogeneous.3 In every microeconomic study in which the hypothesis of heterogeneity is subject to test, it is not rejected. Temporally persistent unobserved components are an empirically important fact of life in microeconomic data (Heckman [19]). Since the appearance of papers by Silcock [39] and Blumen, Kogan, and McCarthy [5], social scientists have been aware that failure to adequately control for population heterogeneity can produce severe bias in structural estimates of duration models. Serious empirical analysts attempt to control for these unob

[1]  D. Widder,et al.  The Laplace Transform , 1943, The Mathematical Gazette.

[2]  William Feller,et al.  An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications , 1951 .

[3]  J. Kiefer,et al.  CONSISTENCY OF THE MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATOR IN THE PRESENCE OF INFINITELY MANY INCIDENTAL PARAMETERS , 1956 .

[4]  F. F. Stephan,et al.  The Industrial Mobility of Labor as a Probability Process by I. Blumen, M. Kogan, Ph. J. McCarthy. Cornell Studies in Industrial and Labor Relations, Vol. VI. Ithaca, Cornell University, 1955, XII p. 163 p., $ 2.00. , 1956, Bulletin de l'Institut de recherches économiques et sociales.

[5]  P. A. P. Moran,et al.  An introduction to probability theory , 1968 .

[6]  Erling B. Andersen,et al.  Conditional Inference and Models for Measuring , 1974 .

[7]  S. Lippman,et al.  THE ECONOMICS OF JOB SEARCH: A SURVEY* , 1976 .

[8]  L. Simar.  Maximum Likelihood Estimation of a Compound Poisson Process , 1976 .

[9]  James J. Heckman,et al.  A Beta-logistic Model for the Analysis of Sequential Labor Force Participation by Married Women , 1975, Journal of Political Economy.

[10]  Lokenath Debnath,et al.  Introduction to the Theory and Application of the Laplace Transformation , 1974, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[11]  D. Rubin,et al.  Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM - algorithm plus discussions on the paper , 1977 .

[12]  N. Laird.  Nonparametric Maximum Likelihood Estimation of a Mixing Distribution , 1978 .

[13]  L. Ahlfors.  Complex Analysis , 1979 .

[14]  Stephen Nickell,et al.  Estimating the Probability of Leaving Unemployment , 1979 .

[15]  J. Heckman.  Sample selection bias as a specification error , 1979 .

[16]  Boyan Jovanovic.  Job Matching and the Theory of Turnover , 1979, Journal of Political Economy.

[17]  Nicholas M. Kiefer,et al.  An Empirical Job-Search Model, with a Test of the Constant Reservation-Wage Hypothesis , 1979, Journal of Political Economy.

[18]  Bruce G. Lindsay,et al.  Properties of the Maximum Likelihood Estimator of a Mixing Distribution , 1981 .

[19]  Chris Elbers,et al.  True and Spurious Duration Dependence: The Identifiability of the Proportional Hazard Model , 1982 .

[20]  J. Heckman,et al.  New Methods for Analyzing Structural Models of Labor Force Dynamics , 1982 .

[21]  New York Dover,et al.  ON THE CONVERGENCE PROPERTIES OF THE EM ALGORITHM , 1983 .

[22]  J. Heckman,et al.  The Identifiability of the Proportional Hazard Model , 1984 .

[23]  Gary Chamberlain,et al.  Longitudinal Analysis of Labor Market Data: Heterogeneity, omitted variable bias, and duration dependence , 1985 .