Substrate modulus directs neural stem cell behavior.

Although biochemical signals that modulate stem cell self-renewal and differentiation were extensively studied, only recently were the mechanical properties of a stem cell's microenvironment shown to regulate its behavior. It would be desirable to have independent control over biochemical and mechanical cues, to analyze their relative and combined effects on stem-cell function. We developed a synthetic, interfacial hydrogel culture system, termed variable moduli interpenetrating polymer networks (vmIPNs), to assess the effects of soluble signals, adhesion ligand presentation, and material moduli from 10-10,000 Pa on adult neural stem-cell (aNSC) behavior. The aNSCs proliferated when cultured in serum-free growth media on peptide-modified vmIPNs with moduli of >/=100 Pa. In serum-free neuronal differentiation media, a peak level of the neuronal marker, beta-tubulin III, was observed on vmIPNs of 500 Pa, near the physiological stiffness of brain tissue. Furthermore, under mixed differentiation conditions with serum, softer gels ( approximately 100-500 Pa) greatly favored neurons, whereas harder gels ( approximately 1,000-10,000 Pa) promoted glial cultures. In contrast, cell spreading, self-renewal, and differentiation were inhibited on substrata with moduli of approximately 10 Pa. This work demonstrates that the mechanical and biochemical properties of an aNSC microenvironment can be tuned to regulate the self-renewal and differentiation of aNSCs.

[1]  Samia J. Khoury,et al.  Directed migration of neural stem cells to sites of CNS injury by the stromal cell-derived factor 1α/CXC chemokine receptor 4 pathway , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  Adam J. Engler,et al.  Myotubes differentiate optimally on substrates with tissue-like stiffness , 2004, The Journal of cell biology.

[3]  J. Lagarde,et al.  In vivo model of the mechanical properties of the human skin under suction , 2000, Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging.

[4]  Yoav Soen,et al.  Exploring the regulation of human neural precursor cell differentiation using arrays of signaling microenvironments , 2006, Molecular systems biology.

[5]  Development of quantitative PCR methods to analyse neural progenitor cell culture state , 2006, Biotechnology and applied biochemistry.

[6]  Barclay Morrison,et al.  Mechanical heterogeneity of the rat hippocampus measured by atomic force microscope indentation. , 2007, Journal of neurotrauma.

[7]  J. Bamburg,et al.  Cdc42 participates in the regulation of ADF/cofilin and retinal growth cone filopodia by brain derived neurotrophic factor. , 2006, Journal of neurobiology.

[8]  J. Gunn,et al.  Adhesive and mechanical properties of hydrogels influence neurite extension. , 2005, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[9]  F. Gage,et al.  In vivo fate analysis reveals the multipotent and self-renewal capacities of Sox2+ neural stem cells in the adult hippocampus. , 2007, Cell stem cell.

[10]  David F Meaney,et al.  Matrices with compliance comparable to that of brain tissue select neuronal over glial growth in mixed cortical cultures. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[11]  Fred H. Gage,et al.  A role for adult TLX-positive neural stem cells in learning and behaviour , 2008, Nature.

[12]  Anne E Carpenter,et al.  CellProfiler: free, versatile software for automated biological image analysis. , 2007, BioTechniques.

[13]  F. Gage,et al.  Mammalian neural stem cells. , 2000, Science.

[14]  Shinya Sasaki,et al.  Elastic modulus of polystyrene film from near surface to bulk measured by nanoindentation using atomic force microscopy , 2006 .

[15]  Krista L. Niece,et al.  Selective Differentiation of Neural Progenitor Cells by High-Epitope Density Nanofibers , 2004, Science.

[16]  F. Grinnell,et al.  Extracellular matrix organization modulates fibroblast growth and growth factor responsiveness. , 1989, Experimental cell research.

[17]  K. Healy,et al.  Analysis of interpenetrating polymer networks via quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation monitoring. , 2005, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[18]  P. Janmey,et al.  Tissue Cells Feel and Respond to the Stiffness of Their Substrate , 2005, Science.

[19]  D. Castner,et al.  Modulus-dependent macrophage adhesion and behavior , 2008, Journal of biomaterials science. Polymer edition.

[20]  T. Naoe,et al.  Integrin Activation and Matrix Binding Mediate Cellular Responses to Mechanical Stretch* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[21]  Christopher S. Chen,et al.  Cell shape, cytoskeletal tension, and RhoA regulate stem cell lineage commitment. , 2004, Developmental cell.

[22]  F. Gage,et al.  FGF-2-Responsive Neuronal Progenitors Reside in Proliferative and Quiescent Regions of the Adult Rodent Brain , 1995, Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience.

[23]  Jochen Guck,et al.  Viscoelastic properties of individual glial cells and neurons in the CNS , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  P. Janmey,et al.  Effects of substrate stiffness on cell morphology, cytoskeletal structure, and adhesion. , 2005, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[25]  Rebecca Kuntz Willits,et al.  Effect of collagen gel stiffness on neurite extension , 2004, Journal of biomaterials science. Polymer edition.

[26]  Lisa A Flanagan,et al.  Neurite branching on deformable substrates , 2002, Neuroreport.

[27]  J. Bard,et al.  The behavior of fibroblasts from the developing avian cornea. Morphology and movement in situ and in vitro , 1975, The Journal of cell biology.

[28]  Radhika Desai,et al.  ROCK-generated contractility regulates breast epithelial cell differentiation in response to the physical properties of a three-dimensional collagen matrix , 2003, The Journal of cell biology.

[29]  E. Hay Interaction of embryonic surface and cytoskeleton with extracellular matrix. , 1982, The American journal of anatomy.

[30]  M. Sheetz,et al.  RPTPα is required for rigidity-dependent inhibition of extension and differentiation of hippocampal neurons , 2007, Journal of Cell Science.

[31]  S. Sen,et al.  Matrix Elasticity Directs Stem Cell Lineage Specification , 2006, Cell.

[32]  Krishanu Saha,et al.  Biomimetic interfacial interpenetrating polymer networks control neural stem cell behavior. , 2007, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[33]  Joyce Y Wong,et al.  Neurite outgrowth and branching of PC12 cells on very soft substrates sharply decreases below a threshold of substrate rigidity , 2007, Journal of neural engineering.

[34]  David V Schaffer,et al.  PI3K/Akt and CREB regulate adult neural hippocampal progenitor proliferation and differentiation , 2007, Developmental neurobiology.

[35]  Y. Wang,et al.  Cell locomotion and focal adhesions are regulated by substrate flexibility. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  E. Hay Interaction of embryonic cell surface and cytoskeleton with extracellular matrix , 1982 .

[37]  Fred H. Gage,et al.  Sonic hedgehog regulates adult neural progenitor proliferation in vitro and in vivo , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[38]  F. Gage,et al.  Retinoic acid and neurotrophins collaborate to regulate neurogenesis in adult-derived neural stem cell cultures. , 1999, Journal of neurobiology.

[39]  A. Gefen,et al.  Are in vivo and in situ brain tissues mechanically similar? , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[40]  J. Bearinger,et al.  Biomolecular modification of p(AAm-co-EG/AA) IPNs supports osteoblast adhesion and phenotypic expression. , 1998, Journal of biomaterials science. Polymer edition.

[41]  M. Dembo,et al.  Cell movement is guided by the rigidity of the substrate. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[42]  Krishanu Saha,et al.  Designing synthetic materials to control stem cell phenotype. , 2007, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[43]  D. Castner,et al.  Development and characterization of a high-throughput system for assessing cell-surface receptor-ligand engagement. , 2005, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[44]  F. Valtorta,et al.  Normal levels of Rac1 are important for dendritic but not axonal development in hippocampal neurons , 2007, Biology of the cell.

[45]  D. Schaffer,et al.  Neural stem cell engineering: directed differentiation of adult and embryonic stem cells into neurons. , 2008, Frontiers in bioscience : a journal and virtual library.

[46]  P. A. Dimilla,et al.  Spreading and motility of human glioblastoma cells on sheets of silicone rubber depend on substratum compliance , 2000, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[47]  K. Healy,et al.  The effect of ligand type and density on osteoblast adhesion, proliferation, and matrix mineralization. , 2005, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[48]  P. Rakić Limits of neurogenesis in primates. , 1985, Science.

[49]  J. Tomasek,et al.  Mechanical properties of the extracellular matrix influence fibronectin fibril assembly in vitro. , 1995, Experimental cell research.