Composite veneers: The direct-indirect technique revisited.

OBJECTIVE This article provides an update on the direct-indirect composite veneer technique. CLINICAL CONSIDERATIONS Composite veneers have long been used as a conservative and esthetic treatment option for anterior teeth. While they are generally performed using a direct technique, there has been renewed interest in the direct-indirect composite veneer technique because of its advantages and broad indications for restoration of tooth color and morphology. In the direct-indirect composite veneer technique, the selected composites are initially applied on the tooth using a layering approach, without any bonding agent, sculpted to a primary anatomic form with slight excess, and light-cured. The partially polymerized veneer is then removed from the tooth, heat-tempered, and finished to final anatomy and processed extra-orally before being luted. Advantages of this technique include enhanced physical and mechanical properties afforded by the tempering process, unrivaled marginal adaptation, enhanced finishing and polishing, and the ability to try-in the veneer before luting, enabling a shade verification and modulation process that is not possible with the direct technique. The direct-indirect approach also affords enhanced gingival health and patient comfort. CONCLUSION This article reviews the direct-indirect composite veneer technique, and outlines critical steps and tips for clinical success. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE The direct-indirect technique for composite veneers combines advantages of the direct composite placement technique with those of the indirect veneer technique, including operator control, single-visit fabrication and delivery, increased material properties, and excellent esthetics.

[1]  C. Gonzaga,et al.  Effect of Tribochemical Coating on Composite Repair Strength. , 2020, Operative dentistry.

[2]  N. Fahl Direct-Indirect Class V Restorations: A Novel Approach for Treating Noncarious Cervical Lesions. , 2015, Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.].

[3]  M. Friedman Commentary. Survival rates for porcelain laminate veneers with special reference to the effect of preparation in dentin: a literature review. , 2012, Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.].

[4]  F J Trevor Burke,et al.  Survival rates for porcelain laminate veneers with special reference to the effect of preparation in dentin: a literature review. , 2012, Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.].

[5]  J. Ferracane,et al.  Wear and Marginal Breakdown of Composites with Various Degrees of Cure , 1997, Journal of dental research.

[6]  R. Wassell,et al.  Wear rates of regular and tempered composites. , 1997, Journal of dentistry.

[7]  R. Spreafico,et al.  Adhesive metal-free restorations : current concepts for the esthetic treatment of posterior teeth /by Didier Dietschi, Roberto Spreafico , 1997 .

[8]  N. Fahl Júnior The direct/indirect composite resin veneers: a case report. , 1996, Practical periodontics and aesthetic dentistry : PPAD.

[9]  N. Birnbaum Heat-tempered composite resin laminate veneers. , 1994, Current opinion in cosmetic dentistry.

[10]  D. Covey,et al.  Mechanical properties of heat-treated composite resin restorative materials. , 1992, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[11]  J L Ferracane,et al.  Post-cure heat treatments for composites: properties and fractography. , 1992, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[12]  N. Birnbaum Direct oven-tempered hybrid composite-resin laminate veneers. , 1992, Practical periodontics and aesthetic dentistry : PPAD.

[13]  D. Covey Composite resin inlays. , 1992, Virginia dental journal.