An Empirical Investigation into Factors Relating to the Adoption of Executive Information Systems: An Analysis of EIS for Collaboration and Decision Support*

This study focuses on the organizational adoption of Executive Information Systems (EIS). A distinction is made between two related, complementary EIS capabilities—EIS for collaboration support (EISc) and EIS for decision support (EISd). EISc is relatively standardized and replicable, while EISd has to be developed in situ given the specific characteristics of the user and task. The adoption process is conceptualized as an initial transition from a state of nonadoption to adoption (adoption status) and subsequent internal propagation of the technology (adoption level). Data collected from a national survey are used to test hypotheses between identified contextual variables and the adoption status and adoption level of EISc and EISd. Adopters and nonadopters of both EISc and EISd do not differ in their organization size, suggesting that the traditional paradigm of “EIS as a technology for large firms” is no longer true. Environmental uncertainty is found to promote the transition from a state of nonadoption to adoption of both EISc and EISd while continuing to catalyze the internal propagation of EISd. While no differences are observed in IS department size between adopters and nonadopters of EISc, our results suggest that larger IS departments provide the resource base to explore the less standardized of the two capabilities, EISd. IS support is also found to be critical for the subsequent internal propagation of EISd. Furthermore, the adoption level of both EISc and EISd are found to be promoted by top management support. Implications of these results are discussed for the organizational adoption of EIS.

[1]  David Stewart,et al.  The Application and Misapplication of Factor Analysis in Marketing Research , 1981 .

[2]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Validating Instruments in MIS Research , 1989, MIS Q..

[3]  John H. Grant,et al.  Construct Measurement in Organizational Strategy Research: A Critique and Proposal , 1986 .

[4]  V. Grover An Empirically Derived Model for the Adoption of Customer‐based Interorganizational Systems* , 1993 .

[5]  P. Ein-Dor,et al.  Organizational Context and the Success of Management Information Systems , 1978 .

[6]  E. Burton Swanson,et al.  Information Centers as Organizational Innovation: Exploring the Correlates of Implementation Success , 1992, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[7]  F. Damanpour,et al.  Organizational innovation and performance: The problem of "organizational lag." , 1984 .

[8]  Joyce J. Elam,et al.  Executive Information Systems: Their Impact on Executive Decision Making , 1994, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[9]  Malcolm Munro,et al.  Information Technology Assessment and Adoption: A Field Study , 1985, MIS Q..

[10]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  The Problem of Statistical Power in MIS Research , 1989, MIS Q..

[11]  Vijay Sethi,et al.  Construct Measurement in Information Systems Research: An Illustration in Strategic Systems , 1991 .

[12]  Hugh J. Watson,et al.  Assessing the value of conoco's EIS , 1993 .

[13]  P. Attewell Technology Diffusion and Organizational Learning: The Case of Business Computing , 1992 .

[14]  R. Zmud Diffusion of Modern Software Practices: Influence of Centralization and Formalization , 1982 .

[15]  A. Meyer,et al.  Organizational Assimilation of Innovations: A Multi-Level Contextual Analysis , 1988 .

[16]  Hugh J. Watson,et al.  SIM Competition Paper: The Management Information and Decisin Support (MIDS) System at Lockheed-Georgia , 1987, MIS Q..

[17]  James C. Wetherbe Executive Information Requirements: Getting It Right , 1991, MIS Q..

[18]  Efraim Turban,et al.  Distributed intelligent executive information systems , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..

[19]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Development practices for executive information systems: findings of a field study , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..

[20]  C. Lawrence Meador,et al.  Setting Priorities for DSS Development , 1984, MIS Q..

[21]  Arun Rai,et al.  Can executive information systems reinforce biases , 1994 .

[22]  Arun Rai,et al.  External information source and channel effectiveness and the diffusion of CASE innovations: an empirical study , 1995 .

[23]  James M. Utterback,et al.  Innovation in Industry and the Diffusion of Technology , 1974, Science.

[24]  Ahmet Şatir,et al.  User satisfaction with EISs: meeting the needs of executive users , 1993 .

[25]  Robert G. Fichman,et al.  International Conference on Information Systems ( ICIS ) 1992 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DIFFUSION : A REVIEW OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH , 2017 .

[26]  J. Kimberly,et al.  Organizational innovation: the influence of individual, organizational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations. , 1981, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[27]  H. Kaiser,et al.  Little Jiffy, Mark Iv , 1974 .

[28]  Lee L. Gremillion Organization Size and Information System Use: An Empirical Study , 1984, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[29]  Joyce J. Elam,et al.  EIS adoption, use, and impact: the executive perspective , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..

[30]  R. Kelly Rainer,et al.  What does it take for successful executive information systems? , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..

[31]  Hugh J. Watson,et al.  Using EIS to respond to dynamic business conditions , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..

[32]  R. Zmud An Examination of Push-Pull Theory Applied to Process Innovation in Knowledge Work , 1984 .

[33]  James F. Courtney,et al.  A Field Study of Organizational Factors Influencing DSS Success , 1985, MIS Q..

[34]  William H. DeLone Determinants of Success for Computer Usage in Small Business , 1988, MIS Q..

[35]  Richard W. Scamell,et al.  The effect of information sources and communication channels on the diffusion of innovation in a data base development environment , 1990 .

[36]  Albert L. Lederer,et al.  The Impact of the Environment on the Management of Information Systems , 1990, Inf. Syst. Res..

[37]  Blake Ives,et al.  Executive Involvement and Participation in the Management of Information Technology , 1991, MIS Q..

[38]  Hugh J. Watson,et al.  Determining Information Requirements for an EIS , 1993, MIS Q..

[39]  Craig Barrow Implementing an Executive Information System: Seven Steps for Success , 1990 .

[40]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of Factors Influencing the Success of Customer-Oriented Strategic Systems , 1990, Inf. Syst. Res..

[41]  R. Kelly Rainer,et al.  Executive Information Systems: A Framework for Development and a Survey of Current Practices , 1991, MIS Q..

[42]  Varun Grover,et al.  The Initiation, Adoption, and Implementation of Telecommunications Technologies in U.S. Organizations , 1993, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[43]  P. H. Friesen,et al.  Innovation in Conservative and Entrepreneurial Firms: Two Models of Strategic Momentum , 1982 .

[44]  Christopher A. Higgins,et al.  Executive Support Systems and Learning: A Model and Empirical Test , 1995, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[45]  Louis Raymond,et al.  Organizational Characteristics and MIS Success in the Context of Small Business , 1985, MIS Q..

[46]  Louis Raymond,et al.  Organizational Context and Information Systems Success: A Contingency Approach , 1990, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[47]  Robert B. Adams,et al.  EIS: It Can Work in the Public Sector , 1990, MIS Q..

[48]  E. Vanlommel,et al.  The Organization of Electronic Data Processing (EDP) Activities and Computer Use , 1975 .

[49]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  The Effectiveness of External Information Channels in Facilitating Innovation Within Software Development Groups , 1983, MIS Q..

[50]  Arun Rai,et al.  A Structural Model for CASE Adoption Behavior , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[51]  W. R. King,et al.  Decision Processes for Developing Strategic Applications of Information Systems: A Contingency Approach* , 1992 .

[52]  K. Rapley,et al.  Factors critical to the success of executive information systems in British Airways , 1991 .

[53]  Kathryn Rudie Harrigan,et al.  Research Methodologies for Contingency Approaches to Business Strategy , 1983 .