Ground motion prediction equations and seismic hazard analyses are used to evaluate design-basis ground motions that apply to a free-field and ground surface condition. In this paper, we address the manner by which those motions can be utilized for the analysis and design of buildings with subterranean levels. Procedures for specifying ground motions in buildings that are utilized in current practice fail to account for kinematic interaction effects, which cause reductions of ground motion translation and the introduction of rocking for embedded foundations. Simple models that describe those effects (reduction of translation, introduction of rocking) for embedded rigid cylinders are reviewed. Those models are well validated by recordings from two nuclear reactor structures that have very stiff embedded foundations. Most building structures will not have foundations as stiff as those from the nuclear reactor structures, and hence the degree to which foundation flexibility might affect the motions of embedded foundations was investigated using data from appropriately instrumented buildings. Preliminary analysis of the data suggests that: (a) the foundations are not rigid and rigid body displacements and rotations of the foundation explain only 60–80% of the power of the motion at the ground level; (b) using available models for kinematic interaction of embedded foundations, translational motions at the ground level of the investigated sites are dominated by base translation, with relatively small contributions from base rocking; and (c) for the investigated buildings, base rocking from inertial interaction appears to be more significant in the frequency range of principal interest than base rocking from kinematic interaction. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
[1]
Mihailo D. Trifunac,et al.
Antiplane response of a dike on flexible embedded foundation to incident SH-waves
,
2001
.
[2]
G. Gazetas.
FORMULAS AND CHARTS FOR IMPEDANCES OF SURFACE AND EMBEDDED FOUNDATIONS
,
1991
.
[3]
H. R. Riggs,et al.
Influence of foundation flexibility on soil‐structure interaction
,
1985
.
[4]
Gin-Show Liou,et al.
EFFECT OF FLEXIBILITY ON IMPEDANCE FUNCTIONS FOR CIRCULAR FOUNDATION
,
1994
.
[5]
Michio Iguchi,et al.
Vibration of Flexible Plate on Viscoelastic Medium
,
1982
.
[6]
Jonathan P. Stewart,et al.
Empirical Evaluation of Inertial Soil-Structure Interaction Effects
,
1998
.
[7]
Pacific Earthquake,et al.
Empirical Evaluation of Inertial Soil-Structure Interaction Effects
,
1998
.
[8]
D. J. Wilson,et al.
SOIL-PILE-SUPERSTRUCTURE INTERACTION IN LIQUEFYING SAND AND SOFT CLAY
,
1998
.
[9]
H. Seed,et al.
Analysis of Local Variations in Free Field Seismic Ground Motion.
,
1981
.
[10]
J. Stewart,et al.
KINEMATIC SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION FROM STRONG MOTION RECORDINGS
,
2003
.
[11]
Akira Mita,et al.
Dynamic response of a square foundation embedded in an elastic half-space
,
1989
.
[12]
P. Welch.
The use of fast Fourier transform for the estimation of power spectra: A method based on time averaging over short, modified periodograms
,
1967
.
[13]
Eduardo Kausel,et al.
The spring method for embedded foundations
,
1978
.