Chinese Classifiers and Count Nouns

Many linguists, philosophers, and anthropologists hold that classifier languages, including Chinese, Japanese, Korean, and Thai, have no count nouns, and that all their common nouns are mass nouns. This paper argues that Chinese draws a syntactic, as well as semantic, distinction between mass and count nouns, and suggests how the approach taken to clarify the distinction can be extended to other classifier languages.

[1]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The Number Sense: How the Mind Creates Mathematics. , 1998 .

[2]  Harry Bunt,et al.  Mass Terms and Model-Theoretic Semantics , 1985 .

[3]  Takashi Iida Professor Quine on Japanese Classifiers , 1998 .

[4]  Charles N. Li,et al.  Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar , 1989 .

[5]  S. E. Martin A Reference Grammar of Japanese , 1975 .

[6]  Ho-min Sohn,et al.  The Korean language , 1999 .

[7]  Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald,et al.  Classifiers: A Typology of Noun Categorization Devices , 2000 .

[8]  David Gil Scopal quantifiers: some universale of lexical effability , 1992 .

[9]  Richard Sharvy,et al.  Maybe English Has no Count Nouns: Notes on Chinese Semantics , 1978 .

[10]  Chad Hansen Mass Nouns and a White Horse Is Not a Horse , 1976 .

[11]  Otto Jespersen,et al.  The Philosophy of Grammar , 1924 .

[12]  Mutsurni Irnai,et al.  A cross-linguistic study of early word meaning : universal ontology and linguistic influence , 1994 .

[13]  S. E. Martin,et al.  A Reference Grammar of Korean , 1975 .

[14]  Chad Hansen,et al.  Language and logic in ancient China , 1983 .

[15]  J. Lucy,et al.  Grammatical categories and cognition: References , 1992 .

[16]  趙 元任,et al.  A grammar of spoken Chinese = 中國話的文法 , 1968 .

[17]  W. Quine Ontological Relativity and Other Essays , 1969 .

[18]  Godehard Link Algebraic semantics in language and philosophy , 1997 .

[19]  G. Chierchia,et al.  Reference to Kinds across Language , 1998 .

[20]  Beom-Mo Kang,et al.  Plurality and other semantic aspects of common nouns in Korean , 1994 .