A multi-objective optimization of the integrated copper-chlorine cycle for hydrogen production

Abstract This paper considers a multi-objective optimization study performed on an integrated copper-chlorine cycle for hydrogen production developed and built at the Ontario Tech. University using genetic algorithm. The system is thermodynamically modeled in the Aspen-plus software considering all components in the cycle. A varied range of steam-to-copper ratios is selected for this study and four different cases are considered based on various steam input temperatures. The objective of this study is to maximize the rate of hydrogen production and overall system exergy efficiency, hence minimizing overall cost of cycle operation. The results of the multi-objective optimization study are presented in the form of the Pareto frontier solutions for identification of the optimal points. A comparison of the optimization results with Aspen-plus simulations is also presented for validation purposes. For all the cases considered, the optimal trade-off point results in steam-to-copper ratios ranging from 15.7 to 16.9. The steam input temperature is found to have a significant influence on the exergy efficiency and overall operating cost. The highest exergy efficiency is reported as 17.8% at a steam input temperature of 300 °C, while the minimum exergy efficiency is obtained to be 6.5% at a steam input temperature of 25 °C.

[1]  Ibrahim Dincer,et al.  Optimization of Energy Systems , 2017 .

[2]  E. Chalkova,et al.  CuCl-HCl Electrolyzer for Hydrogen Production via Cu-Cl Thermochemical Cycle , 2009 .

[3]  G. Naterer,et al.  Industrial heat recovery from a steel furnace for the cogeneration of electricity and hydrogen with the copper-chlorine cycle , 2018, Energy Conversion and Management.

[4]  Wei Wu,et al.  Design and energy evaluation of a stand‐alone copper‐chlorine (Cu‐Cl) thermochemical cycle system for trigeneration of electricity, hydrogen, and oxygen , 2018 .

[5]  Tamer Khatib,et al.  Multiobjective differential evolution algorithm-based sizing of a standalone photovoltaic water pumping system , 2016 .

[6]  Asheesh Kumar,et al.  Investigations on the hydrolysis step of copper‐chlorine thermochemical cycle for hydrogen production , 2019, International Journal of Energy Research.

[7]  I. Dincer,et al.  Sustainable hydrogen production options and the role of IAHE , 2012 .

[8]  Michele A. Lewis,et al.  Hydrolysis of CuCl2 in the Cu–Cl thermochemical cycle for hydrogen production: Experimental studies using a spray reactor with an ultrasonic atomizer , 2010 .

[9]  François Maréchal,et al.  Multi-objective optimization of SNG production from microalgae through hydrothermal gasification , 2015, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[10]  Ibrahim Dincer,et al.  Development of a four-step Cu–Cl cycle for hydrogen production – Part II: Multi-objective optimization , 2016 .

[11]  A. T-Raissi.  Water Splitting: Thermochemical , 2011 .

[12]  Mikhail Sorin,et al.  Retrofit of low-temperature heat recovery industrial systems using multiobjective exergoeconomic optimization , 2016 .

[13]  Swati Mohanty,et al.  Multiobjective optimization of synthesis gas production using non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm , 2006, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[14]  Ibrahim Dincer,et al.  Exergy, exergoeconomic and environmental analyses and evolutionary algorithm based multi-objective o , 2011 .

[15]  P. Ekins,et al.  The role of hydrogen and fuel cells in the global energy system , 2019, Energy & Environmental Science.

[16]  S. Khanmohammadi,et al.  Exergoeconomic analysis and multi objective optimization of a solar based integrated energy system for hydrogen production , 2017 .

[17]  M. Fattahi,et al.  Modelling-based Optimisation of the Direct Synthesis of Dimethyl Ether from Syngas in a Commercial Slurry Reactor , 2013 .

[18]  Lin Zhu,et al.  Performance analysis of a feasible technology for power and high-purity hydrogen production driven by methane fuel , 2015 .

[19]  I. Dincer,et al.  Thermodynamic viability of a new three step high temperature Cu-Cl cycle for hydrogen production , 2018, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy.

[20]  I. Dincer,et al.  A review and comparative evaluation of thermochemical water splitting cycles for hydrogen production , 2020 .

[21]  Andrea Toffolo,et al.  Evolutionary algorithms for multi-objective energetic and economic optimization in thermal system design , 2002 .

[22]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II , 2002, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[23]  Hoseyn Sayyaadi,et al.  Conceptual design, process integration, and optimization of a solar Cu Cl thermochemical hydrogen production plant , 2017 .