Using Probes for Sharing (Tacit) Knowing in Participatory Design: Facilitating Perspective Making and Perspective Taking

Abstract The sharing of expertise and tacit knowing is one of the core objectives in participatory design projects. This paper focuses on the role of probes for sharing users’ tacit knowing. We will introduce the concept of “boundary objects” [22], [21] to analyse how probes facilitate perspective taking and perspective making between users and between users and researchers. In so doing, we demonstrate that probes can facilitate the sharing of users’ tacit knowing and expertise (i) by making and explicating individual users’ perspectives, (ii) by enabling participants to take each other’s perspective and make a joint perspective and (iii) by subsequently enabling the making of a joint vision on the digital design outcome. The research presented in this paper is based on an EU-funded research and innovation project in which we co-created digital neighbourhood guide with older adults. We report from our fieldwork in city 1, where we used probes as part of our participatory design practice.

[1]  Pieter Jan Stappers,et al.  Probes, toolkits and prototypes: three approaches to making in codesigning , 2014 .

[2]  Allison Druin,et al.  Technology probes: inspiring design for and with families , 2003, CHI '03.

[3]  Patrick Olivier,et al.  Configuring participation: on how we involve people in design , 2013, CHI.

[4]  Pieter Jan Stappers,et al.  Co-creation and the new landscapes of design , 2008 .

[5]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Material knowing: the scaffolding of human knowledgeability , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[6]  Harold Maurice Collins,et al.  Expertise: from attribute to attribution and back again? , 2007 .

[7]  M. Polanyi Chapter 7 – The Tacit Dimension , 1997 .

[8]  Mary Beth Rosson,et al.  Participatory design in community informatics , 2007 .

[9]  J. Wiles,et al.  The meaning of "aging in place" to older people. , 2012, The Gerontologist.

[10]  Paul Dourish,et al.  How HCI interprets the probes , 2007, CHI.

[11]  Pelle Ehn,et al.  Participation in design things , 2008, PDC.

[12]  Ramkrishnan V. Tenkasi,et al.  P ERSPECTIVE M AKING AND P ERSPECTIVE T AKING IN C OMMUNITIES OF K NOWING , 2000 .

[13]  Susan Gasson,et al.  The Dynamics of Sensemaking, Knowledge, and Expertise in Collaborative, Boundary-Spanning Design , 2005, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[14]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing , 2002, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[15]  Martin R. Gibbs,et al.  A magic box for understanding intergenerational play , 2006, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[16]  S. L. Star,et al.  This is Not a Boundary Object: Reflections on the Origin of a Concept , 2010 .

[17]  Ulrike Gerhard,et al.  Using cultural probes for co-creating a digital neighbourhood guide with and for older adults , 2017, MuC Workshopband.

[18]  P. Ehn,et al.  Design Things and Design Thinking: Contemporary Participatory Design Challenges , 2012, Design Issues.

[19]  William W. Gaver,et al.  Design: Cultural probes , 1999, INTR.

[20]  Tone Bratteteig,et al.  Unpacking the Notion of Participation in Participatory Design , 2016, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[21]  L. Sproull,et al.  Coordinating Expertise in Software Development Teams , 2000 .

[22]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[23]  Tuuli Mattelmäki,et al.  Mobile probes , 2004, NordiCHI '04.