Determining the sexual identities of prehistoric cave artists using digitized handprints: a machine learning approach

The sexual identities of human handprints inform hypotheses regarding the roles of males and females in prehistoric contexts. Sexual identity has previously been manually determined by measuring the ratios of the lengths of the individual's fingers as well as by using other physical features. Most conventional studies measure the lengths manually and thus are often constrained by the lack of scaling information on published images. We have created a method that determines sex by applying modern machine-learning techniques to relative measures obtained from images of human hands. This is the known attempt at substituting automated methods for time-consuming manual measurement in the study of sexual identities of prehistoric cave artists. Our study provides quantitative evidence relevant to sexual dimorphism and the sexual division of labor in Upper Paleolithic societies. In addition to analyzing historical handprint records, this method has potential applications in criminal forensics and human-computer interaction.

[1]  B. Ripley,et al.  Pattern Recognition , 1968, Nature.

[2]  Maurice K. Wong,et al.  Algorithm AS136: A k-means clustering algorithm. , 1979 .

[3]  Ronald L. Rivest,et al.  Introduction to Algorithms , 1990 .

[4]  John R. Kender,et al.  Finding skin in color images , 1996, Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition.

[5]  Sharath Pankanti,et al.  A Prototype Hand Geometry-based Verication System , 1999 .

[6]  James Ze Wang,et al.  SIMPLIcity: Semantics-Sensitive Integrated Matching for Picture LIbraries , 2000, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[7]  Harry Wechsler,et al.  Mixture of experts for classification of gender, ethnic origin, and pose of human faces , 2000, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks Learn. Syst..

[8]  Pengcheng Shi,et al.  Peg-Free Hand Geometry Recognition Using Hierarchical Geomrtry and Shape Matching , 2002, MVA.

[9]  Ming-Hsuan Yang,et al.  Learning Gender with Support Faces , 2002, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[10]  Mohammed Yeasin,et al.  Support Vector Learning for Gender Classification Using Audio and Visual Cues , 2003, Int. J. Pattern Recognit. Artif. Intell..

[11]  Hui Gao,et al.  An expressive three-mode principal components model for gender recognition. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[12]  Sachin Jambawalikar,et al.  Hand Recognition Using Geometric Classifiers , 2004, ICBA.

[13]  James Ze Wang,et al.  Digital imagery for significant cultural and historical materials , 2005, International Journal on Digital Libraries.

[14]  R. D. Guthrie The nature of Paleolithic art , 2005 .

[15]  D. Snow Sexual dimorphism in Upper Palaeolithic hand stencils , 2006, Antiquity.

[16]  Mark Gahegan,et al.  Cybertools and Archaeology , 2006, Science.

[17]  R. G. Gunn Hand sizes in rock art: interpreting the measurements of hand stencils and prints , 2006 .

[18]  Bülent Sankur,et al.  Shape-based hand recognition , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[19]  Sergios Theodoridis,et al.  Pattern Recognition, Third Edition , 2006 .