Statistics and Probabilities as a Means to Support Fingerprint Examination

[1]  Simon A. Cole,et al.  Grandfathering Evidence: Fingerprint Admissibility Rulings from Jennings to Llera Plaza and Back Again , 2004 .

[2]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Beyond Minutiae: A Fingerprint Individuality Model with Pattern, Ridge and Pore Features , 2009, ICB.

[3]  Henry Faulds,et al.  On the Skin-Furrows of the Hand , 1880, Nature.

[4]  V. Galera,et al.  Biological variability of the minutiae in the fingerprints of a sample of the Spanish population. , 2007, Forensic Science International.

[5]  David J. Spiegelhalter,et al.  Statistical methods for healthcare regulation: rating, screening and surveillance , 2012 .

[6]  Didier Meuwly,et al.  Computation of Likelihood Ratios in Fingerprint Identification for Configurations of Three Minutiæ , 2006, Journal of forensic sciences.

[7]  Sargur N. Srihari,et al.  A Computational Discriminability Analysis on Twin Fingerprints , 2009, IWCF.

[8]  Christophe Champod,et al.  Computation of Likelihood Ratios in Fingerprint Identification for Configurations of Any Number of Minutiæ , 2007, Journal of forensic sciences.

[9]  Simon A. Cole,et al.  Forensics Without Uniqueness, Conclusions Without Individualization: The New Epistemology of Forensic Identification , 2009 .

[10]  Cedric Neumann,et al.  Quantitative assessment of evidential weight for a fingerprint comparison I. Generalisation to the comparison of a mark with set of ten prints from a suspect. , 2011, Forensic science international.

[11]  G. Steinman.  Mechanisms of twinning. I. Effect of environmental diversity on genetic expression in monozygotic multifetal pregnancies. , 2001, The Journal of reproductive medicine.

[12]  D A Stoney,et al.  What made us ever think we could individualize using statistics? , 1991, Journal - Forensic Science Society.

[13]  Niko Brümmer,et al.  Application-independent evaluation of speaker detection , 2006, Comput. Speech Lang..

[14]  Jennifer L. Mnookin,et al.  The Need for a Research Culture in the Forensic Sciences , 2011 .

[15]  Simon A. Cole.  Out of the Daubert Fire and into the Fryeing Pan? Self-Validation, Meta-Expertise and the Admissibility of Latent Print Evidence in Frye Jurisdictions , 2008 .

[16]  J L Peterson,et al.  Crime laboratory proficiency testing results, 1978-1991, II: Resolving questions of common origin. , 1995, Journal of forensic sciences.

[17]  Jonathan J. Koehler,et al.  The Individualization Fallacy in Forensic Science Evidence , 2008 .

[18]  Ralph Norman Haber,et al.  Scientific validation of fingerprint evidence under Daubert , 2007 .

[19]  Siomon A. Cole,et al.  More than Zero: Accounting for Error in Latent Fingerprint Identification , 2007 .

[20]  Cedric Neumann,et al.  Quantitative assessment of evidential weight for a fingerprint comparison. Part II: a generalisation to take account of the general pattern. , 2012, Forensic science international.

[21]  Sharath Pankanti,et al.  On the similarity of identical twin fingerprints , 2002, Pattern Recognit..

[22]  Arun Ross,et al.  From Template to Image: Reconstructing Fingerprints from Minutiae Points , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[23]  I. Dror,et al.  Contextual information renders experts vulnerable to making erroneous identifications. , 2006, Forensic science international.

[24]  J. Koehler,et al.  The Coming Paradigm Shift in Forensic Identification Science , 2005, Science.

[25]  Jonathan J. Koehler,et al.  Fingerprint Error Rates and Proficiency Tests: What They are and Why They Matter , 2008 .

[26]  Whose Fault? - Daubert, the NAS Report, and the Notion of Error in Forensic Science , 2010 .

[27]  E. Gutiérrez-Redomero,et al.  Distribution of the minutiae in the fingerprints of a sample of the Spanish population. , 2011, Forensic science international.

[28]  Doroteo Torre Toledano,et al.  Emulating DNA: Rigorous Quantification of Evidential Weight in Transparent and Testable Forensic Speaker Recognition , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing.

[29]  J A Lambert,et al.  A model for case assessment and interpretation. , 1998, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[30]  R. A. Hicklin,et al.  Accuracy and reliability of forensic latent fingerprint decisions , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  Ralph Norman Haber,et al.  Error Rates for Human Latent Fingerprint Examiners , 2004 .

[32]  F Taroni,et al.  Decision theoretic properties of forensic identification: underlying logic and argumentative implications. , 2008, Forensic science international.

[33]  Sharath Pankanti,et al.  On the Individuality of Fingerprints , 2002, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[34]  T. Reed,et al.  High heritability of fingertip arch patterns in twin‐pairs , 2006, American journal of medical genetics. Part A.

[35]  The good, the bad, the ugly: the NAS report on strengthening forensic science in America. , 2010, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[36]  Stephen E. Fienberg,et al.  Discussion on the paper by Spiegelhalter, Sherlaw-Johnson, Bardsley, Blunt, Wood and Grigg , 2012 .

[37]  Christophe Champod.  Fingerprint examination: towards more transparency , 2007 .

[38]  John Berry,et al.  History and Development of Fingerprinting , 2001 .

[39]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Statistical Models for Assessing the Individuality of Fingerprints , 2007, IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur..

[40]  Pat A Wertheim,et al.  Testing for Potential Contextual Bias Effects During the Verification Stage of the ACE‐V Methodology when Conducting Fingerprint Comparisons * , 2009, Journal of forensic sciences.

[41]  Cedric Neumann,et al.  Operational benefits and challenges of the use of fingerprint statistical models: a field study. , 2011, Forensic science international.