Effect of number of pontics and impression technique on the accuracy of four‐unit monolithic zirconia fixed dental prostheses

[1]  S. Bayne,et al.  Considerations in measurement of marginal fit. , 1989, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[2]  M. Molin,et al.  The fit of gold inlays and three ceramic inlay systems. A clinical and in vitro study. , 1993, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[3]  M. Tuntiprawon,et al.  The effect of cement thickness on the fracture strength of all-ceramic crowns. , 1995, Australian dental journal.

[4]  T. Gerds,et al.  Influence of framework configuration on the marginal adaptation of zirconium dioxide ceramic anterior four-unit frameworks , 2005, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[5]  F. Beuer,et al.  Digital dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations , 2008, BDJ.

[6]  J. Schmitt,et al.  Clinical fit of four-unit zirconia posterior fixed dental prostheses. , 2008, European journal of oral sciences.

[7]  G. Christensen.  The challenge to conventional impressions. , 2008, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[8]  P. Vigolo,et al.  An in vitro evaluation of fit of zirconium-oxide-based ceramic four-unit fixed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD/CAM systems, before and after porcelain firing cycles and after glaze cycles. , 2008, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[9]  F. Beuer,et al.  Marginal fit of 14-unit zirconia fixed dental prosthesis retainers. , 2009, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[10]  Sunghuen Kim,et al.  Influence of porcelain veneering on the marginal fit of Digident and Lava CAD/CAM zirconia ceramic crowns , 2010, The journal of advanced prosthodontics.

[11]  Alex Touchstone,et al.  Digital transition: the collaboration between dentists and laboratory technicians on CAD/CAM restorations. , 2010, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[12]  J Abduo,et al.  Fit of zirconia fixed partial denture: a systematic review. , 2010, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[13]  J. Griggs,et al.  Flexural strength and failure modes of layered ceramic structures. , 2011, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[14]  K. Chung,et al.  Survival and complications of zirconia-based fixed dental prostheses: a systematic review. , 2012, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[15]  S. Rinke,et al.  Multifactorial analysis of the impact of different manufacturing processes on the marginal fit of zirconia copings. , 2012, Dental materials journal.

[16]  A. Mehl,et al.  New CAD/CAM materials and blocks for chairside procedures. , 2013, International journal of computerized dentistry.

[17]  D. Edelhoff,et al.  Marginal and internal fit of four-unit zirconia fixed dental prostheses based on digital and conventional impression techniques , 2013, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[18]  Mathieu Contrepois,et al.  Marginal adaptation of ceramic crowns: a systematic review. , 2013, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[19]  A. Wennerberg,et al.  The clinical success of zirconia-based crowns: a systematic review. , 2014, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[20]  P. Weigl,et al.  Evaluation of fit and efficiency of CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic restorations based on direct and indirect digitalization: a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial , 2016, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[21]  A. Mehl,et al.  In-vitro evaluation of the accuracy of conventional and digital methods of obtaining full-arch dental impressions. , 2015, Quintessence international.

[22]  Guillermo Pradies,et al.  Clinical evaluation comparing the fit of all-ceramic crowns obtained from silicone and digital intraoral impressions , 2015, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[23]  Jian Sun,et al.  Comparison of repeatability between intraoral digital scanner and extraoral digital scanner: An in-vitro study. , 2015, Journal of prosthodontic research.

[24]  T. Attin,et al.  Influence of material surface on the scanning error of a powder-free 3D measuring system , 2015, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[25]  J. Güth,et al.  Fit of 4-unit FDPs from CoCr and zirconia after conventional and digital impressions , 2015, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[26]  Wael Att,et al.  Precision of Dental Implant Digitization Using Intraoral Scanners. , 2016, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[27]  Jian Sun,et al.  Comparison of marginal and internal fit of 3-unit ceramic fixed dental prostheses made with either a conventional or digital impression. , 2016, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[28]  C. Gonzaga,et al.  Marginal and internal fit of zirconia copings obtained using different digital scanning methods. , 2016, Brazilian oral research.

[29]  Daniel Edelhoff,et al.  Accuracy of five intraoral scanners compared to indirect digitalization , 2016, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[30]  M. Behr,et al.  In-vitro fatigue and fracture testing of CAD/CAM-materials in implant-supported molar crowns. , 2017, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[31]  P. Vallittu,et al.  Digital Versus Conventional Impressions in Fixed Prosthodontics: A Review , 2018, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.