A Scaling Model for Estimating Time-Series Party Positions from Texts

However, existing text-based methods face challenges in producing valid and reliable time-series data. This article proposes a scaling algorithm called WORDFISH to estimate policy positions based on word frequencies in texts. The technique allows researchers to locate parties in one or multiple elections. We demonstrate the algorithm by estimating the positions of German political parties from 1990 to 2005 using word frequencies in party manifestos. The extracted positions reflect changes in the party system more accurately than existing time-series estimates. In addition, the method allows researchers to examine which words are important for placing parties on the left and on the right. We find that words with strong political connotations are the best discriminators between parties. Finally, a series of robustness checks demonstrate that the estimated positions are insensitive to distributional assumptions and document selection.

[1]  T. Schulz,et al.  Left—Right Positions of Political Parties in Switzerland , 2007 .

[2]  H. Klingemann.  Party Positions and Voter Orientations , 1998 .

[3]  Martin Jansche,et al.  Parametric Models of Linguistic Count Data , 2003, ACL.

[4]  J. T. Wulu,et al.  Regression analysis of count data , 2002 .

[5]  Kenneth Ward Church,et al.  Poisson mixtures , 1995, Natural Language Engineering.

[6]  K. T. Poole,et al.  A Spatial Model for Legislative Roll Call Analysis , 1985 .

[7]  Robert J. Franzese,et al.  Macroeconomic policies of developed democracies , 2002 .

[8]  M. Laver,et al.  Extracting Policy Positions from Political Texts Using Words as Data , 2003, American Political Science Review.

[9]  M. Laver,et al.  Estimating Party Policy Positions with Uncertainty Based on Manifesto Codings , 2007 .

[10]  Lanny W. Martin,et al.  A Robust Transformation Procedure for Interpreting Political Text , 2007, Political Analysis.

[11]  Scott J. Basinger,et al.  Internationalization and Changes in Tax Policy in OECD Countries , 1998 .

[12]  M. Wallerstein.  Wage-Setting Institutions and Pay Inequality in Advanced Industrial Societies , 1999 .

[13]  Anatol Rapoport,et al.  Coalition theories and cabinet formations: A study of formal theories of coalition formation applied to nine European parliaments after 1918 , 1973 .

[14]  Till Blume,et al.  Policy change without government change? German gridlock after the 2002 election , 2003 .

[15]  James N. Druckman,et al.  The Importance of Concurrence: The Impact of Bicameralism on Government Formation and Duration , 2002 .

[16]  André Kaiser.  George Tsebelis, Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work, Princeton 2002 , 2007 .

[17]  John D. Huber,et al.  Expert Interpretations of Party Space and Party Locations in 42 Societies , 1995 .

[18]  Christopher Bishop,et al.  Proceedings of the Ninth International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics , 2003 .

[19]  Paul V. Warwick.  Ideological Diversity and Government Survival in Western European Parliamentary Democracies , 1992 .

[20]  David Madigan,et al.  On the Naive Bayes Model for Text Categorization , 2003, AISTATS.

[21]  G. King,et al.  Unifying Political Methodology: The Likelihood Theory of Statistical Inference , 1989 .

[22]  I. Budge,et al.  Mapping Policy Preferences: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments 1945-1998 , 2001 .

[23]  Frederick Mosteller,et al.  Applied Bayesian and classical inference : the case of the Federalist papers , 1984 .

[24]  Kathleen Bawn.  Money and Majorities in the Federal Republic of Germany: Evidence for a Veto Players Model of Government Spending , 1999 .

[25]  Pravin K. Trivedi,et al.  Regression Analysis of Count Data , 1998 .

[26]  James N. Druckman,et al.  Influence Without Confidence: Upper Chambers and Government Formation , 2005 .

[27]  G. McLachlan,et al.  The EM algorithm and extensions , 1996 .

[28]  George Tsebelis,et al.  Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work , 2002 .

[29]  D. Holmes.  The Analysis of Literary Style — a Review , 1985 .

[30]  I. Budge,et al.  Do they work?: Validating computerised word frequency estimates against policy series , 2007 .

[31]  Keith T. Poole,et al.  Measuring Bias and Uncertainty in Ideal Point Estimates via the Parametric Bootstrap , 2004, Political Analysis.

[32]  Michael Laver,et al.  Party Policy and Government Coalitions , 1992 .

[33]  Kaare W. Strøm,et al.  Minority Governments in Parliamentary Democracies , 1984 .

[34]  M. Laver.  Legislatures and Parliaments in Comparative Context , 2008 .

[35]  Jonathan B. Slapin,et al.  Institutions and coalition formation: The German election of 2005 , 2006 .

[36]  Kenneth Benoit,et al.  Party Policy in Modern Democracies , 2006 .

[37]  M. Laver,et al.  Benchmarks for text analysis: A response to Budge and Pennings , 2007 .

[38]  Andrew McCallum,et al.  A comparison of event models for naive bayes text classification , 1998, AAAI 1998.

[39]  Nicolas W. Hengartner,et al.  Quantitative Analysis of Literary Styles , 2002 .

[40]  C. Crombez.  Minority governments, minimal winning coalitions and surplus majorities in parliamentary systems , 1994 .

[41]  David D. Lewis,et al.  Naive (Bayes) at Forty: The Independence Assumption in Information Retrieval , 1998, ECML.

[42]  G. Garrett,et al.  Partisan Politics in the Global Economy , 1998 .

[43]  John D. Huber,et al.  Putting Parties in Their Place: Inferring Party Left-Right Ideological Positions from Party Manifestos Data , 2000 .

[44]  M. Laver,et al.  Policy and Party Competition , 1992 .

[45]  Michael Laver,et al.  Estimating the Policy Position of Political Actors , 2003 .

[46]  David P. Baron,et al.  A Spatial Bargaining Theory of Government Formation in Parliamentary Systems , 1991, American Political Science Review.

[47]  I. Budge,et al.  Ideology, strategy and party change : spatial analyses of post-war election programmes in 19 democracies , 1987 .