Assessment of group versus individual diabetes education: a randomized study.

OBJECTIVES The current study was conducted to compare the effectiveness of delivering diabetes education in either a group or individual setting using a consistent, evidence-based curriculum. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS A total of 170 subjects with type 2 diabetes were randomly assigned to either group (n = 87) or individual (n = 83) educational settings. Subjects received education in four sequential sessions delivered at consistent time intervals over a 6-month period. Outcomes included changes in knowledge, self-management behaviors, weight, BMI, HbA(1c), health-related quality of life, patient attitudes, and medication regimen. Changes were assessed at baseline and after the 2-week, 3-month, and 6-month education sessions. RESULTS Both educational settings had similar improvements in knowledge, BMI, health-related quality of life, attitudes, and all other measured indicators. HbA(1c) decreased from 8.5 +/- 1.8% at baseline to 6.5 +/- 0.8% at 6 months (P < 0.01) in the study population as a whole. Subjects assigned to the individual setting had a 1.7 +/- 1.9% reduction in HbA(1c) (P < 0.01), whereas subjects assigned to the group setting had a 2.5 +/- 1.8% reduction in HbA(1c) (P < 0.01). The difference in HbA(1c) improvement was marginally greater in subjects assigned to group education versus individualized education (P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates that diabetes education delivered in a group setting, when compared with an individual setting, was equally effective at providing equivalent or slightly greater improvements in glycemic control. Group diabetes education was similarly effective in delivering key educational components and may allow for more efficient and cost-effective methods in the delivery of diabetes education programs.

[1]  M. Peeples,et al.  National Diabetes Education Outcomes System: Application to Practice , 2000 .

[2]  S A Brown,et al.  Studies of educational interventions and outcomes in diabetic adults: a meta-analysis revisited. , 1990, Patient education and counseling.

[3]  Mikael Fortelius,et al.  Cutting edge , 2009 .

[4]  K. Glanz,et al.  Health Behavior and Health Education , 1990 .

[5]  White Ms.  Construct for public health nursing. , 1982 .

[6]  L. Delahanty,et al.  The Role of Diet Behaviors in Achieving Improved Glycemic Control in Intensively Treated Patients in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial , 1993, Diabetes Care.

[7]  M. Peeples,et al.  Diabetes Education Outcomes: What Educators are Doing , 2000, The Diabetes educator.

[8]  John E. Ware,et al.  SF-36 physical and mental health summary scales : a user's manual , 1994 .

[9]  R. Bergenstal,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of medical nutrition therapy provided by dietitians for persons with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. , 1995, Journal of the American Dietetic Association.

[10]  B. Peterson,et al.  Nurse Case Management To Improve Glycemic Control in Diabetic Patients in a Health Maintenance Organization , 1998, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[11]  B. McLeod,et al.  Evaluation of a diabetes specialty centre: structure, process and outcome. , 1995, Patient education and counseling.

[12]  J. Boucher,et al.  National standards for diabetes self-management education. Task Force to Review and Revise the National Standards for Diabetes Self-Management Education Programs. , 2000, Diabetes care.

[13]  Sharon A. Brown.  Interventions to Promote Diabetes Self-Management: State of the Science , 1999, The Diabetes educator.

[14]  S. Norris,et al.  Effectiveness of self-management training in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. , 2001, Diabetes care.

[15]  K. Levit,et al.  National health expenditures in 1997: more slow growth. , 1998, Health affairs.

[16]  J. Prochaska,et al.  Changing for Good , 1994 .

[17]  I. Rosenstock,et al.  The health belief model: Explaining health behavior through expectancies. , 1990 .