Learning about environmental geometry: a flaw in Miller and Shettleworth's (2007) operant model.

Many studies have examined how humans and other animals reestablish a sense of direction following disorientation in enclosed environments. Results showing that geometric shape of an enclosure is typically encoded, sometimes to the exclusion of featural cues, have led to suggestions that geometry might be encoded in a dedicated geometric module. Recently, Miller and Shettleworth (2007) proposed that the reorientation task be viewed as an operant task and they presented an associative operant model that appears to account for many empirical findings from reorientation studies. In this paper we show that, although Miller and Shettleworth's insights into the operant nature of the reorientation task may be sound, their mathematical model has a serious flaw. We present simulations to illustrate the implications of the flaw. We also propose that the output of a simple neural network, the perceptron, can be used to conduct operant learning within the reorientation task and can solve the problem in Miller and Shettleworth's model.

[1]  K. Cheng A purely geometric module in the rat's spatial representation , 1986, Cognition.

[2]  M. Dawson,et al.  Minds and Machines: Connectionism and Psychological Modeling , 2003 .

[3]  H. Gulliksen A generalization of Thurstone's learning function , 1953 .

[4]  Michael R. W. Dawson,et al.  Simple Artificial Neural Networks That Match Probability and Exploit and Explore When Confronting a Multiarmed Bandit , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks.

[5]  M. Dawson,et al.  Connectionism: A Hands-on Approach , 2005 .

[6]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  A choice theory analysis of similarity judgments , 1961 .

[7]  F ROSENBLATT,et al.  The perceptron: a probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain. , 1958, Psychological review.

[8]  W. F. Prokasy,et al.  Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory. , 1972 .

[9]  A G Barto,et al.  Toward a modern theory of adaptive networks: expectation and prediction. , 1981, Psychological review.

[10]  R. Rescorla A theory of pavlovian conditioning: The effectiveness of reinforcement and non-reinforcement , 1972 .

[11]  M. Dawson,et al.  Connectionism and Classical Conditioning , 2008 .

[12]  R. Luce,et al.  The Choice Axiom after Twenty Years , 1977 .

[13]  G. Bower,et al.  From conditioning to category learning: an adaptive network model. , 1988 .

[14]  A. A. Mullin,et al.  Principles of neurodynamics , 1962 .

[15]  L. L. Thurstone,et al.  The Learning Function , 1930 .

[16]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Individual Choice Behavior , 1959 .

[17]  R. Herrnstein On the law of effect. , 1970, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[18]  S. Shettleworth,et al.  Learning about Environmental Geometry: an Associative Model , 2022 .

[19]  N. Newcombe,et al.  Is there a geometric module for spatial orientation? squaring theory and evidence , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.