Institutions Matter but … Organisational Alignment in Knowledge-Based Industries

A comparison of the current structures and dynamics of UK and German biotechnology-based industries reveals a striking convergence of industrial organisations and innovation directions in both countries. This counteracts propositions from theoretical frameworks such as the varieties-of-capitalism hypothesis and the national innovation systems approach which suggest substantial differences between the industrial structures of the countries due to differing institutional frameworks. In this paper, we question these approaches and show that the observed structural alignment can be explained by the network organisation of research and production in knowledge-based industries.

[1]  Andreas Pyka,et al.  Innovation Networks - A Simulation Approach , 2001, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[2]  M. Castells The rise of the network society , 1996 .

[3]  Andreas Pyka,et al.  Applied Evolutionary Economics and Social Simulation , 2004, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[4]  P. Saviotti,et al.  The evolution of R&D networking in the biotech industries , 2005 .

[5]  B. Amable The Diversity Of Modern Capitalism , 2003 .

[6]  C. Matraves German Industrial Structure in Comparative Perspective , 1997 .

[7]  R. Boyer,et al.  Les systèmes d'innovation : à l'ère de la globalisation , 1997 .

[8]  Carine Staropoli Cooperation in R&D in the pharmaceutical industry — The network as an organizational innovation governing technological innovation , 1998 .

[9]  Johanna L. Francis,et al.  Creating a Cluster While Building a Firm: Entrepreneurs and the Formation of Industrial Clusters , 2005 .

[10]  B. Lundvall,et al.  International benchmarking as a policy learning tool , 2002 .

[11]  Steven Casper,et al.  NATIONAL INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORKS AND THE HYBRIDIZATION OF ENTREPRENEURIAL BUSINESS MODELS: THE GERMAN AND UK BIOTECHNOLOGY SECTORS , 2001 .

[12]  Roberto Leombruni,et al.  Industry and labor dynamics : the agent-based computational economics approach : proceedings of the Wild@ace2003 workshop, Torino, Italy, 3-4 October 2003 , 2004 .

[13]  J. Fagerberg Schumpeter and the revival of evolutionary economics: an appraisal of the literature , 2003 .

[14]  D. North,et al.  Structure and Change in Economic History , 1983 .

[15]  Mark S. Granovetter,et al.  The Sociology of Economic Life , 1991 .

[16]  P. Cooke,et al.  The Associational Economy: Firms, Regions, and Innovation , 2000 .

[17]  F. Malerba Sectoral systems of innovation and production , 2002 .

[18]  D. Soskice German technology policy, innovation, and national institutional frameworks , 1997 .

[19]  W. Powell,et al.  Network Dynamics and Field Evolution: The Growth of Interorganizational Collaboration in the Life Sciences1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.

[20]  Pascal Petit,et al.  The diversity of social systems of innovation and production during the 1990s , 2001 .

[21]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  The Knowledge-Based Economy , 2006 .

[22]  Mancur Olson,et al.  The Rise and Decline of Nations: Economic Growth, Stagflation, and Social Rigidities. , 1984 .

[23]  Maria Joao Rodrigues,et al.  The New Knowledge Economy in Europe: A Strategy for International Competitiveness and Social Cohesion , 2003 .

[24]  Andreas Pyka,et al.  Innovation Networks in the Biotechnology-Based Sectors , 2001 .

[25]  D. North Structure and Change in Economic History , 1983 .

[26]  R. Nelson National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis , 1993 .

[27]  John Othick,et al.  The Rise and Decline of Nations: Economic Growth, Stagflation, and Social Rigidities. , 1983 .