Nonlinear goal programming models quantifying the bullwhip effect in supply chain based on ARIMA parameters

Abstract In less than half a century, the supply chain management (SCM) imposed itself as a strategic expertise. Today, it lands a new era, more complex, and must be the synonymous of competitive advantage. The supply chain has essentially served as a link between customers and products, producers and suppliers. The generation of the new supply chain (SC) should be evolutionary, and should be adjusted quickly to the rise or the decrease of the various customers’ demands. Several problems of the supply chain are superimposed such as the amplification of the demand, also called the bullwhip effect (BWE). This latter is a distortion in the market demand when this demand propagates from enterprise to enterprise. Finally, at the end of the chain, the supplier of raw materials receives completely uncertain commands. Our research aims to reduce, or even eliminate, the bullwhip effect in two respects-namely increase of the stock level and reduction of the service given back to customers. The solution that we propose to the bullwhip rests on, firstly, the use of the preference functions based on a statistical chronological series analysis (Box and Jenkins method) in order to construct the different models such as demand, stock level, and the order quantity. Secondly, the integration of the decision maker preference in the demand forecast and inventory management processes.

[1]  Frank Y. Chen,et al.  Quantifying the Bullwhip Effect in a Simple Supply Chain: The Impact of Forecasting, Lead Times, and Information.: The Impact of Forecasting, Lead Times, and Information. , 2000 .

[2]  Helena Ramalhinho Dias Lourenço,et al.  Supply Chain Management: An Opportunity For Metaheuristics , 2001 .

[3]  Jean-Marc Martel,et al.  Incorporating the Decision-maker's Preferences in the Goal-programming Model , 1990 .

[4]  D. Simchi-Levi,et al.  The impact of exponential smoothing forecasts on the bullwhip effect , 2000 .

[5]  Vineet Padmanabhan,et al.  Comments on "Information Distortion in a Supply Chain: The Bullwhip Effect" , 1997, Manag. Sci..

[6]  Ahmed K. Rifai,et al.  A note on the structure of the goal‐programming model: assessment and evaluation , 1996 .

[7]  Robert de Souza,et al.  Supply chain dynamics and optimization , 2000 .

[8]  Helena Ramalhinho-Lourenço,et al.  Supply chain management: An opportunity for metaheuristics , 2001 .

[9]  Yan Dong,et al.  TOWARDS BETTER COORDINATION OF THE SUPPLY CHAIN , 2001 .

[10]  Hau L. Lee,et al.  e-Business and Supply Chain Integration , 2004 .

[11]  D. Lambert,et al.  SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT -- MORE THAN A NEW NAME FOR LOGISTICS , 1997 .

[12]  C. Carlsson,et al.  A fuzzy approach to the bullwhip effect , 2000 .

[13]  Christer Carlsson,et al.  Reducing the bullwhip effect by means of intelligent, soft computing methods , 2001, Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[14]  Jean-Marc Martel,et al.  Estimation Through the Imprecise Goal Programming Model , 1997 .

[15]  Bernard W. Taylor,et al.  Operations Management: Focusing on Quality and Competitiveness , 1999 .

[16]  L. LeeHau,et al.  Information Distortion in a Supply Chain , 1997 .

[17]  Agostino Villa Introducing some Supply Chain Management problems , 2001 .

[18]  Jacques Teghem,et al.  O.R. for innovation and quality of life , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[19]  Hong Yan,et al.  Benefits of information sharing with supply chain partnerships , 2001, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..