Impairment-Aware Control Plane Architectures to Handle Optical Networks of the Future

In transparent (and translucent) optical networks, physical layer impairments (PLIs) incurred by nonideal optical transmission media accumulate along an optical path, and the overall effect determines the feasibility of the lightpaths. If the received signal quality is not within the receiver sensitivity threshold, the receiver may not be able to correctly detect the optical signal, and this may result in high bit-error rates. Introducing optical transparency in the physical layer reduces the possibility of client layer interaction with the optical layer at intermediate nodes along the path. The standard GMPLS protocols used for dynamic establishment of lightpaths in transparent/translucent optical networks suffer from lack of PLI information and optical component characteristics. Hence, there is a strong need for development of techniques that provide PLI information to GMPLS protocols and mechanisms that use this information efficiently to evaluate optical feasibility of lightpaths. Without the development of such mechanisms, it would be impossible to automatically initiate a lightpath establishment from client layers, for example, switch or an IP router or a label switch router (LSR). In this chapter, various impairment-aware optical control plane (IA-OCP) approaches are described and compared, namely, signaling-based approach, routing-based approach, hybrid approach, and PCE-based approach. The properties of these control plane architectures are qualitatively studied. Furthermore, the performance study of two IA-OCP approaches is discussed through extensive simulation results.

[1]  Wataru Imajuku,et al.  Framework for GMPLS and PCE Control of Wavelength Switched Optical Networks (WSON) , 2011 .

[2]  P. Castoldi,et al.  A novel signaling approach to encompass physical impairments in GMPLS networks , 2004, IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference Workshops, 2004. GlobeCom Workshops 2004..

[3]  Luca Valcarenghi,et al.  Challenges and requirements for introducing impairment-awareness into the management and control planes of ASON/GMPLS WDM networks , 2006, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[4]  O. Gerstel,et al.  Effect of impairment modeling errors on reachability graph based lightpath setup in translucent optical networks , 2011, 15th International Conference on Optical Network Design and Modeling - ONDM 2011.

[5]  Giovanni Martinelli,et al.  GMPLS Signaling Extensions for Optical Impairment Aware Lightpath Setup , 2010 .

[6]  Elio Salvadori,et al.  Novel signalling based approach for handling linear and non-linear impairments in transparent optical networks , 2009, 2009 Sixth International Conference on Broadband Communications, Networks, and Systems.

[7]  Young Lee,et al.  A Framework for the Control of Wavelength Switched Optical Networks (WSONs) with Impairments , 2012, RFC.

[8]  Lou Berger,et al.  Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Signaling Resource ReserVation Protocol-Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE) Extensions , 2003, RFC.

[9]  P. Castoldi,et al.  Accounting for Shared Regenerators in GMPLS-Controlled Translucent Optical Networks , 2009, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[10]  Yabin Ye,et al.  Towards deployment of signalling based approaches for impairment aware lightpath setup in transparent WDM optical networks , 2008, 2008 34th European Conference on Optical Communication.

[11]  Luca Valcarenghi,et al.  Centralized vs. Distributed Approaches for Encompassing Physical Impairments in Transparent Optical Networks , 2007, ONDM.

[12]  Angela L. Chiu,et al.  Impairments and Other Constraints on Optical Layer Routing , 2005, RFC.

[13]  Elio Salvadori,et al.  A Study of Connection Management Approaches for an Impairment-Aware Optical Control Plane , 2007, ONDM.

[14]  Yabin Ye,et al.  Distributed Optical Control Plane Architectures for Handling Transmission Impairments in Transparent Optical Networks , 2009, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[15]  Chava Vijaya Saradhi,et al.  Physical layer impairment aware routing (PLIAR) in WDM optical networks: issues and challenges , 2009, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[16]  L Velasco,et al.  Experimental demonstration of centralized and distributed impairment-aware control plane schemes for dynamic transparent optical networks , 2010, 2010 Conference on Optical Fiber Communication (OFC/NFOEC), collocated National Fiber Optic Engineers Conference.

[17]  Dave Katz,et al.  Traffic Engineering (TE) Extensions to OSPF Version 2 , 2003, RFC.

[18]  P. Castoldi,et al.  Implementing a Path Computation Element (PCE) to encompass physical impairments in transparent networks , 2007, OFC/NFOEC 2007 - 2007 Conference on Optical Fiber Communication and the National Fiber Optic Engineers Conference.

[19]  R. Piesiewicz,et al.  Hybrid control plane architecture for dynamic impairment-aware routing in transparent optical networks , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Photonics in Switching.