Generalized Processing Tree Models: Jointly Modeling Discrete and Continuous Variables

Multinomial processing tree models assume that discrete cognitive states determine observed response frequencies. Generalized processing tree (GPT) models extend this conceptual framework to continuous variables such as response times, process-tracing measures, or neurophysiological variables. GPT models assume finite-mixture distributions, with weights determined by a processing tree structure, and continuous components modeled by parameterized distributions such as Gaussians with separate or shared parameters across states. We discuss identifiability, parameter estimation, model testing, a modeling syntax, and the improved precision of GPT estimates. Finally, a GPT version of the feature comparison model of semantic categorization is applied to computer-mouse trajectories.

[1]  Jeff Miller,et al.  A likelihood ratio test for mixture effects , 2006, Behavior research methods.

[2]  Gregory J. Koop,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition The Response Dynamics of Recognition Memory: Sensitivity and Bias , 2019 .

[3]  E. Wagenmakers,et al.  An Introduction to Model-Based Cognitive Neuroscience , 2015, Springer New York.

[4]  H. Teicher.  Identifiability of Mixtures of Product Measures , 1967 .

[5]  Felix Henninger,et al.  Mousetrap: An integrated, open-source mouse-tracking package , 2017, Behavior Research Methods.

[6]  G. Casella,et al.  Statistical Inference , 2003, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[7]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Response Times: Their Role in Inferring Elementary Mental Organization , 1986 .

[8]  Edgar Erdfelder,et al.  Extending multinomial processing tree models to measure the relative speed of cognitive processes , 2016, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[9]  Denny Borsboom,et al.  Cognitive psychology meets psychometric theory: on the relation between process models for decision making and latent variable models for individual differences. , 2011, Psychological review.

[10]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  OpenSesame: An open-source, graphical experiment builder for the social sciences , 2011, Behavior Research Methods.

[11]  Mikhail Nikulin,et al.  Chi-Squared Goodness of Fit Tests with Applications , 2013 .

[12]  David M. Riefer,et al.  Theoretical and empirical review of multinomial process tree modeling , 1999, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[13]  K. C. Klauer.  Hierarchical Multinomial Processing Tree Models: A Latent-Trait Approach , 2006 .

[14]  Timothy R. C. Read,et al.  Goodness-Of-Fit Statistics for Discrete Multivariate Data , 1988 .

[15]  Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al.  Evidence for discrete-state processing in recognition memory , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  Christopher Donkin,et al.  Discrete-slots models of visual working-memory response times. , 2013, Psychological review.

[17]  W. Batchelder.  Multinomial processing tree models and psychological assessment. , 1998 .

[18]  Mikhail Nikulin,et al.  On a Modification of the Standard Statistics of Pearson , 1975 .

[19]  Jeffrey N Rouder,et al.  The nature of psychological thresholds. , 2009, Psychological review.

[20]  S. Sloman.  The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. , 1996 .

[21]  E. Wagenmakers,et al.  Bayesian Estimation of Multinomial Processing Tree Models with Heterogeneity in Participants and Items , 2013, Psychometrika.

[22]  M. Nikulin,et al.  Chi-Square Test for Continuous Distributions with Shift and Scale Parameters , 1974 .

[23]  H. Chernoff,et al.  The Use of Maximum Likelihood Estimates in {\chi^2} Tests for Goodness of Fit , 1954 .

[24]  David M. Riefer,et al.  Multinomial processing models of source monitoring. , 1990 .

[25]  S. K. Srinivasan,et al.  Discrete State Models , 1977 .

[26]  D. Meyer,et al.  Analyses of multinomial mixture distributions: new tests for stochastic models of cognition and action. , 1991, Psychological bulletin.

[27]  Mark A. Pitt,et al.  Model Evaluation, Testing and Selection , 2005 .

[28]  Henrik Singmann,et al.  MPTinR: Analysis of multinomial processing tree models in R , 2013, Behavior research methods.

[29]  Jordan M. Province,et al.  Performance on Perceptual Word Identification is Mediated by Discrete States , 2015, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[30]  Francis Tuerlinckx,et al.  Two interpretations of the discrimination parameter , 2005 .

[31]  A. Bröder,et al.  Validating a two-high-threshold measurement model for confidence rating data in recognition , 2013, Memory.

[32]  David S. Moore,et al.  Unified Large-Sample Theory of General Chi-Squared Statistics for Tests of Fit , 1975 .

[33]  Morten Moshagen,et al.  multiTree: A computer program for the analysis of multinomial processing tree models , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[34]  Gregory E. Alexander,et al.  Discrete-state models: comment on Pazzaglia, Dube, and Rotello (2013). , 2013, Psychological bulletin.

[35]  Jonathan B Freeman,et al.  MouseTracker: Software for studying real-time mental processing using a computer mouse-tracking method , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[36]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  Beyond ROC curvature: Strength effects and response time data support continuous-evidence models of recognition memory. , 2012, Journal of memory and language.

[37]  Michael J. Spivey,et al.  Graded motor responses in the time course of categorizing atypical exemplars , 2007, Memory & cognition.

[38]  X Hu,et al.  Multinomial processing tree models: An implementation , 1999, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[39]  Karl Christoph Klauer,et al.  Model Testing and Selection, Theory of , 2001 .

[40]  W. Batchelder,et al.  The statistical analysis of general processing tree models with the EM algorithm , 1994 .

[41]  J. Behboodian.  Information matrix for a mixture of two normal distributions , 1972 .

[42]  Andrew Heathcote,et al.  The Lognormal Race: A Cognitive-Process Model of Choice and Latency with Desirable Psychometric Properties , 2015, Psychometrika.

[43]  D. Rubin,et al.  Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM - algorithm plus discussions on the paper , 1977 .

[44]  Edgar Erdfelder,et al.  Explaining individual differences in cognitive processes underlying hindsight bias , 2015, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[45]  R. Ollman.  Fast guesses in choice reaction time , 1966 .

[46]  A. Bröder,et al.  Recognition ROCs are curvilinear-or are they? On premature arguments against the two-high-threshold model of recognition. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[47]  Jochen Ranger,et al.  A Race Model for Responses and Response Times in Tests , 2015, Psychometrika.

[48]  Rick Dale,et al.  Assessing bimodality to detect the presence of a dual cognitive process , 2013, Behavior research methods.

[49]  Stephen E. Fienberg,et al.  Cognitive psychology meets the national survey. , 1985 .

[50]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 1994 .

[51]  E. Wagenmakers,et al.  AIC model selection using Akaike weights , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[52]  Sylvia Frühwirth-Schnatter,et al.  Finite Mixture and Markov Switching Models , 2006 .

[53]  K C Rao,et al.  A chi-squabe statistic for goodies-of-fit tests within the exponential family , 1974 .

[54]  E. Erdfelder,et al.  Linking Process and Measurement Models of Recognition-Based Decisions , 2017, Psychological review.

[55]  Lance J. Rips,et al.  Structure and process in semantic memory: A featural model for semantic decisions. , 1974 .

[56]  S. Yakowitz,et al.  On the Identifiability of Finite Mixtures , 1968 .

[57]  Edgar Erdfelder,et al.  Individual differences in use of the recognition heuristic are stable across time, choice objects, domains, and presentation formats , 2015, Memory & Cognition.

[58]  B. Hilbig,et al.  Multinomial processing tree models: A review of the literature. , 2009 .

[59]  Daniel W. Heck,et al.  TreeBUGS: An R package for hierarchical multinomial-processing-tree modeling , 2017, Behavior Research Methods.

[60]  T. Zandt,et al.  How to fit a response time distribution , 2000, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[61]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: applications to dementia and amnesia. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. General.