Lessons Learned from Implementation of an Interferon Gamma Release Assay to Screen for Latent Tuberculosis Infection in a Large Multicenter Observational Cohort Study in Brazil

The IGRA has emerged as a useful tool for identifying persons with LTBI. Although the implementation of IGRAs is of utmost importance, to our knowledge there is scarce information on the identification of logistical and technical challenges for systematic screening for LTBI on a large scale. ABSTRACT The interferon gamma release assay (IGRA) has emerged as a useful tool for identifying latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI). This assay can be performed through testing platforms such as the QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) assay. This in vitro test has been incorporated into several guidelines worldwide and has recently been considered by the World Health Organization (WHO) for the diagnosis of LTBI. The possibility of systematically implementing IGRAs such as the QFT-Plus assay in centers that perform LTBI screening has been accelerated by the decreased availability of the tuberculin skin test (TST) in several countries. Nevertheless, the process to implement IGRA testing in routine clinical care has many gaps. The study utilized the expertise acquired by the laboratory teams of the Regional Prospective Observational Research in Tuberculosis (RePORT)-Brazil consortium during study protocol implementation of LTBI screening of tuberculosis (TB) close contacts. RePORT-Brazil includes clinical research sites from Brazilian cities and is the largest multicenter cohort of TB close contacts in the country to date. Operational and logistical challenges faced during IGRA implementation in all study laboratories are described, as well as the solutions that were developed and led to the successful establishment of IGRA testing in RePORT-Brazil. The descriptions of the problems identified and resolved in this study can assist laboratories implementing IGRAs, in addition to manufacturers of IGRAs providing effective technical support. This will facilitate the implementation of IGRA testing in countries with large TB burdens, such as Brazil. IMPORTANCE The IGRA has emerged as a useful tool for identifying persons with LTBI. Although the implementation of IGRAs is of utmost importance, to our knowledge there is scarce information on the identification of logistical and technical challenges for systematic screening for LTBI on a large scale. Thus, the descriptions of the problems identified and resolved in this study can assist laboratories implementing IGRAs, in addition to manufacturers of IGRAs providing effective technical support. This will facilitate the implementation of IGRA testing in countries with large TB burdens, such as Brazil.

[1]  T. Sterling,et al.  Novel stepwise approach to assess representativeness of a large multicenter observational cohort of tuberculosis patients: The example of RePORT Brazil , 2020, International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases.

[2]  I. Sia,et al.  Comparison of the QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus and QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube Interferon Gamma Release Assays in Patients at Risk for Tuberculosis and in Health Care Workers , 2018, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[3]  M. Behr,et al.  Latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection and Interferon-Gamma Release Assays. , 2016, Microbiology spectrum.

[4]  Peter J Dodd,et al.  The Global Burden of Latent Tuberculosis Infection: A Re-estimation Using Mathematical Modelling , 2016, PLoS medicine.

[5]  A. Benedetti,et al.  Reproducibility of interferon gamma (IFN-γ) release Assays. A systematic review. , 2014, Annals of the American Thoracic Society.

[6]  Nancy A. Dreyer,et al.  Interfacing Registries With Electronic Health Records , 2014 .

[7]  M. Pai,et al.  Impact of Blood Volume, Tube Shaking, and Incubation Time on Reproducibility of QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube Assay , 2013, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[8]  G. Mazurek,et al.  Within-Subject Interlaboratory Variability of QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube Tests , 2012, PloS one.

[9]  G. Mazurek,et al.  Affect Of Blood Collection Time On QuantiFERON®-TB Gold In-Tube Test Variability , 2012, ATS 2012.

[10]  R. Gaur,et al.  Preanalytical Delay Reduces Sensitivity of QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube Assay for Detection of Latent Tuberculosis Infection , 2011, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[11]  A. Lalvani,et al.  Interferon gamma release assays: principles and practice. , 2010, Enfermedades infecciosas y microbiologia clinica.

[12]  M. D. I. Brasil Manual de Recomendações para o Controle da Tuberculose no Brasil , 2010 .

[13]  P. Hopewell,et al.  Tuberculosis and latent tuberculosis infection in close contacts of people with pulmonary tuberculosis in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2008, The Lancet. Infectious diseases.

[14]  M. Pai,et al.  False-positive tuberculin skin tests: what is the absolute effect of BCG and non-tuberculous mycobacteria? , 2006, The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease.

[15]  L. Fabbri,et al.  Routine hospital use of a new commercial whole blood interferon-gamma assay for the diagnosis of tuberculosis infection. , 2005, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[16]  R. Horsburgh,et al.  Priorities for the treatment of latent tuberculosis infection in the United States. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  Callum G. Fraser,et al.  Biological Variation: From Principles to Practice , 2001 .

[18]  P. Andersen,et al.  Specific immune-based diagnosis of tuberculosis , 2000, The Lancet.