The paper presents a bibliometric analysis of the 4821 cited documents appended to the 295 articles published in DJLIT during 2011-15. The citation analysis is based on various strictures such as studying distribution of citations, authorship pattern, degree of collaboration, distribution of reference sources, prominent authors and ranked list of core journals. The study revealed that there is dominance of single authorship with 1912 (39.65%) citations followed by two authors with 1152 (23.89%) citations, three authors with 456 (9.45%) citations and more than three authors with 386 (8%) citations. There has been the availability of a good degree of institutional publications as well. Year-wise authorship pattern is also specified so as to see the dominance of particular authorship pattern for the period considered under the study. The degree of authors’ collaboration for the present study is 0.51 and modified collaborative coefficient is 0.3661. Dr B.M. Gupta with 52 citations is the most prolific author. Dr K.C. Garg and Dr B.S. Kademani are at the second and third position respectively. The study further exposed the journal to be the mostly cited information source 2560 (53.10%) followed by websites (22.69%) and books (10.81%). Conference papers, reports, theses, workshop papers and seminar papers equally seem to be preferred domain with regard to using pertinent information source. Ranked list of journals denotes Scientometrics to be the most used journal (6.60%) by the authors contributing in DJLIT. The source journal is at the second position in the ranked list with 5.43%. A glance at the ranked core list of journals suggests that maximum journals are from foreign countries.
[1]
K. Subramanyam,et al.
Bibliometric studies of research collaboration: A review
,
1983
.
[2]
E. Garfield.
Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation.
,
1972,
Science.
[3]
Swapan Kumar Patra,et al.
Google Scholar-based citation analysis of Indian library and information science journals
,
2014
.
[4]
Plergiorgio Strata,et al.
Citation analysis
,
1995,
Nature.
[5]
Bebi,et al.
Citation Analysis of PhD Theses in Sociology Submitted to University of Delhi during 1995-2010
,
2013
.
[6]
Har Singh.
Citation analysis of Collection Building during 2005‐2012
,
2013
.
[7]
S. Thanuskodi.
Bibliometric Analysis of DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology
,
2012
.
[8]
R. Srikanth,et al.
Modified collaborative coefficient: a new measure for quantifying the degree of research collaboration
,
2010,
Scientometrics.
[9]
P. Deshmukh.
Citations in Annals of Library and Information Studies during 1997 to 2010:A study
,
2011
.
[10]
Rosy Jan,et al.
Citation analysis of Library Trends
,
2009,
Webology.