Early Relay Intercropping of Short-Season Cotton Increases Lint Yield and Earliness by Improving the Yield Components and Boll Distribution under Wheat-Cotton Double Cropping

Wheat-cotton double cropping has improved crop productivity and economic benefits per unit land area in many countries, including China. However, relay intercropping of full-season cotton and wheat, the most commonly adopted mode, is labor-intensive and unconducive to mechanization. The direct sowing of short-season cotton after wheat (CAW) has been successful, but cotton yields and economic benefits are greatly reduced. Whether the relay intercropping of short-season cotton before the wheat harvest increases cotton yields remains unclear, as does the earliness and fiber quality relative to those for CAW. Therefore, we directly planted short-season cotton after wheat harvest on 15 June (CAW) as the control and interplanted short-season cotton in wheat on 15 May (S1), 25 May (S2) and 5 June (S3), which were 30, 20 and 10 days prior to wheat harvest, respectively, from 2016 to 2018. The crop growth, yield, yield components, boll distribution, and earliness of the cotton were evaluated. The yields and earliness of short-season cotton under relay intercropping were 26.7–30.6% and 20.4–42.9% higher than those under CAW, respectively. Compared with CAW, relay intercropping treatments increased the boll density, boll weight and lint percentage by 5.6–13.1%, 12.5–24.5% and 5.8–12.7%, respectively. The dry matter accumulation and harvest index under the relay intercropping treatments were also greater than those under CAW, which might be attributed to the greater partitioning of dry matter to the seed cotton than to the boll shells. Among the relay intercropping treatments (S1, S2 and S3), the lint yield did not differ, but S1 and S2 were considerably better than S3 based on earliness and fiber quality. The analysis of the within-plant spatial boll distribution showed that more bolls were formed on the lower to middle fruiting branches and at the first fruiting sites for S1 and S2 than for S3 and CAW. Therefore, the increased earliness and fiber quality induced through early relay intercropping (S1 and S2) could be attributed to an improved spatial boll distribution compared to late relay intercropping (S3) or CAW. Conclusively, compared to late relay intercropping and CAW, early relay intercropping considerably increased the lint yield, fiber quality, and earliness by improving the yield components, boll distribution, and dry matter accumulation and partitioning. The relay intercropping of short-season cotton 20 to 30 days before wheat harvest represents a promising alternative to CAW in wheat-cotton double-cropping systems in the Yellow River Basin of China and other regions with similar conditions.

[1]  J. Shang,et al.  Allocative efficiency analysis of wheat and cotton in district Khanewal, Punjab, Pakistan , 2020 .

[2]  X. Zhang,et al.  Architecture of stem and branch affects yield formation in short season cotton , 2020 .

[3]  Yabing Li,et al.  One-time fertilization at first flowering improves lint yield and dry matter partitioning in late planted short-season cotton , 2020 .

[4]  O. Choudhary,et al.  Sub-soiling improves productivity and economic returns of cotton-wheat cropping system , 2019, Soil and Tillage Research.

[5]  Zhanbiao Wang,et al.  How do cotton light interception and carbohydrate partitioning respond to cropping systems including monoculture, intercropping with wheat, and direct-seeding after wheat? , 2019, PloS one.

[6]  W. Cao,et al.  Effects of planting pattern on growth and yield and economic benefits of cotton in a wheat-cotton double cropping system versus monoculture cotton , 2017 .

[7]  D. Tan,et al.  Planting density and sowing date strongly influence growth and lint yield of cotton crops , 2017 .

[8]  Wenqing Zhao,et al.  The effects of sowing date on cottonseed properties at different fruiting-branch positions , 2017 .

[9]  Christopher L. Main,et al.  Cotton Maturity Determination through Vertical Mapping , 2017 .

[10]  Wei Tang,et al.  Yield and economic benefits of late planted short-season cotton versus full-season cotton relayed with garlic , 2017 .

[11]  S. Anjum,et al.  Relay cropping of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) improves the profitability of cotton-wheat cropping system in Punjab, Pakistan , 2017, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[12]  X. Tian,et al.  Effect of planting date and plant density on cotton traits as relating to mechanical harvesting in the Yellow River valley region of China , 2016 .

[13]  D. Oosterhuis,et al.  Effect of late planting and shading on cotton yield and fiber quality formation , 2015 .

[14]  Zhiguo Zhou,et al.  Effect of cropping system on radiation use efficiency in double-cropped wheat–cotton , 2015 .

[15]  P. Aggarwal,et al.  Conservation agriculture in an irrigated cotton–wheat system of the western Indo-Gangetic Plains: Crop and water productivity and economic profitability , 2014, Field Crops Research.

[16]  Dong He-zhon,et al.  On Boll-Setting Optimization Theory for Cotton Cultivation and Its New Development , 2014 .

[17]  D. Oosterhuis,et al.  Changes of sucrose metabolism in leaf subtending to cotton boll under cool temperature due to late planting , 2013 .

[18]  B. Hau,et al.  Short-season cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) may be a suitable response to late planting in sub-Saharan regions , 2011 .

[19]  Zhou Zhi-guo.  Effects of Fruiting-Branch Position,Temperature-Light Factors and Nitrogen Rates on Cotton(Gossypium hirsutum L.) Fiber Strength Formation , 2011 .

[20]  Z. Wen.  Effects of Fruiting Branch Position,Temperature-light Factors and Nitrogen Rates on Cotton(Gossypium hirsutum L.)Fiber Elongation , 2011 .

[21]  Zhao Xin.  Effects of Sowing Date on Accumulation and Distribution of Biomass and Nitrogen in Cotton Bolls , 2010 .

[22]  Wei Tang,et al.  Late Planting of Short-Season Cotton in Saline Fields of the Yellow River Delta , 2010 .

[23]  Glen L. Ritchie,et al.  Subsurface Drip and Overhead Irrigation: A Comparison of Plant Boll Distribution in Upland Cotton , 2009 .

[24]  E. L. Clawson,et al.  Cotton Planting Date: Yield, Seedling Survival, and Plant Growth , 2009 .

[25]  W. Pettigrew,et al.  Impact of Varying Planting Dates and Tillage Systems on Cotton Growth and Lint Yield Production , 2009 .

[26]  Michel Fok,et al.  Modeling boll maturation period, seed growth, protein, and oil content of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) in China , 2009 .

[27]  S. S. Ray,et al.  Effects of sowing date, tillage and residue management on productivity of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)–wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) system in northwest India , 2008 .

[28]  W. Werf,et al.  Temperature-mediated developmental delay may limit yield of cotton in relay intercrops with wheat , 2008 .

[29]  W. Werf,et al.  Growth, yield and quality of wheat and cotton in relay strip intercropping systems , 2007 .

[30]  Wei Tang,et al.  Yield, quality and leaf senescence of cotton grown at varying planting dates and plant densities in the Yellow River Valley of China , 2006 .

[31]  Y. Bolek,et al.  Timing of planting is crucial for cotton yield , 2006 .

[32]  R. Nichols,et al.  Phenological and Morphological Components of Cotton Crop Maturity , 2005 .

[33]  M. Bange,et al.  Growth and dry matter partitioning of diverse cotton genotypes , 2004 .

[34]  E. B. Moser,et al.  Boll retention and boll size among intrasympodial fruiting sites in cotton , 2003 .

[35]  R. W. Willey,et al.  Evaluation and Presentation of Intercropping Advantages , 1985, Experimental Agriculture.