Boys' Advantage on the Fractions Number Line is Mediated by Visuospatial Attention: Evidence for a Parietal-Spatial Contribution to Number Line Learning.

The study tested the hypotheses that boys will have an advantage learning the fractions number line and this advantage will be mediated by spatial abilities. Fractions number line and, as a contrast, fractions arithmetic performance was assessed for 342 adolescents, as was their intelligence, working memory, and various spatial abilities. Boys showed smaller placement errors on the fractions number line (d = -0.22) and correctly solved more fractions arithmetic problems (d = 0.23) than girls. Working memory and intelligence predicted performance on both fractions measures, and a measure of visuospatial attention uniquely predicted number line performance and fully mediated the sex difference. Visuospatial working memory uniquely predicted fractions arithmetic performance and fully mediated the sex difference. The results help to clarify the nuanced relations between spatial abilities and formal mathematics learning and the sex differences that often emerge in mathematical domains that have a visuospatial component.

[1]  D. Geary.  Male, female: The evolution of human sex differences (3rd ed.). , 2021 .

[2]  Clarissa A. Thompson,et al.  Gender differences in confidence during number-line estimation , 2020 .

[3]  Christopher Summerfield,et al.  Structure learning and the posterior parietal cortex , 2020, Progress in Neurobiology.

[4]  Stella F. Lourenco,et al.  The development of gender differences in spatial reasoning: A meta-analytic review. , 2019, Psychological bulletin.

[5]  David W. Braithwaite,et al.  Individual differences in fraction arithmetic learning , 2019, Cognitive Psychology.

[6]  Yiyun Zhang,et al.  Visual form perception supports approximate number system acuity and arithmetic fluency , 2019, Learning and Individual Differences.

[7]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design: 20 Years Later , 2019, Educational Psychology Review.

[8]  Michael S. C. Thomas,et al.  The developmental relations between spatial cognition and mathematics in primary school children. , 2018, Developmental science.

[9]  Ian M. Lyons,et al.  More Similar Than Different: Gender Differences in Children's Basic Numerical Skills Are the Exception Not the Rule. , 2019, Child development.

[10]  J. Opfer,et al.  Dynamics and development in number-to-space mapping , 2018, Cognitive Psychology.

[11]  Amanda H. Waterman,et al.  Hitting the Target: Mathematical Attainment in Children Is Related to Interceptive-Timing Ability , 2018, Psychological science.

[12]  Melissa E. Libertus,et al.  No intrinsic gender differences in children’s earliest numerical abilities , 2018, npj Science of Learning.

[13]  David W. Braithwaite,et al.  Do children understand fraction addition? , 2018, Developmental science.

[14]  Matthew C. Makel,et al.  Sex differences in ability tilt in the right tail of cognitive abilities: A 35-year examination , 2018 .

[15]  R. Siegler,et al.  Hard Lessons: Why Rational Number Arithmetic Is So Difficult for So Many People , 2017 .

[16]  D. Geary,et al.  Developmental Change in the Influence of Domain-General Abilities and Domain-Specific Knowledge on Mathematics Achievement: An Eight-Year Longitudinal Study , 2017, Journal of educational psychology.

[17]  Susan D. Voyer,et al.  Sex differences in visual-spatial working memory: A meta-analysis , 2016, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[18]  Dénes Szűcs,et al.  A critical analysis of design, facts, bias and inference in the approximate number system training literature: A systematic review , 2017, Trends in Neuroscience and Education.

[19]  D. Geary,et al.  Children’s visuospatial memory predicts mathematics achievement through early adolescence , 2017, PloS one.

[20]  Emily Szkudlarek,et al.  Does the Approximate Number System Serve as a Foundation for Symbolic Mathematics? , 2017, Language learning and development : the official journal of the Society for Language Development.

[21]  David W. Braithwaite,et al.  Numerical Development , 2017, Annual review of psychology.

[22]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  On the origins of logarithmic number-to-position mapping. , 2016, Psychological review.

[23]  R. Bull,et al.  Developmental Changes in Working Memory, Updating, and Math Achievement. , 2016 .

[24]  M. Barnes,et al.  A meta-analysis of mathematics and working memory: Moderating effects of working memory domain, type of mathematics skill, and sample characteristics , 2016 .

[25]  Jacqueline Leybaert,et al.  How approximate and exact number skills are related to each other across development : A review , 2016 .

[26]  Lisa K. Fazio,et al.  Strategy use and strategy choice in fraction magnitude comparison. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[27]  Percival G. Matthews,et al.  Neurocognitive Architectures and the Nonsymbolic Foundations of Fractions Understanding , 2016 .

[28]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Neuronal substrates of Corsi Block span: Lesion symptom mapping analyses in relation to attentional competition and spatial bias , 2014, Neuropsychologia.

[29]  David Barner,et al.  Inference and association in children's early numerical estimation. , 2014, Child development.

[30]  Jeffrey N Rouder,et al.  Children's cognitive representation of the mathematical number line. , 2014, Developmental science.

[31]  D. Burr,et al.  Compressive mapping of number to space reflects dynamic encoding mechanisms, not static logarithmic transform , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory: A Broader View on the Role of Memory in Learning and Education , 2014, Educational Psychology Review.

[33]  Rebecca Bull,et al.  Executive Functioning and Mathematics Achievement , 2014 .

[34]  J. H. Steiger,et al.  Creativity and Technical Innovation , 2013, Psychological science.

[35]  Alexandra A. Cleland,et al.  Sex differences in the spatial representation of number. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[36]  H. Barth,et al.  Developmental change in numerical estimation. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[37]  Yves Rosseel,et al.  lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling , 2012 .

[38]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  Human Neuroscience Original Research Article Neglect Impairs Explicit Processing of the Mental Number Line , 2022 .

[39]  J. G. McCoy,et al.  Sex differences on the judgment of line orientation task: A function of landmark presence and hormonal status , 2012, Physiology & Behavior.

[40]  Timothy Koscik,et al.  Sex differences in parietal lobe structure and development. , 2012, Gender medicine.

[41]  Clarissa A. Thompson,et al.  An integrated theory of whole number and fractions development , 2011, Cognitive Psychology.

[42]  D. Cohen,et al.  Numerical bias in bounded and unbounded number line tasks , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[43]  Hilary C Barth,et al.  The development of numerical estimation: evidence against a representational shift. , 2011, Developmental science.

[44]  Susanne M. Jaeggi,et al.  The Relationship between N-Back Performance and Matrix Reasoning--Implications for Training and Transfer. , 2010 .

[45]  V. Walsh,et al.  The parietal cortex and the representation of time, space, number and other magnitudes , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[46]  Nancy C. Andreasen,et al.  Sex differences in parietal lobe morphology: Relationship to mental rotation performance , 2009, Brain and Cognition.

[47]  H. Damasio,et al.  Neuroanatomical correlates of the Benton Facial Recognition Test and Judgment of Line Orientation Test , 2009, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[48]  David C. Geary,et al.  An Evolutionarily Informed Education Science , 2008 .

[49]  John E. Opfer,et al.  Representational change and magnitude estimation: Why young children can make more accurate salary comparisons than adults , 2008, Cognition.

[50]  Clarissa A. Thompson,et al.  Costs and benefits of representational change: effects of context on age and sex differences in symbolic magnitude estimation. , 2008, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[51]  Pierre Pica,et al.  Log or Linear? Distinct Intuitions of the Number Scale in Western and Amazonian Indigene Cultures , 2008, Science.

[52]  Stella F. Lourenco,et al.  Spatial attention and the mental number line: Evidence for characteristic biases and compression , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[53]  D. Geary,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST The Science of Sex Differences in Science and Mathematics , 2022 .

[54]  David Lubinski,et al.  Spatial Ability: A Neglected Dimension In Talent Searches For Intellectually Precocious Youth , 2007 .

[55]  Stian Reimers,et al.  Visuospatial Performance on an Internet Line Judgment Task and Potential Hormonal Markers: Sex, Sexual Orientation, and 2D:4D , 2007, Archives of sexual behavior.

[56]  Silke M. Göbel,et al.  Parietal rTMS distorts the mental number line: Simulating ‘spatial’ neglect in healthy subjects , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[57]  D. Lubinski,et al.  Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth After 35 Years: Uncovering Antecedents for the Development of Math-Science Expertise , 2006, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[58]  Stella F. Lourenco,et al.  Socioeconomic Status Modifies the Sex Difference in Spatial Skill , 2005, Psychological science.

[59]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Interactions between number and space in parietal cortex , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[60]  David C. Geary,et al.  The Origin of Mind: Evolution of Brain, Cognition, and General Intelligence , 2004 .

[61]  E. Spelke,et al.  Language and Conceptual Development series Core systems of number , 2004 .

[62]  Vincent Walsh.  A theory of magnitude: common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[63]  R. Siegler,et al.  The Development of Numerical Estimation , 2003, Psychological science.

[64]  M. L. Collaer,et al.  Large Visuospatial Sex Difference in Line Judgment: Possible Role of Attentional Factors , 2002, Brain and Cognition.

[65]  K. Priftis,et al.  Brain damage: Neglect disrupts the mental number line , 2002, Nature.

[66]  Mary K. Hoard,et al.  Sex differences in spatial cognition, computational fluency, and arithmetical reasoning. , 2000, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[67]  B. Turetsky,et al.  An fMRI Study of Sex Differences in Regional Activation to a Verbal and a Spatial Task , 2000, Brain and Language.

[68]  C. Gallistel,et al.  Non-verbal numerical cognition: from reals to integers , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[69]  M. Just,et al.  Graded Functional Activation in the Visuospatial System with the Amount of Task Demand , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[70]  M. Casey,et al.  Mediators of gender differences in mathematics college entrance test scores: a comparison of spatial skills with internalized beliefs and anxieties. , 1997, Developmental psychology.

[71]  C. Junqué,et al.  Right Hemisphere Dysfunction in Subjects With Attention-Deficit Disorder With and Without Hyperactivity , 1997, Journal of child neurology.

[72]  R. Case,et al.  Introduction: reconceptualizing the nature of children's conceptual structures and their development in middle childhood. , 2008, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.

[73]  David C. Geary,et al.  Sexual selection and sex differences in mathematical abilities , 1996, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[74]  David C. Geary,et al.  Children's Mathematical Development: Research and Practical Applications , 1996 .

[75]  M. Peters,et al.  A Redrawn Vandenberg and Kuse Mental Rotations Test - Different Versions and Factors That Affect Performance , 1995, Brain and Cognition.

[76]  Susan D. Voyer,et al.  Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: a meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[77]  David C. Geary,et al.  Reflections of evolution and culture in children's cognition: Implications for mathematical development and instruction. , 1995 .

[78]  A. Raftery.  Bayesian Model Selection in Social Research , 1995 .

[79]  E. Fennema,et al.  Gender differences in mathematics performance: a meta-analysis. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[80]  A. Lewis.  Training students to represent arithmetic word problems , 1989 .

[81]  S. Marshall,et al.  Sex differences in learning mathematics: A longitudinal study with item and error analyses. , 1987 .

[82]  Edward S. Johnson.  Sex differences in problem solving. , 1984 .

[83]  A. Benton,et al.  Visuospatial judgment. A clinical test. , 1978, Archives of neurology.

[84]  R. Cattell.  Theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence: A critical experiment. , 1963 .