Impact of mass balance calculations on adsorption capacities in microporous shale gas reservoirs

Abstract Determination of the adsorbed reservoir capacity of gas shales by adsorption analyses as done routinely by mass balance maybe in significant error if the effects of pore-size dependent void volume (porosity) is not considered. It is shown here that with increasing pressure, helium, which is invariably used to measure void volume, can access pores that are not available for adsorption to gases with larger kinetic diameters as highlighted by experiments with zeolites of known pore-size distribution. Helium can diffuse and/or adsorb in restricted pores of the microporous samples, as indicated by a larger void volume with pressure. The error in adsorption calculations due to helium void volume calibrations for high pressure methane isotherms is most significant with low organic-carbon content, moisture-equilibrated shales and mudrocks in which the overall adsorptive capacity is low. In such samples negative adsorption can be calculated due to the void volume of helium used in the mass balance calculations exceeding the void volume to methane – a reflection of greater pore-space accessibility of the smaller helium molecule than methane. The amount of the error introduced by using helium void volume in mass balance calculations is pore-size and pore-size distribution dependent. Organic-rich shales and mudrocks or coals which do not show negative methane adsorption also maybe in error but the error is masked by their larger adsorbed gas capacities. Such findings underline the importance of analysis gas-type as kinetic diameter size will influence the penetrability/diffusion of the gas through the sample and hence the calculated adsorbed gas capacities.

[1]  T. J. Pratt,et al.  Measurement and Evaluation of Coal Sorption Isotherm Data , 1990 .

[2]  D. H. Everett,et al.  Adsorption of Gases on Heterogeneous Surfaces , 1992 .

[3]  K. Sing.  Reporting physisorption data for gas/solid systems with special reference to the determination of surface area and porosity (Recommendations 1984) , 1985 .

[4]  Ming Li,et al.  Supercritical Methane Adsorption Equilibrium Data on Activated Carbon with Prediction by the Adsorption Potential Theory , 2004 .

[5]  R. Marc Bustin,et al.  Selective transport of CO2, CH4, and N2 in coals: insights from modeling of experimental gas adsorption data , 2004 .

[6]  E. Wu,et al.  Physisorption of hydrogen in A, X and ZSM-5 types of zeolites at moderately high pressures , 2006 .

[7]  R. Aringhieri.  Nanoporosity Characteristics of Some Natural Clay Minerals and Soils , 2004 .

[8]  V. Gubanov,et al.  Interaction of gases with solid surfaces , 1988 .

[9]  Y. Gensterblum,et al.  High-pressure methane and carbon dioxide adsorption on dry and moisture-equilibrated Pennsylvanian coals , 2002 .

[10]  R. Bustin,et al.  Shale Gas Potential of the Lower Jurassic Gordondale Member, Northeastern British Columbia, Canada , 2007 .

[11]  H. Marsh.  Adsorption methods to study microporosity in coals and carbons—a critique , 1987 .

[12]  M. Polanyi,et al.  Section III.—Theories of the adsorption of gases. A general survey and some additional remarks. Introductory paper to section III , 1932 .

[13]  S. Sircar.  Excess properties and column dynamics of multicomponent gas adsorption , 1985 .

[14]  H. Kita,et al.  Preparation and gas separation performance of zeolite T membrane , 2004 .

[15]  P. Hall,et al.  Pore Structure of the Argonne Premium Coals , 1995 .

[16]  J. W. Gibbs,et al.  Scientific Papers , 2002, Molecular Imaging and Biology.

[17]  S. Patz,et al.  Pulsed-field-gradient measurements of time-dependent gas diffusion. , 1998, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[18]  L. Aylmore,et al.  THE MICROPORE SIZE DISTRIBUTIONS OF CLAY MINERAL SYSTEMS , 1967 .

[19]  Alírio E. Rodrigues,et al.  Adsorption Equilibrium of Methane, Carbon Dioxide, and Nitrogen on Zeolite 13X at High Pressures , 2004 .

[20]  R. Marc Bustin,et al.  The organic matter distribution and methane capacity of the Lower Cretaceous strata of Northeastern British Columbia, Canada , 2007 .

[21]  S. Hyun,et al.  Equilibrium adsorption of ethane, ethylene, isobutane, carbon dioxide, and their binary mixtures on 13X molecular sieves , 1982 .

[22]  A. Richardson,et al.  A Critique of , 2009 .

[23]  O. Talu,et al.  Gibbs Dividing Surface and Helium Adsorption , 2003 .

[24]  Philip L. Walker,et al.  Nature of the porosity in American coals , 1972 .

[25]  E. Teller,et al.  On a Theory of the van der Waals Adsorption of Gases , 1940 .

[26]  K. Sing,et al.  Adsorption by Powders and Porous Solids: Principles, Methodology and Applications , 1998 .

[27]  Y. Grillet,et al.  Thermochemical studies of adsorption of He and CO2 on coals at ambient temperature , 1989 .

[28]  V. A. Astakhov,et al.  Description of Adsorption Equilibria of Vapors on Zeolites over Wide Ranges of Temperature and Pressure , 1971 .

[29]  Walter J. Murphy,et al.  ADVANCES IN CHEMISTRY SERIES: Numbers 15 and 17 Demonstrate Rapidly Crowing Interest in Documentation; International Conference To Be Held in 1958 , 1956 .

[30]  R. Chahine,et al.  Adsorbent Helium Density Measurement and Its Effect on Adsorption Isotherms at High Pressure , 1997 .

[31]  Paul S. Schafer,et al.  A guide to coalbed methane reservoir engineering , 1996 .

[32]  K. Sing,et al.  Reporting physisorption data for gas/solid systems with special reference to the determination of surface area and porosity (Provisional) , 1982 .

[33]  M. Blank.  Progress in surface and membrane science , 1974 .

[34]  J. Vermesse,et al.  Gas Adsorption on Zeolites at High Pressure , 1996 .

[35]  D. Peng,et al.  A New Two-Constant Equation of State , 1976 .

[36]  A. Neimark,et al.  Calibration of Pore Volume in Adsorption Experiments and Theoretical Models , 1997 .

[37]  I. Langmuir.  THE ADSORPTION OF GASES ON PLANE SURFACES OF GLASS, MICA AND PLATINUM. , 1918 .

[38]  F. Tezel,et al.  Adsorption of nitrogen, methane, carbon monoxide, and their binary mixtures on aluminophosphate molecular sieves , 1997 .