Finite element simulation of quench distortion in a low-alloy steel incorporating transformation kinetics

Abstract The uncontrolled distortion of steel parts has been a long-standing and serious problem for heat treatment processes, especially quenching. To get a better understanding of distortion, the relationship between transformation kinetics and associated distortion has been investigated using a low-alloy chromium steel. Because martensite is a major phase transformed during the quenching of steel parts and is influential in the distortion, a new martensite start ( M s ) temperature and a martensite kinetics equation are proposed. Oil quenching experiments with an asymmetrically cut cylinder were conducted to confirm the effect of phase transformations on distortion. ABAQUS and its user-defined subroutines UMAT and UMATHT were used for finite element method (FEM) analysis. The predictions of the FEM simulation compare well with the measured data. The simulation results allow for a clear understanding of the relationship between the transformation kinetics and distortion.

[1]  Modeling and experimental verification of martensitic transformation plastic behavior in carbon steel for quenching process , 2006 .

[2]  J. Miettinen.  Calculation of solidification-related thermophysical properties for steels , 1997 .

[3]  Sung-Su Kang,et al.  A study on the mechanical properties for developing a computer simulation model for heat treatment process , 2007 .

[4]  G. Beck,et al.  Stress–phase-transformation interactions – basic principles, modelling, and calculation of internal stresses , 1985 .

[5]  M. Lusk,et al.  Conversional model of transformation strain to phase fraction in low alloy steels , 2007 .

[6]  J. Guimarães,et al.  A metallographic study of the influence of the austenite grain size on martensite kinetics , 1978 .

[7]  C. Liu,et al.  A new empirical formula for the calculation of MS temperatures in pure iron and super-low carbon alloy steels , 2001 .

[8]  Francisca García Caballero,et al.  Determination of Ms Temperature in Steels: A Bayesian Neural Network Model , 2002 .

[9]  J. Kunze,et al.  Thermodynamical calculation of martensite start temperatures in the system FeCrMnNiC , 2000 .

[10]  S. Sjöström,et al.  Coupled temperature, stress, phase transformation calculation , 1987, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A.

[11]  Zhi-gang Wang,et al.  Coupling between stress, temperature, and metallic structures during processes involving phase transformations , 1985 .

[12]  M. Umemoto,et al.  Effects of austenitizing temperature and austenite grain size on the formation of athermal martensite in an iron-nickel and an iron-nickel-carbon alloy , 1974, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B.

[13]  M. Chaturvedi,et al.  Phase Transformation in Materials , 1991 .

[14]  D. P. Koistinen,et al.  A general equation prescribing the extent of the austenite-martensite transformation in pure iron-carbon alloys and plain carbon steels , 1959 .

[15]  Douglas V. Doane,et al.  Hardenability concepts with applications to steel , 1978 .

[16]  K. Lee.  Characteristics of heat generation during transformation in carbon steels , 1999 .

[17]  A. Marder,et al.  Phase transformations in ferrous alloys , 1983 .

[18]  Yigil Cho,et al.  A Finite Element Model for Heat Treatment of Steel Alloy , 2006 .