The impact of suboptimal bowel preparation on adenoma miss rates and the factors associated with early repeat colonoscopy.

BACKGROUND There are no guidelines for the recommended interval to the next examination after colonoscopy with suboptimal bowel preparation. OBJECTIVE To identify factors associated with early repeat colonoscopy after initial examinations with suboptimal preparations and to measure adenoma miss rates in this context. DESIGN Retrospective study. SETTING Hospital-based endoscopy unit. PATIENTS Bowel preparation quality was recorded in 12,787 patients. RESULTS Of 12,787 colonoscopies, preparation quality was suboptimal (poor or fair) in 3047 patients (24%). Among these 3047 patients, repeat examination was performed in <3 years in 505 (17%). Factors associated with early repeat colonoscopy included lack of cecal intubation (odds ratio [OR] 3.62, 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.50-5.24) and finding a polyp (OR 1.55, 95% CI, 1.17-2.07). Among 216 repeat colonoscopies with optimal preparation, 198 adenomas were identified, of which 83 were seen only on the second examination, an adenoma miss rate of 42% (95% CI, 35-49). The advanced adenoma miss rate was 27% (95% CI, 17-41). For colonoscopies repeated in <1 year, the adenoma and advanced adenoma miss rates were 35% and 36%, respectively. LIMITATIONS Single-center, retrospective study. CONCLUSION Although a minority of patients undergo early repeat examination after colonoscopies done with suboptimal bowel preparation, the miss rates for colonoscopies done with suboptimal bowel preparation were high, suggesting that suboptimal bowel preparation substantially decreases colonoscopy effectiveness and may mandate an early follow-up examination.

[1]  N. Toribara,et al.  Colonoscopy completion in a large safety net health care system. , 2008, Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association.

[2]  R. Pearson,et al.  Utilization of Surveillance Colonoscopy in Community Practice , 2010 .

[3]  B. Levin,et al.  Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. , 2008, Gastroenterology.

[4]  V. Sharma,et al.  Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia. , 2003, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[5]  Bernard Burnand,et al.  Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study. , 2005, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[6]  Alfred I. Neugut,et al.  Socioeconomic and Other Predictors of Colonoscopy Preparation Quality , 2010, Digestive Diseases and Sciences.

[7]  B. Avidan,et al.  The Impact of Colon Cleanliness Assessment on Endoscopists' Recommendations for Follow-Up Colonoscopy , 2007, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[8]  J. Bond Should the Quality of Preparation Impact Postcolonoscopy Follow-Up Recommendations? , 2007, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[9]  U. Siddiqui,et al.  Fellow Involvement May Increase Adenoma Detection Rates During Colonoscopy , 2008, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[10]  Douglas K. Rex,et al.  Impact of bowel preparation on efficiency and cost of colonoscopy , 2002 .

[11]  P. Bossuyt,et al.  Polyp Miss Rate Determined by Tandem Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review , 2006, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[12]  Bernadette Mazurek Melnyk,et al.  Screening for colorectal cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. , 2008, Annals of internal medicine.

[13]  B. Spiegel,et al.  Fewer polyps detected by colonoscopy as the day progresses at a Veteran's Administration teaching hospital. , 2009, Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association.

[14]  Douglas K Rex,et al.  American College of Gastroenterology Guidelines for Colorectal Cancer Screening 2008 , 2022 .

[15]  R. Sampliner,et al.  Prospective blinded trial of the colonoscopic miss-rate of large colorectal polyps. , 1991, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[16]  D. Rex,et al.  Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. , 1997, Gastroenterology.

[17]  P. Maisonneuve,et al.  Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps. , 2008, Gastroenterology.

[18]  D. Heresbach,et al.  Miss rate for colorectal neoplastic polyps: a prospective multicenter study of back-to-back video colonoscopies , 2008, Endoscopy.