Positive Unit Hyperresolution Tableaux and Their Application to Minimal Model Generation

Minimal Herbrand models of sets of first-order clauses are useful in several areas of computer science, for example, automated theorem proving, program verification, logic programming, databases, and artificial intelligence. In most cases, the conventional model generation algorithms are inappropriate because they generate nonminimal Herbrand models and can be inefficient. This article describes an approach for generating the minimal Herbrand models of sets of first-order clauses. The approach builds upon positive unit hyperresolution (PUHR) tableaux, that are in general smaller than conventional tableaux. PUHR tableaux formalize the approach initially introduced with the theorem prover SATCHMO. Two minimal model generation procedures are described. The first one expands PUHR tableaux depth-first relying on a complement splitting expansion rule and on a form of backtracking involving constraints. A Prolog implementation, named MM-SATCHMO, of this procedure is given, and its performance on benchmark suites is reported. The second minimal model generation procedure performs a breadth-first, constrained expansion of PUHR (complement) tableaux. Both procedures are optimal in the sense that each minimal model is constructed only once, and the construction of nonminimal models is interrupted as soon as possible. They are complete in the following sense: The depth-first minimal model generation procedure computes all minimal Herbrand models of the considered clauses provided these models are all finite. The breadth-first minimal model generation procedure computes all finite minimal Herbrand models of the set of clauses under consideration. The proposed procedures are compared with related work in terms of both principles and performance on benchmark problems.

[1]  Hiroshi Fujita,et al.  A Model Generation Theorem Prover in KL1 Using a Ramified -Stack Algorithm , 1991, International Conference on Logic Programming.

[2]  Jaakko Hintikka Model minimization —An alternative to circumscription , 2004, Journal of Automated Reasoning.

[3]  Danny De Schreye,et al.  On the Duality of Abduction and Model Generation in a Framework for Model Generation with Equality , 1994, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[4]  Dietmar Seipel,et al.  DisLog - A System for Reasoning in Disjunctive Deductive Databases , 1994 .

[5]  Randy Goebel,et al.  Theorist: A Logical Reasoning System for Defaults and Diagnosis , 1987 .

[6]  Raymond Reiter,et al.  A Theory of Diagnosis from First Principles , 1986, Artif. Intell..

[7]  Nicolas Peltier,et al.  Simplifying and Generalizing Formulae in Tableaux. Pruning the Search Space and Building Models , 1997, TABLEAUX.

[8]  K. M. Hörnig Generating small Models of First Order Axioms , 1981, GWAI.

[9]  Sunna Torge Überprüfung der Erfüllbarkeit im Endlichen: ein Verfahren und seine Anwendung , 1998 .

[10]  Paul W. Purdom,et al.  Solving Satisfiability with Less Searching , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[11]  Chandrabose Aravindan,et al.  A Rational and Efficient Algorithm for View Deletion in Databases , 1997, ILPS.

[12]  François Bry,et al.  Checking Consistency of Database Constraints: a Logical Basis , 1986, VLDB.

[13]  V. Wiktor Marek,et al.  Nonmonotonic Logic , 1993, Artificial Intelligence.

[14]  Christoph Goller,et al.  Controlled integration of the cut rule into connection tableau calculi , 2004, Journal of Automated Reasoning.

[15]  Ricardo Caferra,et al.  Building Models by Using Tableaux Extended by Equational Problems , 1993 .

[16]  Katsumi Inoue,et al.  Embedding Negation as Failure into a Model Generation Theorem Prover , 1992, CADE.

[17]  David W. Reed,et al.  SATCHMORE: SATCHMO with RElevancy , 1995, Journal of Automated Reasoning.

[18]  David Scott Warren,et al.  Computation of Stable Models and Its Integration with Logical Query Processing , 1996, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng..

[19]  Owen L. Astrachan METEOR: Exploring model elimination theorem proving , 2004, Journal of Automated Reasoning.

[20]  Hilary Putnam,et al.  A Computing Procedure for Quantification Theory , 1960, JACM.

[21]  J. A. Robinson,et al.  Automatic Deduction with Hyper-Resolution , 1983 .

[22]  Adnan H. Yahya Generalized Query Answering in Disjunctive Deductive Databases: Procedural and Non-Monotonic Aspects , 1997, LPNMR.

[23]  Jack Minker,et al.  Bottom-Up Evaluation of Hierarchical Disjunctive Deductive Databases , 1991, ICLP.

[24]  Christian G. Fermüller,et al.  Hyperresolution and Automated Model Building , 1996, J. Log. Comput..

[25]  François Bry,et al.  A Hyperresolution-Based Proof Procedure and its Implementation in Prolog , 1987, GWAI.

[26]  Peter Baumgartner,et al.  Tableaux for Diagnosis Applications , 1997, TABLEAUX.

[27]  François Bry,et al.  Minimal Model Generation with Positive Unit Hyper-Resolution Tableaux , 1996, TABLEAUX.

[28]  Ilkka Niemelä A Tableau Calculus for Minimal Model Reasoning , 1996, TABLEAUX.

[29]  Marianne Winslett,et al.  Reasoning about Action Using a Possible Models Approach , 1988, AAAI.

[30]  Tim Geisler,et al.  Efficient Model Generation through Compilation , 1996, CADE.

[31]  John Wylie Lloyd,et al.  Foundations of Logic Programming , 1987, Symbolic Computation.

[32]  François Bry,et al.  SATCHMO: A Theorem Prover Implemented in Prolog , 1988, CADE.

[33]  Peter Baumgartner,et al.  Hyper Tableaux , 1996, JELIA.

[34]  Slim Abdennadher,et al.  Model Generation with Existentially Quantified Variables and Constraints , 1997, ALP/HOA.

[35]  Jack Minker,et al.  Ordered model trees: A normal form for disjunctive deductive databases , 2004, Journal of Automated Reasoning.

[36]  Jean-Paul Delahaye Formal methods in artificial intelligence , 1987 .

[37]  Miyuki Koshimura,et al.  MGTP: A Model Generation Theorem Prover - Its Advanced Features and Applications , 1997, TABLEAUX.

[38]  Alexander Leitsch,et al.  The Resolution Calculus , 1997, Texts in Theoretical Computer Science An EATCS Series.

[39]  Ilkka Niemelä Implementing Circumscription Using a Tableau Method , 1996, ECAI.

[40]  Hantao Zhang,et al.  SEM: a System for Enumerating Models , 1995, IJCAI.

[41]  Adnan H. Yahya Model Generation in Disjunctive Normal Databases , 1996 .

[42]  François Bry,et al.  Proving Finite Satisfiability of Deductive Databases , 1987, CSL.

[43]  Adnan H. Yahya A Goal-Driven Approach to Efficient Query Processing in Disjunctive Databases , 1996 .

[44]  Ronald Fagin,et al.  On the semantics of updates in databases , 1983, PODS.

[45]  David Poole,et al.  Explanation and prediction: an architecture for default and abductive reasoning , 1989, Comput. Intell..

[46]  François Bry,et al.  A Deduction Method Complete for Refutation and Finite Satisfiability , 1998, JELIA.

[47]  N. Eisinger,et al.  Sic: an Interactive Tool for the Design of Integrity Constraints (system Description) Sic: an Interactive Tool for the Design of Integrity Constraints (system Description) , 1997 .

[48]  P G rdenfors,et al.  Knowledge in flux: modeling the dynamics of epistemic states , 1988 .

[49]  Danny De Schreye,et al.  A framework for indeterministic model generation with equality , 1991 .

[50]  Marek A. Suchenek First-order syntactic characterizations of minimal entailment, domain-minimal entailment, and Herbrand entailment , 2004, Journal of Automated Reasoning.

[51]  Melvin Fitting,et al.  First-Order Logic and Automated Theorem Proving , 1990, Graduate Texts in Computer Science.

[52]  Graham Wrightson Preface to the special issue on tableaux , 2004, Journal of Automated Reasoning.

[53]  Bernhard Beckert,et al.  An Improved Method for Adding Equality to Free Variable Semantic Tableaux , 1992, CADE.

[54]  Nicola Olivetti Tableaux and sequent calculus for minimal entailment , 2004, Journal of Automated Reasoning.

[55]  Victor W. Marek,et al.  Nonmonotonic logic - context-dependent reasoning , 1997, Artificial intelligence.

[56]  Anil Nerode,et al.  Computing Circumscriptive Databases: I. Theory and Algorithms , 1995, Inf. Comput..

[57]  Jorge Lobo,et al.  Foundations of disjunctive logic programming , 1992, Logic Programming.

[58]  W. Bibel,et al.  Automated deduction : a basis for applications , 1998 .

[59]  Jack Minker,et al.  A Fixpoint Semantics for Disjunctive Logic Programs , 1990, J. Log. Program..

[60]  Jörg Flum,et al.  Mathematical logic , 1985, Undergraduate texts in mathematics.

[61]  Michael Kühn Rigid Hypertableaux , 1997, KI.

[62]  Sven Lorenz,et al.  A tableau prover for domain minimization , 1994, Journal of Automated Reasoning.

[63]  Mark E. Stickel Automated theorem-proving research in the Fifth Generation Computer Systems Project: Model generation theorem provers , 1993, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[64]  Katsumi Inoue,et al.  Non-Horn Magic Sets to Incorporate Top-down Inference into Bottom-up Theorem Proving , 1997, CADE.

[65]  François Bry,et al.  Intensional Updates: Abduction via Deduction , 1990, ICLP.

[66]  David A. Plaisted,et al.  Automated Deduction Techniques for Classification in Description Logic Systems , 1998, Journal of Automated Reasoning.

[67]  Tim Geisler,et al.  Satchmo - The Compiling and Functional Variants , 1997, Journal of Automated Reasoning.

[68]  J. Minker,et al.  Semantics for disjunctive logic programs , 1989 .

[69]  R. Smullyan First-Order Logic , 1968 .

[70]  Tanel Tammet Using Resolution for Deciding Solvable Classes and Building Finite Models , 1991, Baltic Computer Science.