Group comparisons: imaging the aging brain.

With the recent growth of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), scientists across a range of disciplines are comparing neural activity between groups of interest, such as healthy controls and clinical patients, children and young adults and younger and older adults. In this edition of Tools of the Trade, we will discuss why great caution must be taken when making group comparisons in studies using fMRI. Although many methodological contributions have been made in recent years, the suggestions for overcoming common issues are too often overlooked. This review focuses primarily on neuroimaging studies of healthy aging, but many of the issues raised apply to other group designs as well.

[1]  M. Rugg,et al.  The Relationship Between Brain Activity, Cognitive Performance, and Aging: The Case of Memory , 2009 .

[2]  Bruce Fischl,et al.  Geometry Driven Volumetric Registration , 2007, IPMI.

[3]  K. Jarrod Millman,et al.  Analysis of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Python , 2007, Computing in Science & Engineering.

[4]  J. Mattingley,et al.  Annual meeting of the Cognitive Neuroscience Society , 1997 .

[5]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  Alterations in the BOLD fMRI signal with ageing and disease: a challenge for neuroimaging , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[6]  Jonas Svensson,et al.  Investigation of spatial resolution, partial volume effects and smoothing in functional MRI using artificial 3D time series , 2008, NeuroImage.

[7]  P. Roland,et al.  Comparison of spatial normalization procedures and their impact on functional maps , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[8]  Egill Rostrup,et al.  Hypercapnic normalization of BOLD fMRI: comparison across field strengths and pulse sequences , 2004, NeuroImage.

[9]  Paul M. Thompson,et al.  Surface-Constrained Volumetric Brain Registration Using Harmonic Mappings , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[10]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  BOLD Functional MRI and Cognitive Aging , 2004 .

[11]  C. Grady.  Cognitive Neuroscience of Aging , 2008, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[12]  Babak A. Ardekani,et al.  Quantitative comparison of algorithms for inter-subject registration of 3D volumetric brain MRI scans , 2005, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[13]  Tammy English,et al.  Amygdala Responses to Emotionally Valenced Stimuli in Older and Younger Adults , 2004, Psychological science.

[14]  L. Carstensen.  The Influence of a Sense of Time on Human Development , 2006, Science.

[15]  D. Louis Collins,et al.  Tuning and Comparing Spatial Normalization Methods , 2003, MICCAI.

[16]  Paul M. Thompson,et al.  Automated brain tissue assessment in the elderly and demented population: Construction and validation of a sub-volume probabilistic brain atlas , 2005, NeuroImage.

[17]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  Reducing vascular variability of fMRI data across aging populations using a breathholding task , 2007, Human brain mapping.

[18]  C. Carter,et al.  The BOLD Hemodynamic Response in Healthy Aging , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[19]  Abraham Z Snyder,et al.  Reliability of functional localization using fMRI , 2003, NeuroImage.

[20]  Mark D'Esposito,et al.  Variation of BOLD hemodynamic responses across subjects and brain regions and their effects on statistical analyses , 2004, NeuroImage.

[21]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Spatial normalization of lesioned brains: Performance evaluation and impact on fMRI analyses , 2007, NeuroImage.

[22]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  The Effect of Normal Aging on the Coupling of Neural Activity to the Bold Hemodynamic Response , 1999, NeuroImage.

[23]  Russell A. Poldrack,et al.  In praise of tedious anatomy , 2007, NeuroImage.

[24]  Jeffrey W. Cooney,et al.  Top-down suppression deficit underlies working memory impairment in normal aging , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[25]  John G. Csernansky,et al.  Open Access Series of Imaging Studies (OASIS): Cross-sectional MRI Data in Young, Middle Aged, Nondemented, and Demented Older Adults , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[26]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  The Variability of Human, BOLD Hemodynamic Responses , 1998, NeuroImage.

[27]  Gregory R. Samanez-Larkin,et al.  Anticipation of monetary gain but not loss in healthy older adults , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[28]  J. Ashburner,et al.  Nonlinear spatial normalization using basis functions , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[29]  Brian Knutson,et al.  Individual Differences in Insular Sensitivity During Loss Anticipation Predict Avoidance Learning , 2008, Psychological science.

[30]  Lars Nyberg,et al.  Cognitive neuroscience of aging : linking cognitive and cerebral aging , 2004 .

[31]  J. Morris,et al.  Functional Brain Imaging of Young, Nondemented, and Demented Older Adults , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[32]  Karen M Rodrigue,et al.  Brain Aging and Its Modifiers , 2007, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[33]  Abraham Z. Snyder,et al.  A unified approach for morphometric and functional data analysis in young, old, and demented adults using automated atlas-based head size normalization: reliability and validation against manual measurement of total intracranial volume , 2004, NeuroImage.

[34]  R. Poldrack.  Region of interest analysis for fMRI. , 2007, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[35]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Multilevel linear modelling for FMRI group analysis using Bayesian inference , 2004, NeuroImage.

[36]  Cameron S. Carter,et al.  Prefrontal and striatal activation in elderly subjects during concurrent implicit and explicit sequence learning , 2006, Neurobiology of Aging.

[37]  R. Cabeza.  Hemispheric asymmetry reduction in older adults: the HAROLD model. , 2002, Psychology and aging.

[38]  Cheryl L. Dahle,et al.  Regional brain changes in aging healthy adults: general trends, individual differences and modifiers. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[39]  Cindy Lustig,et al.  Brain aging: reorganizing discoveries about the aging mind , 2005, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[40]  G. McCarthy,et al.  The Effects of Aging upon the Hemodynamic Response Measured by Functional MRI , 2001, NeuroImage.

[41]  H. Kugel,et al.  Age related signal decrease in functional magnetic resonance imaging during motor stimulation in humans , 2001, Neuroscience Letters.

[42]  P. Reuter-Lorenz.  New visions of the aging mind and brain , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[43]  John Suckling,et al.  Variable precision registration via wavelets: Optimal spatial scales for inter-subject registration of functional MRI , 2006, NeuroImage.