ML for Flood Forecasting at Scale

Effective riverine flood forecasting at scale is hindered by a multitude of factors, most notably the need to rely on human calibration in current methodology, the limited amount of data for a specific location, and the computational difficulty of building continent/global level models that are sufficiently accurate. Machine learning (ML) is primed to be useful in this scenario: learned models often surpass human experts in complex high-dimensional scenarios, and the framework of transfer or multitask learning is an appealing solution for leveraging local signals to achieve improved global performance. We propose to build on these strengths and develop ML systems for timely and accurate riverine flood prediction.

[1]  Jason Hickey,et al.  Data-driven discretization: a method for systematic coarse graining of partial differential equations , 2018 .

[2]  X. Y. Chen,et al.  A comparative study of population-based optimization algorithms for downstream river flow forecasting by a hybrid neural network model , 2015, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[3]  Thomas Loster,et al.  Flood Trends and Global Change , 1999 .

[4]  Kuolin Hsu,et al.  Self‐organizing linear output map (SOLO): An artificial neural network suitable for hydrologic modeling and analysis , 2002 .

[5]  Stephan Hoyer,et al.  Learning data-driven discretizations for partial differential equations , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  Qiang Yang,et al.  A Survey on Transfer Learning , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[7]  S. Jonkman Global Perspectives on Loss of Human Life Caused by Floods , 2005 .

[8]  Henrik Madsen,et al.  Comparison of different automated strategies for calibration of rainfall-runoff models , 2002 .

[9]  Ashu Jain,et al.  Hybrid neural network models for hydrologic time series forecasting , 2007, Appl. Soft Comput..

[10]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  Automatic calibration of a distributed catchment model , 2001 .

[11]  Christian W. Dawson,et al.  Hydrological modelling using artificial neural networks , 2001 .

[12]  P. Young,et al.  Time series analysis, forecasting and control , 1972, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[13]  Durga L. Shrestha,et al.  Machine learning approaches for estimation of prediction interval for the model output , 2006, Neural Networks.

[14]  Soroosh Sorooshian,et al.  Status of Automatic Calibration for Hydrologic Models: Comparison with Multilevel Expert Calibration , 1999 .

[15]  S. Doocy,et al.  The Human Impact of Tsunamis: a Historical Review of Events 1900-2009 and Systematic Literature Review , 2013, PLoS currents.

[16]  K. Beven Rainfall-Runoff Modelling: The Primer , 2012 .

[17]  Keith Beven,et al.  Changing ideas in hydrology — The case of physically-based models , 1989 .

[18]  S. Doocy,et al.  The Human Impact of Earthquakes: a Historical Review of Events 1980-2009 and Systematic Literature Review , 2013, PLoS currents.

[19]  S. N. Jonkman,et al.  Loss of life caused by floods : An overview of mortality statistics for worldwide floods , 2003 .

[20]  Kuolin Hsu,et al.  Artificial Neural Network Modeling of the Rainfall‐Runoff Process , 1995 .

[21]  Paul J. Pilon,et al.  Guidelines for Reducing Flood Losses , 2004 .

[22]  A. Soldati,et al.  River flood forecasting with a neural network model , 1999 .

[23]  A. Tokar,et al.  Rainfall-Runoff Modeling Using Artificial Neural Networks , 1999 .

[24]  David Strömberg Natural Disasters, Economic Development, and Humanitarian Aid , 2007 .

[25]  Gwilym M. Jenkins,et al.  Time series analysis, forecasting and control , 1971 .

[26]  Weiming Wu Computational River Dynamics , 2007 .

[27]  Soroosh Sorooshian,et al.  Toward improved calibration of hydrologic models: Combining the strengths of manual and automatic methods , 2000 .

[28]  Ami Wiesel,et al.  Towards Global Remote Discharge Estimation: Using the Few to Estimate The Many , 2019, ArXiv.