Power and Choice

Power and choice represent two fundamental forces that govern human behavior. Scholars have largely treated power as an interpersonal construct involving control over other individuals, whereas choice has largely been treated as an intrapersonal construct that concerns the ability to select a preferred course of action. Although these constructs have historically been studied separately, we propose that they share a common foundation—that both are rooted in an individual’s sense of personal control. Because of this common underlying basis, we hypothesized that power and choice are substitutable; that is, we predicted that the absence of one would increase the desire for the other, which, when acquired, would serve to satisfy the broader need for control. We also predicted that choice and power would exhibit a threshold effect, such that once one source of control had been provided (e.g., power), the addition of the other (e.g., choice) would yield diminishing returns. Six experiments provide evidence supporting these predictions.

[1]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Addressing Moderated Mediation Hypotheses: Theory, Methods, and Prescriptions , 2007, Multivariate behavioral research.

[2]  Simona Botti,et al.  The Locus of Choice: Personal Causality and Satisfaction with Hedonic and Utilitarian Decisions , 2011 .

[3]  D. Rucker,et al.  The Accentuation Bias: Money Literally Looms Larger (and Sometimes Smaller) to the Powerless , 2010 .

[4]  Aaron C. Kay,et al.  For God (or) country: the hydraulic relation between government instability and belief in religious sources of control. , 2010, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  Katie A. Liljenquist,et al.  Power reduces the press of the situation: implications for creativity, conformity, and dissonance. , 2008, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  Daniël H. J. Wigboldus,et al.  Abstract thinking increases one's sense of power , 2008 .

[7]  R. Bootzin,et al.  Effects of experimentally induced expectancies of external control: An investigation of learned helplessness , 1974 .

[8]  R. Emerson Power-Dependence Relations , 1962, Power in Modern Societies.

[9]  H. Lefcourt The function of the illusions of control and freedom. , 1973, The American psychologist.

[10]  Adam D. Galinsky,et al.  8 Social Hierarchy: The Self‐Reinforcing Nature of Power and Status , 2008 .

[11]  J. W. Thornton,et al.  The facilitating effects of prior inescapable/unavoidable stress on intellectual performance , 1972 .

[12]  E. Deci,et al.  On the Importance of Self-Determination for Intrinsically-Motivated Behavior , 1978 .

[13]  S. Roth,et al.  Effects of noncontingent reinforcement on tasks of differing importance: Facilitation and learned helplessness. , 1975 .

[14]  G. Fitzsimons Consumer Response to Stockouts , 2000 .

[15]  J. Rotter Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. , 1966, Psychological monographs.

[16]  J. Averill Personal control over aversive stimuli and its relationship to stress. , 1973 .

[17]  R. Decharms Personal causation : the internal affective determinants of behavior , 1968 .

[18]  Adam D. Galinsky,et al.  Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.324 Power, optimism, and risk-taking , 2022 .

[19]  R. Baumeister,et al.  The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[20]  J. Brehm A theory of psychological reactance. , 1981 .

[21]  M. Lepper,et al.  Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning: Beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice. , 1996 .

[22]  Richard E Petty,et al.  The effects of message recipients' power before and after persuasion: a self-validation analysis. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[23]  Edward L. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior , 1975, Perspectives in Social Psychology.

[24]  Joe C Magee,et al.  Power and the objectification of social targets. , 2008, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[25]  M. Ena Inesi,et al.  Power and loss aversion , 2010 .

[26]  Aaron C. Kay,et al.  God and the government: testing a compensatory control mechanism for the support of external systems. , 2008, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[27]  Suzanne M. Miller,et al.  Controllability and human stress: method, evidence and theory. , 1979, Behaviour research and therapy.

[28]  Derek D. Rucker,et al.  Desire to Acquire: Powerlessness and Compensatory Consumption , 2008 .

[29]  Adam D. Galinsky,et al.  Illusory Control , 2008, Psychological science.

[30]  Kathleen D. Vohs,et al.  The Meaning Maintenance Model: On the Coherence of Social Motivations , 2006, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[31]  Adam D. Galinsky,et al.  Lacking Control Increases Illusory Pattern Perception , 2008, Science.

[32]  A. Tenbrunsel,et al.  Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes , 2013 .

[33]  E. Langer,et al.  The effects of choice and enhanced personal responsibility for the aged: a field experiment in an institutional setting. , 1976, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[34]  Derek D. Rucker,et al.  Conspicuous consumption versus utilitarian ideals: How different levels of power shape consumer behavior , 2009 .

[35]  Simona Botti,et al.  When Choosing is Not Deciding: The Effect Of Perceived Responsibility on Satisfaction , 2006 .

[36]  Joe C Magee,et al.  From power to action. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.